Free Designation of Deposition Testimony - District Court of Colorado - Colorado

Case 1:03-cv-02579-RPM

Document 147-2

Filed 01/11/2007

Page 1 of 2

blake
February 2000

World
20th

Plaza
Street

Floor 45 OConngr Canada 613.7882200
613.788.2247

Ottawa 1A4 Telephone
Facsimile

www.blakes.com

Teny
Direct 613.788.2244

E-mail

DELIVERED

BY
Reference 101644/3

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL SUBSECT TO SOLICITOR AND CLiENT

Mr
Ballem

Ronald Hansford Maclimes
Solicitors

Banisters 1800
First

Canadian

Centre

350-7th
Calgary

Avenue S.W
Alberta

T2P3N9
Dear

Ron
Pason Systems

4%

Re

Corp
System

Auto
Our

Drilling

file

101644-03

This Pason

is

to

follow

up

our recent

telephone conference

call

relating

to

Auto

Drilling

System of

Systems

Corp

Summary
this

letter

shall

the

issues

raised patent

in

c-mails three

our telephone
general

conference
First the the

to

discuss

them

This
is

review falling
is

areas

issue

of of infringement
are

discussed from

Since

infringement

country
are

specific

have law finn

matter
patents
is

Canadian

perspective
this

As we
review and
is

Canadian
as

US

reviewed
in the

in

terms only and place from
for

understand Pason

US

an

export

expansion
in the

issues outline

are

first

discussed

each

the that located

patents

identified

Next

an

of

infringement
for

searching

was conducted
patents the

iirovided

followed
applications in-force patents

infringement issues
the issue

each
requires

and

published patent of and

To
as
it is

of infringement

review

40113111.1

LXIT

Case 1:03-cv-02579-RPM

Document 147-2

Filed 01/11/2007

Page 2 of 2

Ii

BLAKE CASSELS

GRAYDON LLP

Page

The

e-mail

disclosure delivered driving

does not indicate

whether 16
to

Will

sensors to measure the
estimate

ate of
delivered
to

the the

drilling

mud

by
the

the
drill bit

mud
The

mqtor

12

pump 10 have
II

provide

an

the power

not included

volume

e-mail

description

pressure
in

drop

across

the

mud

motor

as

the

key
at this

component
the inlet

of

system however
of the

enclosed
obtain

drawing
the

have

not shown any

transducers
as

and

outlet

mud

motor

12 to

pressure
is

drop across the system
to
is

mud motor
surface

would system There which will need

down
are to

hole telemetry were

My

understanding during
to

that

telemetry

systems that be looked

bypassed

search directed

down

hole telemetry

at if there

be down-bole

For the purposes
the

of the present letter
as the

assume

system

such

sensors
are
all

transducers

that the components that will be used to produce computer mud motor and so on that form the

elements
individual relation recently tension to

of the
sensors are

commercial

products

purchased
for

off the

shelf

Naturally

if

the
in

going to

be manufactured

by or
for

Pason

then further

sub-searching

to those drafted

items that will be manufactured should
patent application that

done

example
in relation to

have
cable

your

consideration

apparatus

Further

system

configuration

and

software

operate the computer Issues of

of the system will

or for Pason

Infringement

The
described
patents to

area

interest

that

raised

is

the

issue

of
are

or

not

the in

system

as

here

infringes

any

patent

As you may
sold in

know

patents into

territorial

nature

US
apply

apply to apparatus manufactured
sold or

or distributed

Canadian

patents

apparatus produced
apparatus the

distributed
is

Canada and
answered
in the

so

on
on
the

The

question
to

whether

particular to

infringes

any patent

difficult

answer

Any

attempt of

answer

of infringement must be of which are reviewed
in
detail

based
to

specific

patent

or set

patents

the

apparatus or method of infringement
is

under
locate

consideration
patents

The
are

first

step to

in

attempting
relevant to

to

answer

to

which

believed
patents

be

the

apparatus under not expired

consideration
In

This requires
are

search of granted
rights
is

that

are in-force

and

Canada

there

contingent
it

to

reasonable

compensation on

publication patent

patent

application they

Therefore

also

necessary to review
in

Canadian

applications

as

may become

granted

patents

future

key

step

in

providing and
will

opinion opinion
practice patents in

is

to

conduct
is

search

to locate

the specific to the

set

of patents
as
this is

that

be

considered
that the

This

necessarily

limited In

Canada
present

the jurisdiction
start

case
patents
is

will

with

we US
have

carries has identifled as

on business

Pason

being of interest

Of

the are

US
what
are

selected

Pason
an

Canadian

counterparts
it

The
the claims

patents patents

from

infringement perspective

which

40113711.1