Free Scheduling Order - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 20.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 257 Words, 1,752 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/13239/890.pdf

Download Scheduling Order - District Court of Federal Claims ( 20.3 kB)


Preview Scheduling Order - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 890

Filed 12/17/2004

Page 1 of 2

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 98-126C (Filed December 17, 2004) ******************************* YANKEE ATOMIC * ELECTRIC COMPANY, * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * Defendant. * ******************************* ORDER 1/ A telephone conference call was held, December 17, 2004, wherein parties agreed to extend the filing date for post-trial response briefs and responses to proposed findings of fact to, and including, January 10, 2005. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that post-trial response briefs and responses to proposed findings of fact shall be filed on or before January 10, 2005.

s/ James F. Merow

James F. Merow Senior Judge

This shall also be deemed applicable in Connecticut Yankee v. United States, No. 98-154 C and Maine Yankee v. United States, No. 98-474 C.

1/

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 890

Filed 12/17/2004

Page 2 of 2

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 98-126C (Filed December 17, 2004) ******************************* YANKEE ATOMIC * ELECTRIC COMPANY, * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * Defendant. * ******************************* ORDER 1/ A telephone conference call was held, December 17, 2004, wherein parties agreed to extend the filing date for post-trial response briefs and responses to proposed findings of fact to, and including, January 10, 2005. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that post-trial response briefs and responses to proposed findings of fact shall be filed on or before January 10, 2005.

s/ James F. Merow

James F. Merow Senior Judge

This shall also be deemed applicable in Connecticut Yankee v. United States, No. 98-154 C and Maine Yankee v. United States, No. 98-474 C.

1/