Case 1:03-cv-02579-RPM
Document 148-5
Filed 01/11/2007
Page Page 1 of 5
of5
Westiaw
Slip
Copy Copy 2006
Page
Slip
WL
2329460
Cite as Slip
Informatica Briefs
Informatica
and
Documents
Discovery Objects the
Order
papers
carefUlly considered arguments
Informatica Integration
citation
is
Corp
currently
States
Business
Data
parties the
and
legal
and
cause
Inc.N.D.Cal.2006.Only
relevant
and
hereby
appearing
Court
DENIES
Defendants
United
CourtN.D
California
objections
AFFIRMS
Court
the Discovery
INFORMATICA
Corporation
Delaware The
District
may
to
modify
ruling be
or on
set
aside
any
portion
of
nondispositive erroneous see also
BUSINESS
DATA
known
as
pre-trial
clearly
INC
formerly
Acta Defendants
Inc
contrary
to
law
City
72a
County of San Cir.1991
court
left
e.g
951
Delaware
andRelated
Grimes
F.2d
and 9th
Counterclaims 02-3378
236
if
clearly after
No
JSW
erroneous the
evidence
definite been
firm
Aug
2006
conviction United States
mistake
395
Albert
68
Gypsum L.Ed 746
Co
Lukas West
Sieber
Aparna
Rajagopal-Durbin The
dispute waiver
to at
Fenwick Shanberg
Carolyn
LLP
Coie
issue concerns
relies
the scope
of
Perkins
LLP
San David Douglas
the
on
advice
Chang Darren David Schumann
West Fenwick
Donnelly Lynn
counsel
defend
allegations
Pasahow
infringement attorney Phil
November
2000
advise Albert
hired
Fenwick
CA
West
Townsend
Maher
for
LLP
Palo
Alto
CA
and
Crew
LLP
Townsend
patents
to
several
Informatica opinions Informatica
Mr
27
Theodore Greco Townsend
Saffer
Herhold
Robert
Furniss
written
on
June
this
2002
lawsuit
July
15
and Crew
2002
CA
Townsend
Joseph
ACTA
BODI Jr
its
BODI
had
acquired
ACTA
Townsend
and Leonard
Crew
on August Fumiss with
since
as
Denver Townsend
Francisco
CO
and
patent
litigation
1996
After
to
Crew Defendants
LLP
purchasing represent
ACTA
BODI
in
BODI
asked
Mr
June
Furniss
CA
lawsuit opinions
in
communicating
2002
Mr
ORDER DENYING OBJECTIONS AND
DISCOVERY
JEFFREY
Albert
has with occurred issued
conversations
on
background
THE
issues
which
Court the Integration
on
at Townsend November 14
After
WHITE
the Business
District
is
claim asked
construction Riter an
to
ruling attorney provide
August
Now
Defendant
2005 BODI
Inc
not
affiliated in
Bruce
who
Data
Townsend
light that
BODI
Judge
part
ACTA
James and
known
to
as
Acta
Technology
Inc
in
opinions
the Larson
order
issued
BODI
14
granting
represents
has product
to
dated part
communications and
and
by
their
Mr
Albert
in
motion
Mr
Riter
2007
Thomson/West
No
to
Orig
Works
rIB1T
https
//web2
.westlaw.comlprint/printstream.aspxsvSplitdestinationatputid%7b70..
1/10/2007
Case 1:03-cv-02579-RPM
Document 148-5
Filed 01/11/2007
Page Page 2 of 5
of
Slip
Copy
Page
Slip
Copy 2006
N.D.Cal
Cite as Slip
Copy
opinions
but or
has
refused
to trial
produce counsel
at
prevent party
such defends
its
the
court
held
communications
work
by
an
Townsend
the
attorney-client attorney-client
communication
privilege regarding
as to
all
Discovery
Order
Judge
Larson
held both
that
communications Id
same
subject
matter
BODI
and the opinion
attorney-client
pre
of
its
communications on which
defense
on
the
BODI
work was communicated which
As
cited
authority
its
holding
advice-of-counsel the
on
to
held
is
same
subject
because requirement receive party opens
entire to to
is
continuing care
the
BODI
any
subjection waiver alike arguing waiver
to
its
any
attorney-client Judge
to
documents
reference
exercise continuing of
and
Therefore once
on
further
that
Larson opinion
to
held
trial
the counsel
the defense inspection course of the the
applied
BOD
Judge
the erred
Order by
the
Larson
Consequently
privilege points or
waiver
of covers
all
counsel
work
product
including also not limited the matter received of
up
to
through the advice
This discovery
Court
must apply
dispute See F.3d re
to
this
waiver opinion subject opinions
EchoStar 1294
1298
encompassed
that
Communications Fed.Cir.2006 Sys
Corp
quoting
advice
the
that
means must
be
that
Medtronic
Inc
F.3d
1294
even
those other
from
counsel...
Fed.Cir.200l
deciding materials materials
Federal
particular in
when
or patent other
if
attorneys of gained
opinion
test
whether
are
requires
to that as to
knowledge
the can
discoverable
to
case
infringer
relating
an
issue
patent
that to will
law on
of
matter
must
be
revealed
so
Where
advice
willful
party counsel
announces
response
it
make
reliance
own
determination
whether
of
an
assertion
was reasonable
infringement In re
waives
the
attorney-client
at
privilege dispute
EchoStar
the scope of
1299
Akeva
found privilege
243
F.Supp.2d defendants respect required received ..
trial
at
423
waived
the
issue
Akeva
the
court
concerns
waiver
In
re
EchoStar
the
defendant
produced which
an an
and
all
to
disclose
relating to
opinion opinion chose
from from
not EchoStar counsel with outside rely chose
it
counsel
on
EchoStar
infringement defendants
even
if
from and even
if letter
Circuit
to rely
attorneys
when
on
the
of
pre-date
opinion
or
post-date Id
in-house privilege
regard
relating to
to
communications
including in-house
the with
any same
attorney-client
subject
matter
it
The
In
light
re
EchoStar
especially
communications
counsel...
at
counsel citing
other
of
case
proposed exclude
does
not
1399
LLC 418
lead could
to
provide on the
any support
scope given of of
for
BODIs
to
Mizuno
243 The
the the
F.Supp.2d reasoned
423
waiver
trial
or
M.D.N.C.2003
selective
court
advice the matter
counsel
on
the
same
subject Albert
waiver
result for
may
party
opinion Court not
clearly finds
by
Mr
inequitable
its
Accordingly
rnling
Judge contrary
Larsons law
was
erroneous denies
privilege
on
unfavorable
advice
Id
at
1301
To
Therefore
Defendants
objections
2007
Thomson/West
No
Claim
to
Orig
Works
https//web2
.westlaw.eoSprint/printstream.aspxsvSplitdestinationatputith%7b7O..
1/10/2007
Case 1:03-cv-02579-RPM
Document 148-5
Filed 01/11/2007
Page Page 3 of 5
of
Slip
Copy
Page
Slip
Cite
Copy 2006 WL as Slip Copy
N.D.Cal
and
the
Order
14
Corporations Discovery
Request
to
to
Re-Open
Liability
2006
should
And
Submit
New
Report
Dec
2006
Nevertheless require pertaining explained
this
not of
be
construed
to
2006
and
3761479
Affidavit
Trial Brief
Memorandum
on Merits
wholesale
to in
trial
or
litigation
strategy
As the court Computer
Discovery
2006
3761475
Trial Business Opposition the
to
Concolve F.R.D
that
Inc
2006 and
Integration Corp.s Counterclaim Patent
Memorandum
Data
Informatica
Corp
counsels of
224
S.D.N.Y.2004
on advice
of
in
trial
Defendant
Inc.s Brief That
reasonableness
reliance
must be
the context
trial
Dismiss
disclosed of counsel strategy enforcement
even
if
it
on
the
Unenforceability
374
preparation surely concerning
in
But
at
the
same
the
time
Dec
3761476
Trial
2006 and and
Affidavit of
Motion
Corporations Brief
to
validity not implicate therefore opinions matter Albert of
advice-of-counsel required advice given
to
that ways defense trial
Support
is
Court
Excercising
Its
Discretion on the
BODI
Dismiss Patent
Bodis
Counterclaims
374
disclose address
or
Dec
2006
3761474
Statement Trial Filing
2006
withhold or
trial
Mr
and
not
as
may
to litigation
Management 2006 and
Affidavit
Nov
Trial Brief
in
2006
Motion
Support
to
communications
strategy
that
3609589
implicate
the Larson
of
Strike
Plaintiff
defense
Thus
Magistrate opinions
to
ordered and
Informatica Asserted
Corporations Opinions
Motion
Newly
legal
Invalidity in
Declaration of
to
strategy
relies
unrelated
the
on from
which
BODI
to
of
P.J
Kelly
Support
Objects Informatica
may
to
be
be
Data
Integration
Inc.s
Partial
Opposition
produced
Informatica
Corp.s Motion
Summary Judgment
Motion
Objects
to
12 2006 BODI
the
is
to
produce log
all
2006
with
2882310
Trial
documents
and Order no
and
Affidavit Inc.s
Defendant
Opposition
Data
Corp.s of
later
than
900 a.m on
Integration
Informatica
to
Friday August
11
Motion
Supplemental
Administrative Declaration
Relief
Allow
to this
Objections
Evidence Document
IT
Sep
28
2006
2882309
Image
of
PDF
N.D.Cal.2006
Informatica Integration
Slip
2006
Trial
Motion
Business
to
Corp
Inc
Objects
Data
and
Integration Inc.s
Strike
Defendant
Opposition
Data
Informatica
Copy 2006
and
Related
N.D.Cal
Documents
Motion
this
to
2006
Declaration of Informatica Objects
Image
of
Document
PDF
2646127
in to
Briefs
Back
to
top
2006 Mcgoveran
of
Support Business
2006
Expert
3761220
Informaticas
Supplemental
Opposition Inc.s
Integration
McGoveran
Dec
Statement
2006
Joint
Motion and
Inequitable
Judgment
2006 Case
WL
Management
Trial Conference
Filing
Noninfringement
Aug
Dec
25 2006
2006 and
Affidavit
Image of 2702659
Trial
Document
PDF
Data
Informatica
2006
2006 and
Integration
Memorandum
Objects
to Partial
Memorandum
Defendant
Inc.s Business
Defendant
Opposition
Data
Integration Corporations
Motion
for
Summary
2007
Thomson/West
No
Claim
to
Orig U.S Govt Works
https//web2
.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspxsvSplitdestinationatputid%7b70..
1/10/2007
Case 1:03-cv-02579-RPM
Document 148-5
Filed 01/11/2007
Page Page 4 of 5
Slip
Page
Slip
Cite
WL Copy as Slip Copy
Judgment Document 2006 and
to for
25
Image
this
Original
PDF
2702660
Trial Corporations Integration of
2006
WL
Image of 1785805 Reply
Document
Trial
to
PDF
Informatica
Memorandum
Opposition Inc.s
Corporations Counterclaims
this
Second
Amended
Image
Informatica
2006
Business
Data Judgment
Motion and
Document
PDF
1785881
Trial
Summary
2006 and
Its
Memorandum
Response
in
Inequitable
Conduct Document
Aug
25
2006 Awez
Original
Affidavit
Informaticas
to
Support
of
Image of 2006
Support Opposition
PDF
Declaration
in
Motion
Compel
May
2006 Memorandum
Data
Image of 2006
and Integration
Document 1785880
PDF
Trial
Business
to
Objects
Data
Integration
Inc.s
Partial
Informatica
Corp.s
Defendant
Inc.s Brief
Summary
of
Aug
24 2006
Declaration
Image
Document 2006
PDF
John Data
to
Motion
this
to
Compel
2006
Pleading
Image of Second and
Document
PDF
1785804
to First
Kelly Integration
Support Inc.s
Partial
of Informatica
2006
WL
Corp.s
Amended
Counterclaim
Motion
for
Summary
Document
Trial
24
2006
Original
Image
this
2006
2006 and
Objection Granting Original
to
Image
PDF
Memorandum
to
Document 2006 Case
PDF
WL
2632152
Trial Statement
Joint
Motion
Plaintiffs
Response
Judge
to
Defendants
Management
Original
Conference
Apr
21
Magistrate
Larsons
2006 2006
2006 and
Part
Motion
this
Compel
WL
Document Image of 397999 Trial
PDF
Strike
Image
2006
Kelly Integration
2525282
Support Inc.s of
John
Data Data
Integration Patent Rule
Inc.s Claims Final Original
in
Motion
to
Asserted Local
Corporations Infringement
Motion and
Summary Judgment
of
3-6
Non-Infringement
Inequitable
Aug
Jan
23
2006
Image
of
this
Document
2006
2006 and
Integration
Image of 2579819
Trial
Document
PDF
Memorandum
Data
of
PDF
2006 and
Opposition Integration Patent Final Original Claims
to
397998
Trial
Memorandum
Corporations
Defendant
Inc.s
Business
Plaintiff
Motion and
Summary Judgment
and
Defendant Motion
Plaintiff to Strike
Data
Non-Infringement
Conduct
Memorandum
Civ Document 2006 and
Integration
of
Points
YFed
Image
Corporations
56 Aug
2006
Trial Business
to
Jan
Image of Document
Trial Informatica
20
2006
PDF
2429320
PDF
Corporations
Memorandum
Data
Judge
2006 and
WL
to
397996
Defendant
Inc.s
Plaintiff
Magistrate
Opposition Integration
Defendant Motion
to
Data
Shorten Patent
its
Larsons Order Granting in Part Motion to and Request Stay Civil 72-2 28 Jul 28 2006
Compel
Motion
Original
Plaintiff
to
Strike
Claims
3.6
636b1A
Document 1785882 Defendant
Inc.s
Informatica Contentions
Image of 2006 and
Integration Informaticas Original
Final
WL
Memorandum
Business
Original
Data Opposing
2003
Image of this Document 25278093 Trial
Corporations
PDF
Plaintiff
Informatica Construction
Motion
Image 2632153 on
to Compel Document
30
Status
Under Image of 25278092
Patent
Lr
4-5c
25
PDF
19
2003
2003
Original
Document
Trial
PDF
Inc.s
2006
Report
WL
Representative
Business
Integration
2007
No Claim
to
Orig
Works
https
1/10/2007
Case 1:03-cv-02579-RPM
Document 148-5
Filed 01/11/2007
Page Page 5 of 5
of
Slip
Copy 2006
Page
Slip
WL
2329460
N.D.Cal
Cite
as
Slip
Copy
Responsive
Claim 18
Patent
L.R
4-5b Aug
Document 2003
WL WL
25278066
of
Mcgoveran 2003 25278091
Corporations Brief Patent
Pleading Opening Claim
Informatica Construction
L.R
4-5a
2003
2003 and
Original
WL
Image of 25278090
Informatica
Document
PDF
Reply
to
Affidavit
Amended
Image of 2003 Answer
Counterclaim
Counterclaims
this
23
2003 Amended
and
of
this
Document 25278089
PDF
Trial
Pleading
to
First
Complaint
May
25278088
2003
Original
Image
Document 2003 Management Order
Trial Filing
Case Proposed
of
Statement
and Image
Apr WL
11
2003
Trial
Document 2003 and
PDF
25278087 Motion
Memorandum
Affidavit
Defendant
Inc.s
Integration Informatica Local Rules
Motion
to
to
Compel
with the Patent of
Corporation
Comply
10 2003
Original
Image
Document 2002
PDF
WL
Complaint
Original Trial Patent Infringement
Amended
17
2002
2002
Image of
Document Pleading
PDF
WL
Jul
for
15
2002
Image of this Document 302cv03378 Docket 2002 Inmon
PDF
15 2002
Declaration of Business Objects
WL
in
Support Inc.s
Data
Integration
Claim Construction
2002
Expert Original
002
Report of
this
WL
of
Informaticas
McGoveran
2002
Image
Document
PDF
END OF
2007
ThomsonlWest
No Claim
to
Orig U.S
Works
https//web2
.west1aw.conprint/printstream.aspxsvSp1itdestinationatputid%7b7O..
1/10/2007