Free Discrepancy Order Rejecting Document - District Court of California - California


File Size: 16.7 kB
Pages: 1
Date: January 30, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 324 Words, 2,068 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/261020/12.pdf

Download Discrepancy Order Rejecting Document - District Court of California ( 16.7 kB)


Preview Discrepancy Order Rejecting Document - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-00033-L-AJB

Document 12

Filed 01/30/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO.: 08cv0033-L (AJB) CASE TITLE: Soto v. Diakon Logistics, Inc. E-FILED DATE: 1/29/2008 DOCKET NO.: 11 DOCUMENT TITLE: Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Filing Responses to Counterclaim and Third Party Complaint DOCUMENT FILED BY: Plaintiff Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted: x
Civil Local Rule or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual provision ("ECF")

Discrepancy

X X X

ECF § 2(h) ECF § 2(a), (g) ECF § 2(g) ECF § 2(f) Civ. L. Rule 5.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Civ. L. Rule 15.1

Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document(s) filed - Stipulated requests are to be filed as Joint Motions Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Certificate of Service Lacking proper signature Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/Document(s) are not timely Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Missing table of contents Amended pleading not complete in itself OTHER:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties. Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1. DATED: January 30, 2008 X

M. James Lorenz United States District Court Judge