Free Response - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 361-2

Filed 07/07/2006

Page 1 of 1

Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. The United States [1] Table A: Summary of Total Costs with Adjustments per the Court's Order

Outside Services Labor "16 Employees" [3] Indirect Labor re "16 Employees" [3] Materials Materials Surcharge Other Non Cash Corporate Allocation Misc. Work Orders Total Costs

1/1/92 - 4/30/97 [2] 5/1/97 - 5/31/97 [2] 6/1/97 - 10/31/99 11/1/99 - 12/31/03 $ 10,146,644 $ (300,286) $ 9,375,646 $ 35,150,999 1,042,293 37,223 1,039,812 2,522,889 586,550 19,216 503,399 3,357,017 11,863 307,055 847,309 317,472 1,720 42,528 29,595 (833,363) 45,329 (33,553) 985,841 (1,220,964) 1,111,830 175,592 2,125 $ 15,728,444 $ (184,934) $ 11,410,479 $ 38,317,794

Total Costs 54,373,003 4,642,218 1,109,166 4,523,244 391,314 164,254 (1,220,964) 1,289,547 $ 65,271,783 $

Notes:
[1]

This table differs from the Summary of Total Costs presented in PX 1000 because the following items have been adjusted per the Court's Order dated March 31, 2006:

1. Direct labor only includes costs attributable to the "16 employees" who charged the majority of their time to the dual-purpose dry storage project. 2. Indirect labor only includes costs attributable to the "16 employees" before 11/1/99, a period in which there was no dispute between the financial experts as to their inclusion. 3. The category Indirect Labor after 11/1/99 (totaling $1,933,088) has been removed, along with the category Corporate Allocation (totaling $676,922), in accordance with the Court's Order relating to the exclusion of "Other Overhead Costs."
[2]

The Court's March 31, 2006 Order Requesting Supplemental Expert Testimony specifies the time periods 1/1/92 - 5/14/97 and 5/15/97 - 5/31/97.

FMIS data (all data prior to 11/1/99) does not include the month, day and year of each charge (FMIS only provides the month and year of each charge). Therefore, a month end cut off at April 30 and May 31 was used.
[3]

Includes total labor for the "16 employees" for the entire time period. Includes Indirect labor for the "16 employees" prior to 11/1/99, a period in which

there is no dispute between the financial experts as to their inclusion.

DRAFT