Case 1:96-cv-00407-LB
Document 17
Filed 01/15/2004
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ) ) and ) ) THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC CO., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) ) PSI ENERGY, INC.,
Case Nos. 96-371C & 96-407C (Judge Block)
JOINT FILING PURSUANT TO DECEMBER 19, 2003 ORDER MEMORIALIZING HEARING By Order of December 19, 2003, the Court ordered the parties to supplement the record by filing documentation relating to the "origin" of the term "separative work unit" and gave them
permission, if they so desire, also to file supplemental briefs. The parties hereby jointly respond to that order. We attach four documents as exhibits. The first exhibit is from the Federal Register of December 23, 1966, 31 FR 16479-81, entitled Atomic Energy Commission Uranium Enrichment Services. In the first paragraph, it defines the term "separative work"; in
"enrichment services," and, at note 1,
paragraph numbered 5, it states that the amount of enrichment services is to be "define[d] ... in terms of units of separative work" as related in a "standard table of enrichment services." We
believe this document is the origin of the term separative work
Case 1:96-cv-00407-LB
Document 17
Filed 01/15/2004
Page 2 of 2
unit.
The enrichment criteria set forth in this document were
later revised: the second exhibit is 10 CFR Part 762 (1992) which was the final revision of those criteria. The third exhibit is from the Federal Register of November 29, 1967, 32 FR 16289-91. It first set forth the standard table of
enrichment services and the charge per unit of separative work. The fourth exhibit is from the Federal Register of March 9, 1971, 36 FR 4563. It was, we believe, the final published revision of
the standard table of enrichment services that went into effect. The United States Enrichment Corporation's web site includes a page entitled "What is a SWU?" consideration of this web page. No party objects to the Court's It may be accessed at:
http://www.usec.com/v2001_02/HTML/Aboutusec_swu.asp No party desires to file a supplemental brief. Counsel for the plaintiffs has consented to filing of this document by defendant. Respectfully submitted, /s/ James G. Bruen, Jr. JAMES G. BRUEN, Jr. Special Litigation Counsel Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice P.O. Box 875 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 Tel: (202) 307-0493 Fax: (202) 307-0494 E-Mail: [email protected] Attorney for Defendant -2-
ERIC J. MARCOTTE Winston & Strawn 1400 L St., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Phone: (202) 371-5700 Fax: (202) 371-5950 E-Mail: [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiffs January 15, 2004 Filed Electronically
Case 1:96-cv-00407-LB
Document 17-2
Filed 01/15/2004
Page 1 of 4
EXHIBIT 1
Case 1:96-cv-00407-LB
Document 17-2
Filed 01/15/2004
Page 2 of 4
HeinOnline --- 31 Federal Register No. 248 page 16479 (1966)
Case 1:96-cv-00407-LB
Document 17-2
Filed 01/15/2004
Page 3 of 4
HeinOnline --- 31 Federal Register No. 248 page 16480 (1966)
Case 1:96-cv-00407-LB
Document 17-2
Filed 01/15/2004
Page 4 of 4
HeinOnline --- 31 Federal Register No. 248 page 16481 (1966)
Case 1:96-cv-00407-LB
Document 17-3
Filed 01/15/2004
Page 1 of 4
EXHIBIT 2
Case 1:96-cv-00407-LB
Document 17-3
Filed 01/15/2004
Page 2 of 4
Case 1:96-cv-00407-LB
Document 17-3
Filed 01/15/2004
Page 3 of 4
Case 1:96-cv-00407-LB
Document 17-3
Filed 01/15/2004
Page 4 of 4
Case 1:96-cv-00407-LB
Document 17-4
Filed 01/15/2004
Page 1 of 4
EXHIBIT 3
Case 1:96-cv-00407-LB
Document 17-4
Filed 01/15/2004
Page 2 of 4
HeinOnline --- 32 Federal Register No. 230 page 16289 (1967)
Case 1:96-cv-00407-LB
Document 17-4
Filed 01/15/2004
Page 3 of 4
HeinOnline --- 32 Federal Register No. 230 page 16290 (1967)
Case 1:96-cv-00407-LB
Document 17-4
Filed 01/15/2004
Page 4 of 4
HeinOnline --- 32 Federal Register No. 230 page 16291 (1967)
Case 1:96-cv-00407-LB
Document 17-5
Filed 01/15/2004
Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT 4
Case 1:96-cv-00407-LB
Document 17-5
Filed 01/15/2004
Page 2 of 2
HeinOnline --- 36 Federal Register No. 46 page 4563 (1971)