Free Published Opinion - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 43.9 kB
Pages: 2
Date: March 31, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 302 Words, 2,046 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/13052/354.pdf

Download Published Opinion - District Court of Federal Claims ( 43.9 kB)


Preview Published Opinion - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 354

Filed 03/31/2006

Page 1 of 2

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 98-488C Filed: March 31, 2006 TO BE PUBLISHED ************************************* * SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY * DISTRICT, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * * ************************************* ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT TESTIMONY Consistent with the March 31, 2006 Memorandum Opinion and Order issued, Plaintiff is ordered to submit Supplemental Direct Testimony from Mr. Brian P. Brinig, Brinig & Company, Inc., in the format of five tables and any supporting explanation: 1. Table A ­ a Summary of Costs by the categories listed in PX 1000 ¶ 20,1 for each of the following periods: January 1, 1992 through May 14, 1997; May 15, 1997 through May 31, 1997; June 1, 1997 through October 31, 1999; and November 1, 1999 through December 31, 2003. Table B ­ including cost data from Table A, minus any costs attributable to the "dual-purpose" transportable features of the dry storage system. Table C ­ including cost data from Table B, minus any costs attributable to a contract, lease, or other legal obligations executed by Plaintiff prior to May 15, 1997. Table D ­ including cost data from Table C, minus any costs attributable to onetwenty-second of the cost to construct the ISFSI. Table E ­ including cost data from Table D, minus Packaging Technologies and Vectra charges attributable to on-site drop testing.

2.

3.

4.

5.

The "Labor" category may include costs attributable to the 16 employees who charged the majority of their time to the "dual-purpose" dry storage project. An "Indirect Labor" category should not be included.

1

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 354

Filed 03/31/2006

Page 2 of 2

The court will convene a telephone conference on April 10, 2006 at 2:00 p.m. E.D.T. to discuss implementation of this Order, including the Government's oversight and verification of the data reported in the Tables. IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/SUSAN G. BRADEN Judge

2