Free Notice (Other) - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 957.7 kB
Pages: 37
Date: February 8, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 705 Words, 5,515 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/13680/152-2.pdf

Download Notice (Other) - District Court of Federal Claims ( 957.7 kB)


Preview Notice (Other) - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 1 of 37

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ......................................................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND..................................................................................................2 ARGUMENT...................................................................................................................................4 I. THE UNITED STATES WAIVED ANY DEFENSE OF ESTOPPEL OR LACHES BY FAILING TO PLEAD EITHER DEFENSE IN A RESPONSIVE PLEADING AS REQUIRED BY RCFC RULE 8(C)....................4 A. B. The United States Failed to Plead the Defenses of Estoppel and Laches ..........................................................................................................4 The United States Has No Valid Basis for Injecting Its Unpled Defenses into this Case on the Eve of Trial .................................................5 1. 2. 3. II. The United States Should Not Be Permitted to Amend Its Pleadings to Assert Laches or Estoppel ...........................................5 The United States' Laches and Estoppel Defenses Implicate New Issues Not Previously Raised in this Case...............................7 The United States' Assertion of a Laches Defense in the 550 Case Cannot Import Laches into this Case ...............................8

THE UNITED STATES' UNCLEAN HANDS PREVENT IT FROM TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE EQUITABLE DEFENSES OF LACHES AND ESTOPPEL ..................................................................................10 CONGRESS'S DETERMINATION IN THE APPROPRIATIONS ACTS THAT CLAIMS DO NOT ACCRUE UNTIL AN ACCOUNTING IS RENDERED BARS APPLICATION OF LACHES AND ESTOPPEL TO THIS CASE ...........................................................................................................12

III.

CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................17 EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Answer, Osage Nation v. United States (Fed. Cl. Nov. 1, 1999) (Case No. 99-550L) .......................................................................................................3 Exhibit 2: Answer to Third Amended Complaint, Osage Nation v. United States (Fed. Cl. Nov. 8, 2004) (Case No. 99-550L) ...............................................................13 Exhibit 3: Answer to Complaint in No. 00-169L, Osage Nation v. United States (Fed. Cl. July 7, 2000) (Case No. 00-169L) ................................................................28

ii

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 2 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 3 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 4 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 5 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 6 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 7 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 8 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 9 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 10 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 11 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 12 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 13 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 14 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 15 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 16 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 17 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 18 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 19 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 20 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 21 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 22 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 23 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 24 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 25 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 26 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 27 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 28 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 29 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 30 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 31 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 32 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 33 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 34 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 35 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 36 of 37

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 152-2

Filed 02/08/2006

Page 37 of 37