Case 1:03-cv-02579-RPM
Document 147-3
Filed 01/11/2007
Page 1 of 2
13
Ic
World
2O
Floor
OConnoz
Canada
Street
Ottawa
KP
Octobef29 2002
1A4
613.788.2200 613.788.2247
Telephone Facsimile
www.b1akes.com
Leier
Direct
Dial
613.788.2244
E-mail
teny.leietb1akes.com
DELIVERED
BY
Reference 101644/3
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL SUBJECT TO AND CLIENT
Mr
Jim
President
Systems
Corp
6130-
3td
Street
Calgary Alberta T2H 1K4
Dear
Mr
Pason Systems
Re
Corp
Auto
Our
Drilling
file
101644-03
This
letter
patent patent
infringement
to
of proposed
equipment
in
view of
Canadian
2094313
Bowden
Since Canadian
to perspective
is
country
specific are
have Canadian
addressed
the
matter
of infringement from
to
only as
law
before
provide address the
as
it
comments based on our
issue the
practise
Any the U.S
of the
the
U.S
patents
is
made
Patent
and of
Trademark
Office
in-force
To
of infringement
define as they are
requires
claims
patents
claims
monopoly of
longer in
patent
Once
patent
expires
in force
claims
are
cannot
be
enforceable
patent
Moreover
claims
when
only enforceable
in the jurisdiction
which
was granted
Based appears
my
understanding
the apparatus
of your
proposed
apparatus
as
described
is
more
detail
that
of your
computer-based
system
completely
apparatus
different
than
pneumatic
airangement
taught
Bowden
you have
different
than that claimed in
40179311.1
MontrĂ˜al
Ottawa
Toronto
Vaocovvcr
IT
Case 1:03-cv-02579-RPM
Document 147-3
Filed 01/11/2007
Page 2 of 2
Bui CASSELS
Dependent
information
C1uYnoN LLP
Page
claim
12
introduces in relation
this
steps to the
requiring
measurement
system does
of
drill at all
string to
torque
The
torque
provided
Pason
not refer
any such
measurements
Similarly in
therefore claim
claim would not be
refers to
infringed
drill
by
string to
the Pason system
dpendent
13
measurement of
the
drill
which
is
not described
Pason
disclosure
In
any event
string
is
not
subject
RPM
motor
is
used
method
and producing
are
14 provides
or
for
measurement of
drilling
pressure and signal
bit
weight
changes
differential
signal release
measurement of
drill
The
differential
signals
then selected
control
of
string
US
and
patent the
346 1978
to
Whittle
to
using
control
bit
or draw
see figure
tension and
sensor
of
draw works
discussion
derivative
at that
Whittle does not provide of that
apparatus for measuring measurement of
pressure or taking the pressures was
measurement
however
in
time as described
by Varney
In relation
to
is
the
Pason system
to
the
that
not
sufficiently
detailed
to
detennine
whether
it
proposed of each and
measure
both the
to control
on
bit
and works
that
pressure
Clarification
and take
of what out
is
the derivative
measurement
measurements needed
for
of those
consideration in relation to
measurements
this
Pason
proposes
to
carry
claim
Dependent
Drilling therefore
claim
15
measurement hole with
of
drill
torque
and
that
to the
drill
steps
of claim
14
using
down
motor would seem to
imply
stationary
drilling rig
down hole mud motor could not be Bowden
to infringe
claim
US
Patent
No
address
the the
to
will limited
now
to
corresponding
patent
115
patent
in
However
the differences versus
first
note that
principles in to
this
is
Canadian
and
the
law
Canada
are
of patent
art
law are
generally
between Canada
for patentability for
first
what
is
and
those
requirements
differences construction
to
file
invent
Moreover
the
have changed
applied
to
over the years
patent claims
with changing by
laws
is
principles
of
in
US
US
courts
not
identical
to
the
used
Canada
Having
regard to Unlike
the foregoing
have
few
comments
will
for
your consideration
rely
relation
to
the
US
patent
Canada
in the
US
US
review and
on statements made by
4017951
1.1