Free Proposed Jury Instructions - District Court of Colorado - Colorado

Case 1:04-cv-01067-MSK-CBS

Document 117-15

Filed 05/26/2006

Page 1 of 1

Pani' C mp t gIS R C I NN . 1 litf o ei N T U TO fs n O4 If the decision maker at the post-termination hearing is impartial, the requirements of procedural due process may be satisfied so long as all the requirements of procedural due process identified earlier, including an adequate remedy frh v l i o o e r hs aeme.T efc ta tei e t ai o tec ag s o te ia o f n ' i t r o tn sg , t h a th th n sg t n fh h re v i o against the Plaintiff was biased or that there may not have been an impartial decision ma e a tePa t 'pe k r th lnis r-termination hearing does not me nta Pa t 'po e ua if f a h t lnis rc d rl if f due process rights have been violated, so long as the post-termination procedures were adequate to protect his rights. Authority: Cacy v. City of Chickashaw, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23039 n. 6 (10th Cir. 1997). Clements v. Airport Auth., 69 F. 3d 3321, 333 n. 15 (9th Cir. 1995). McDaniles v. Flick, 59 F.3d 446, 460 (3rd Cir.) cert. denied 516 U.S. 1146 (1996). McKinney v. Pate, 20 F. 3d 1150, 1162 (11th Cir. 1994).