Free Discrepancy Order Accepting Document - District Court of California - California


File Size: 16.6 kB
Pages: 1
Date: February 1, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 319 Words, 2,021 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/261020/14.pdf

Download Discrepancy Order Accepting Document - District Court of California ( 16.6 kB)


Preview Discrepancy Order Accepting Document - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-00033-L-AJB

Document 14

Filed 02/01/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO.: 08cv0033-L (AJB) CASE TITLE: Soto v. Diakon Logistics, Inc. E-FILED DATE: 1/29/2008 DOCKET NO.: 10 DOCUMENT TITLE: Exhibits to Third Party Complaint DOCUMENT FILED BY: Third Party Plaintiff Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted: x
Civil Local Rule or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual provision ("ECF")

Discrepancy

ECF § 2(h) ECF § 2(a), (g) ECF § 2(g) ECF § 2(f) Civ. L. Rule 5.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Civ. L. Rule 15.1 x ECF § 2(e) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: x

Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document(s) filed Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Lacking proper signature Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/Document(s) are not timely Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Missing table of contents Amended pleading not complete in itself OTHER: Failure to provide courtesy copy

The documents are accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. If a courtesy copy is not provided by Tuesday, February 5, 2008, the documents will be stricken from the record.

The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties. Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1. DATED: February 1, 2008

M. James Lorenz United States District Court Judge