Free Motion to Continue - District Court of California - California


File Size: 1,135.2 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 608 Words, 4,262 Characters
Page Size: 612 x 791.76 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/261020/13-1.pdf

Download Motion to Continue - District Court of California ( 1,135.2 kB)


Preview Motion to Continue - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-00033-L-AJB

Document 13

Filed 01/31/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 LAW OFFICE TODD J. HILTS OF 2 2 2 | 4 2n dA ve SanDiego,CA92I0l (6 Telephone 19) 531-7900 (619)53l-7904 4 Facsimile
a

(CSBNo. 161105) J. 5 Derek Emge EMGE& ASSOCIATES 550WestC Street, 1600 Ste. Diego, 92101 San CA 1 Telephone 9) 595-1400 (61 (619) Facsimile 595-1480 B
o

9 DavidA. Huch(CSBNo.222892) LAW OFFICES DAVID A. HUCH OF 1 0 7040AvenidaEncinas, Suite104 Carlsbad, CA920lI 11 (7 Telephone 60) 402-9 528 I 2 Facsimile(760) 683-3245 for Individually, Behalfof All Others 1 3 Attorneys Plaintiff,JOSUESOTO, On SimilarlySituated, andon Behalfof the General Public IN THE UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT SOUTHERNDISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

I4

15

T6

T 1 JOSUE SOTO,Individually, Behalfof All ) CIVL NO. 08cv0033 (AJB) On L Others SimilarlySituated, on Behalfof the ) and 1 B GeneralPublic,
)

79 20

) CLASSACTION
Plaintiff,
)

) STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TO ) DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE 27 COUNTERCLAIM ) (DELAWARE), INC.,a ) DIAKONLOGISTICS 2 2 foreign 50, co{p.;andDOES1 through ) inclusive, ) 23
zq

Defendants.

) )

25 26 21 28
1
STIPULATIONTO COINTINUE TO DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE COURNTERCLAIM L 08cv0033 (AJB)

Case 3:08-cv-00033-L-AJB

Document 13

I

Filed 01/31/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 ) 3

DIAKON LOGISTICS (DELAWARE) This stipulationis enteredinto betweendefendant counsel. lNC., and Plaintiff JOSUE SOTO, by and throughtheir undersigned 1. This action was filed in SanDiego SuperiorCourt, casenumber:37-2007

5, 2001. on 4 00083029-CU-OE-CTL December 5
o

2. 3.

removedthe action to FederalCourt. On January4,2008, Defendant filed an Answer and Counterclaimfor Indemnity On January11, 2008,Defendant

1 againstPlaintiff SOTO. B 9 2008. 10 5. 4. is to Plaintiff SOTO'S response the counterclaim due to be filed by January31, , filed a Third-PartyComplaint againstSAYBE'S On January28,2008, Defendant

SOTO. The Third-PartyComplaint containsa 11 LLC, an entity createdon the behalf of Plaintiff t2 singlecauseof action for indemnity similar to that allegedin the counter-claimagainstPlaintiff

to hasagreed acceptservice,the Third-PartyComplainthas 13 SOTO. Although Plaintiff s counsel I4 15 I6 I1 not yet beenserved. 6. The presentmatter has been scheduledfor an Early Neutral Evaluation Conference

26,2008. on February L to Good causeexistsfor continuingthe deadlinefor Plaintiff SOTO'S response the

to response the Third-PartyComplaint as both pleadings to 1B counterclaim the samedateas the I9 containthe identicalcauseof action for indemnificationand it would be more economicalto

pleadings simultaneously. to 20 handleidenticalchallenges both 2I 8. On January28 and 29,2008,counselfor Plaintiff SOTO and counselfor Defendant

to coordinationof deadlines respondto both the counterclaim 22 met and conferredregardinga ComplaintagainstSAYBE'S LLC. As a result of the meet and 2 3 againstSOTO and the Third-Party pleadingsto both claims within plaintiff s counselindicatedthat they would file responsive 2 4 confer, Third-Party Complaint, but before the ENE Conference. 2 5 20 days of service of the
ZO

21 28

2
STIPULATIONTO COINTINUE TO DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE COURNTERCLAIM L 08cv0033 (AJB)

Case 3:08-cv-00033-L-AJB

Document 13

Filed 01/31/2008

Page 3 of 3

1
z
a

Pursuant LocalRule7.2,thiswrittenstipulation to affecting progress the case the of is hereby filed with the Court,is in theformprovided LocalRule52.1,andwill only beeffective by whenapproved this Court. by Accordingly,it is hereby stipulated andbetween parties by the hereto, throughtheir permitting respective counsel, theCourtshould that an PlaintiffSOTOto file his issue order

4

to counterclaim thenewlyfiled Third-Party and within 20 daysof Complaint 6 response the pending service thelatter. of
I 9 10
r ':._ ,.- ,'.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

DATED:January ,ZOOL )1

EMGE ASSOCIATES & S
ri '

11 72 13 I4 15 16 L7

DerekJ.Emge Atrorneys Plainti4 JOSTIE for SOTO,tndividually, on behalfof all others similarlysituated, on and behalf theGeneral Public. of

DATED:January Ll,ZOOt

GARVIN,LIGHT, HANSON& SCOPELITIS, FEARYLLC

ChristopherC. McNatt, Jr. 18 1.9 Attorneys for Defendant, DIAKON LOGISTICS

(DELAWARE) rNC.

20 2t 22

24 25
)K

27 28

STIPULA DBADLINE FOR RESPONSE'I'O COURNTBRCLAIM L 08cv0033 (AJB)