Free Response - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 143

Filed 02/02/2006

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) ) ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) THE OSAGE NATION AND/OR TRIBE OF INDIANS OF OKLAHOMA,

Electronically Filed February 2, 2006 No. 99-550 L (into which has been consolidated No. 00-169 L) Judge Emily C. Hewitt

PLAINTIFF OSAGE NATION'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PRESENT SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE BY DEPOSITION In response to the United States' Motion for Leave to Present Substantive Evidence by Deposition, Plaintiff Osage Nation notes that many of the deposition excerpts identified by the United States omit testimony that is necessary to clarify, place in context or accurately state the witness's testimony. Accordingly, the United States' deposition designations should not be admitted without including the excerpts identified on Exhibit A attached hereto. Dated this February 2, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

s/Wilson K. Pipestem WILSON K. PIPESTEM Pipestem Law Firm, P.C. 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 419-3526 Fax: (202) 659-4931 [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiff Osage Nation

Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH

Document 143

Filed 02/02/2006

Page 2 of 2

EXHIBIT A DEPONENT Jim Gray FROM (Page:Line) 18:22 19:13 117:4 117:21 118:9 122:17 69:18 71:18 85:24 88:5 132:22 134:14 150:9 199:11 225:25 232:9 12:16 17:14 53:21 79:18 92:12 94:19 120:11 122:1 136:24 179:13 181:1 TO (Page:Line) 18: 25 19:17 117:7 117:23 119:17 123:10 69:25 72:6 87:8 88:9 134:7 134:24 150:18 199:17 226:4 236:14 12:21 17:15 54:13 80:16 93:14 95:8 120:25 122:5 141:1 180:4 187:21

Newell Barker

Bob Fox

2