SEC
Info
Coram Healthcare Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR For 9/30/99 10-Q Document Corp
124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
IN---I
Page 1 of 30 Page
Just
34 of 55
10-Q
19thPageof
ITOCllstI
Previous
19th
that it terminated the The Company received notice from Aetna 15% respectively for infusion services effective 2000 April 12 April 1998 national agreement did not intend to renew The received notice from Aetna that Aetna CPS division its on agreement September The have the the with CPS that was scheduled to expire in accordance with its terms
30
1999
of the Master the Agreement and related Aetna that with dispute Network division refuses are to serviced the Aetna and may in
termination
effects on negative business infusion Companys services rendered or Agreement business doing with with the fees
other
Com lys
Resource
if
Master
by Coram to Aetna if Aetna causes its with
for example enrollees newly
for pay claims outside the affiliates
to
acquired cannot
Prudential
cease the dispute dispute
Coram
The but could
Aetna
Aetna
may have the Company
Company if the incur
predict in does not prevail Company additional substantial losses
ultimate
impact its
Further
legal
Company associated
that it will continue to incur significant anticipates with with pursuing the litigation related to the dispute
Aetna
Other currently are
as
Factors affecting
Results Affecting Recent Operating the Companys operating performance
Other and
factors significant financial condition
follows
restructure of its credit in facilities through the of its repayment of its former exchange Notes and the Series Credit Facility to the in the
former Notes August Series Exchange Series
senior in June Notes
credit debt for
subordinated 1998
facility January 1998 the issuance of the Series establishment of the of the conversion
1998
the
the
New
Senior
and
setting
Securities contemplated by the April 1999 offset the increased interest rate applicable to the Agreement by Notes also included in such April 1999 amendment expansion and improved sales efforts in
price applicable amendment to the
ii
division
Cornpans
CPS
iii
result
of
to managed competition
in the Companys infusion business as ongoing pricing pressure insurers an unfavorable shift in payor mix from private indemnity and other contracted care organizations payors and intense sets net forth revenue the from
table infusion The following among providers of the Compys infusion percentages therapy approximate certain of- payors categories
Download THREE
Table
MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 1999
30
1999
Private Payors
Indemnity
Insurance
and
Other Other
NonContracted
21% 23%
54% 23%
Care Managed and Medicare
and Organizations Medicaid Programs
Contracted
Payors
57%
22% 100%
Total
100%
iv
increased
to increase sought facilities and offices
competition the scope of
and physicians that hospitals services their they offer through offered services similar to those including
from
have the
by
http//www.secinfo.com/dsvrp.69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 51
SEC
Info
Coram Healthcare Corp Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR 10-Q Company
or that have
For 9/30/99 entered
Document 124-6
into
Filed 04/17/2007
have care relationships been delegated
Page 2 of 30 Page
with control the over
35 of 55
riskbearing
third-party payors the provision of services offered increased related by
to which they pursuant of health wide variety the
services
including
Compy
as
and
clinical well of that
staffing
increased
delivery
costs of
oncall
and
other and
volume
costs
as
certain
blood
blood
derivative
increasing and the increasing the On the with products October chronic this that
products numbers
are in short supply that have been required by the served infusion division by the Companys patients the therapies numbers of patients that require receiving are in short supply the Company received drug notice by that the Bayer
26
of
1999
Corporation
manufacturer
ProlastinR
furnished
condition called alphal antitrypsin of this drug to all traditional the drug suppliers including and end users of the product that the Company Bayer informed the Company would only be available an exclusive distribution product through source the three and nine months by Bayer During ended sponsored 30 September selling
18
to persons Company would cease defiency
http //www.secinfo.comldsvrp.69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 52
SEC
Info
Coram Healthcare Corp Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR 10-Q
For 9/30/99
Document 124-6
1st
Filed 04/17/2007
Next
services
Page 3 of 30 Page
Just
million
36 of 55
20th
1999
and to has
Page
of
29
sales of
Previous
and related
Bottom
were $2.1
20th
revenues $6.6
from
ProlastinR
Because
million
ProlastinR
transition been
is the only source for Bayer the Company has been forced to make arrangements with its patients their service to Bayer once the Companys supply of ProlastinR
respectively
depleted
The
distribution Results Three of
programs Operations Ended 1998 Net
has learned that Bayer may implement similar Company for other it manufactures GamimuneR drugs including
Months
September
30
1999
Compared
With
Three
Months
Ended
September Net million quarter million the in net
30
unaudited
revenue ended decreased September 1998 The Master $0.4 million from
is
Revenue
in the ended
or
0.3%
to
$143.2 in the
quarter
30
1999
$143.6
million
September decrease in net of from the the revenue in
30
Aetna
decrease
revenue infusion
from the business by
RNet
and
termination
Agreement
due to primarily $14.0 division primarily relating to and $12.7 million increase
ii
CPS
division sales
due
to
an See
overall
increase
Affecting
Gross gross or
served generated patients Recent Results Operating Profit
of Gross
internal
growth
Factors
margin gross
23.0%
margin of
Recent
decreased million to $32.9 million or $2.3 profit the quarter ended 30 1999 from $35.2 million September 24.5% in the quarter ended ptember 30 1998 See Factors in
Affecting
Operating and
Results
Administrative quarter
Selling
or to 13.2% the to million with
General
Expenses
ended
$28.3
million in the
in the quarter ended 30 September of the CPS division as well growth the dispute with Aetna See Factors AffectingRecent Interest
SGA increased $3.3 million 30 1999 from $25.0 September 1998 The increase is due primarily as fees incurred in conjunction legal
Operating
Results
Expense
three of ended
million the addition increase
in of in
the months
months $22.5
three
increased by $2.0 million to $8.1 expense ended 30 1999 from $6.1 million during September to the 30 1998 The increase is attributable September million on the Senior Credit the in
Interest
draws the
Facility
Series the
Subordinated outstanding change on The Series the
amount principal outstanding Unsecured Notes $1.8 million the Series Notes Senior from Series 9.875% to
under
$8.3 Senior
million
increase 11.5%
under
Subordinated
Unsecured beginning
amount principal and rate Notes on
pfjl
1999
period the Company Unaudited
that interest due related to the Series and anticipates Company notes will be reduced the six month $13 million over by as much as November result of the preliminary beginning 15 1999 as understanding has reached with the Holders Financial of Condensed Income the Consolidated such notes Statements an See Note to the
Operating million income during of $3.6
Loss
months
The
Company
had
operating
loss compared
of
$7.3
to operating The and the
three
ended
million during the ended 30 1998 September decline is due primarily to the decrease in gross profit of $2.4 million in SGA of $3.3 increase million as described above
September three months
30
1999
Costs The Comppy recorded cost of Restructuring plan restructuring in the amount the third quarter of $5.1 million associated with the of the RNet divisions New reorganization Whippany Jersey call center
during
operations
Net million discussed
Loss
compared
Net to
loss
for the
$2.8
decline
quarter million for can be
ended the
Sptember
ended the
30
1999
was
$15.2
1998
As
above
the
quarter attributed to
September decrease in
30
operating
hap //www
secinfo.com/dsvrp
69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 53
SEC
Info
Coram Healthcare Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR Corp 10-Q
income and the increase in
For 9/30/99 interest
Document 124-6
expense
Filed 04/17/2007
See
Page 4 of 30 Page
Recent
37 of 55
Factors
Affecting
Operating Nine
Results
Months Ended September
30
1999
Compared
With
Nine
Months
Ended
September Net million nine
301998
Net
unaudited
increased $88.5 The
19
Revenue
in the ended
revenue
million 1999
is
or
24.0%
$368.5
to
$457.0 in the
nine
months
ended
September30
1998
from
million
months
September
30
increase
http
//www.secinfo
.conildsvrp.69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 54
SEC
Info
Coram Healthcare Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR Corp 10-Q
For 9/30/99
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
Page 5 of 30 Page
Just
38 of 55
1O-Q
21st
Page
of
Previous
21st
due to $26.9 million increase in net revenue from the infusion primarily and partially business due to 5.5% increase in patient offset primarily census shift in payor mix $32.2 million increase in net revenue by an unfavorable from the RNet division of the Aetna primarily relating to the termination
ii
Master
iii
an
that was terminated effective June Agreement subsequently $28.9 million increase in net revenue from the CPS division number of patients
30
1999 growth
and from See
resulting
increased
served
generated
by
internal
sales
Factors
Affecting_Recent
Operating
Results
$16.1 ended million to $77.0 million or
Gross gross margin million or The decrease
Profit
of
Gross in
30 1999 from $93.1 September of 25.3% in the nine months ended gross margin 30 1998 September results primarily from the increase in net revenue discussed
Infusion with number current Recent the by and the CPS
16.9%
decreased profit the nine months
above
service
in the with caused
divisions
Master
offset
by
an
increase
in cost that
of
associated
Aetna
Agreement
variable
costs
fluctuate supplies
of patients costs of drugs served and higher market of certain blood products shortages Operating
and See
Factors
Affecting
Results
or
and Administrative Selling General Expenses ended 17.1% to $80.8 million in the nine months million in the nine months fees ended infusion incurred September growth
as
SGA
increased
$11.8 1999 and
million from
is
$69.0
30
September 1998 The
30
increase
due CPS
to the primarily division well as Expenses with costs office with increased
of the
business
in
R-Net
division
the
legal
associated
primarily with additional and legal
from
business fees Recent
with the Aetna conjunction dispute for salary and benefits along growth such as additional rent for personnel incurred in conjunction with the dispute Operating an
space telephone Aetna See Factors
Income the nine million
Affecting
The
Results
loss of to
Operating million during income of $4.6 decrease $16.1 ended in
Loss
months
operating coupled
during income is with an
had Company ended September the nine months
operating
$30.8
1998
operating The
3Q
ended
199
compared
million
September
due primarily to increase of $11.8
September the decline million in
30
in
SGA
of gross profit for the quarter
30
1999
Costs The Company recorded Restructuring approximately $0.9 million of in March 1999 relating to reorganization of the Companys charges management the first quarter structure of 1999 completed the third quarter during During of 1999 the Company recorded costs of of plan in t-he amount restructuring
$5.1 million New associated Jersey with call the reorganization
of
the
R-Netdivisions
Whippany
center
operations
expense decreased by $4.2 million to $22.2 1999 from $26.4 million during
is
Interest million the nine decrease cancelled $3.2 in of in the months
Expense
nine ended
Interest ended
months
September
30
$10.3 in by
30 1998 The September million in interest related
with the Securities to the the relating related to Unaudited
decrease to the
due
Rollover
to primarily which was Note
connection interest interest to
million offset
Exchange Agreement Warrants issued under Exchange Consolidated
and the
decrease Rollover
of
of
Note
Securities
million See Statements
The
Note
the
Condensed
Agreement Financial
$7.1
that interest due related to the Series and anticipates Company notes will be reduced the six month as $13 million over by as much November 15 1999 as result of the preliminary period beginning understanding the Company has reached with the Holders of such notes See Note to the Series Unaudited Net recognized Condensed Consolidated the of nine Financial months ended
Statements
September to
Loss
During net loss
30
net
1999
loss
the of
Company
$53.5
million
compared
$22.5
http /www.secinfo.comldsvrp.69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 55
SEC
Info
Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR -Coram Healthcare Corp 10-Q
million decline offset during can be by the nine in attributed to
For 9/30/99 ended the
Document 124-6
September
in
Filed 04/17/2007
30
1998
As income operating
Page 6 of 30 Page
above
the
39 of 55
months
discussed
decrease
loss
Recent
partially
decrease
interest
expense
See
Factors_Affecting
Operating Liquidity The the New
Results
and Capital Resources credit under from operations and available generated its working and to fund capital requirements as of September 30 1999 was $70.1 working capital million months
at
uses Company Senior Credit The to the
cash
Fadility
operations
million
Companys
$64.6 nine
compared During assets
December September
20
million
in current
ended
an increase of $5.5 31 1998 the primary increases 30 1999
http
//www
secinfo.comldsvrp.69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 56
SEC
Info
Coram Healthcare Corp Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR 10-Q
For 9/30/99
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007 IN--I
of $8.4
Page 7 of 30 Page
40 of 55
1O-Q
22ndPage oE29
related increase to in net an increase accounts
ITOCI15tI
in cash and
of
Previous
cash $12.5 sales
Just 22nd
million
due and to an
equivalents
ii
an
receivable
million
primarily
in approximate eight day increase sales volume the CPS division at
days and cash the
iii
million and
outstanding decrease in
DSO
additional
million
The
increase net of
in
cash
and on
borrowings
repayments
was equivalents New Senior Credit for
of $8.4 inventory due to primarily
Facility
consisted of $2.8 equipment purchases $1.8 million for furniture equipment durable in the accounts medical nine equipment ended months
of
computer current
improvements
Total
and Property and software systems and the purchase of liabilities increased in
for $2.1
million
restructuring As of
payable costs
$2.7 of
30 1999 primarily due to an increase September million and an increase in accrued and merger
million
the Company did not have any material
$2.7
September
30
1999
commitments
for capital Under available amount pursuant
expenditures
the to to the terms of the New of
or
Senior
as
the
equal to
Company the lesser agreement
defined
the
the the
Facility the maximum funds Credit Commitment -is an Revolving base as calculated Companys borrowing Companys
the total
as
Credit
total
million As of $59.3 million
revolver Senior Credit
September Offset by of
30
1999
of
the
letter $19.8
credit
credit commitment of $60.0 Credit Commitment was Revolving of $2.5 million and obligations revolving available credit under the New of
borrowings
$37.0 was
million
15
the 1999 $37.0 amount which includes in delivered
1999 As of October Facility Septernber30 Credit Commitment was $60.0 million Of that Companys Revolving the New Senior Credit Facility million had been drawn against
million $14.5 accordance million with that had been relating to the letters of credit the Aetna Master In addition after Agreement $2.5 million the totaling obligations $20.5 million as of October 15 1999 As with certain financial compliance debt The Company has agreements
the other letters of credit deducting under the facility is total available
of
and has
September 301999 the Company was not in other covenants set forth in its principal waivers reached
with In addition the Coinppy regard to such noncompliance an understanding with its lenders to which they have waived pursuant for with certain covenants under the New Senior Credit Facility non-compliance the period December 1999 The understanding also includes ending 31 provisions
received
whereby
period from
no
interest
would 1999
be
due
on the
the
Series of
and
Series
Notes
for the of the
November
15
though
earlier
final
resolution
with Aetna certain from the or litigation Nay 15 2000 and proceeds sale of any Company assetoutside of the ordinary course of business would be of the Series and the Series to redemption notes at applied partial par such amounts as the Holders of the Series and Series Notes designate of the proceeds that such derived from such application provided under the New Senior Credit by the lenders Facility The precise understanding have not be been finalized under violations and such there can be no will understanding further to whether and to whether the any Unaudited finalized sale
is
ii
in
waived
terms of such that such assurance be no in assurance future See
as
terms
There
can
covenant
necessary Condensed
will occur or defaults waivers will be forthcoming at that Consolidated Financial Statements
time
periods Note
The expected Agreement by $14.5 estimate nature to the business of
has experienced on liquidity due to the higher Company pressure costs of service described above with to the Master as respect and of
than debt
Aetnas
draws
on
letters
of has to be
credit
that
increased
million
all of
the Company Although service costs related
to record sought the Master Agreement no assurance that
good due
outstanding faith to
is
the amount and
uncertainties all assess
litigation
costs can
there be
can
the
exact
such
the impact of the revised for plan and formulating plans Master Agreement The Company is considering any needed liquidity including
identified The presently Master Agreement The Companjj
operations strategic
Company is also and
continuing its reviewing flow its without
to
cash with
alternatives
provide
possible
transaction
CPS
http//www.secinfo.com/dsvrp.69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 57
SEC
Info
Coram Healthcare Corp Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR 10-Q division
needed There can on be no
For 9/30/99
Document 124-6
that acceptable
Filed 04/17/2007
Company will be able
Page 8 of 30 Page
to obtain any
41
of 55
assurance
liquidity The
commercially the
terms
is
the
believes Company effect such issues of any the effects of could failure manner
most have
While in down the
all
may of such
risk with the Year 2000 problem significant on third party payors such as Medicare have not been identified noncompliance by the party
Company
these impact
third the
of accounts receivable payment can has not incurred issues to date which management Company any payment in connection with attribute to the Year 2000 problem directly any specific
timely in the
Companys
to resolve Year 2000 problems payors due to slow capital availability associated with these payors While
payor
no
21
http //www.secinfo.comldsvrp.69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 58
SEC
Info
Coram Healthcare Corp Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR 10-Q
For 9/30/99
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
Next
occur
Such
Page 9 of 30 Page
Just
42 of 55
110Q
have
23rdPageof29
assurance operations Credit Year New 2000 2000 Senior can and be made adverse require that material
ITOC1stI
payment effect on Company issues the to
Previous
will not
23rd
Cornpgys
use
the
ability to available capital
an impact cash generate from the New
could from Senior
Facility
available
accounts receivable due to delays in collecting could reduce the capital problems experienced by third party payors the borrowing base under the terms of the to the Compy by reducing Significant Credit could $6.7
Facility
impact
In
problem Of the 36%
the
addition Companys
such
ability
delays due payment to meet its debt restructure
to
the
Year
obligations
the Company
million of remaining
future cash September and 2002
accrued
17%
costs
in the
estimates
that
the
expenditures
will
be
made
following
periods
through Although
through
30
30%
2000
through September
September
30
and
through to future and the Companys subject adjustment ability to successfully its business the Company believes it has implement strategy reserves adequate and liquidity of September related as 301999 to meet future expenditures to the that
gpember 30
30
2003
17% 2001 thereafter
plans
the
However
Company
there
is
no
assurance sufficient
that
the
reserves capital
will
be
will
generate
working
to meet
adequate future
or
expenditures
Year 2000 Issues Some in this
Background
programming result As or fail to
as
computers
calendar
software
and
other
is
code of
which design correct 2000
year data decision some of results
if
include equipment abbreviated to only two systems could to mean fail to
digits
operate rather
than
2000
produce These problems the
00
these
is
are
severity
Millennium
Bug
year or The
Year
Year
expected widely and are approaches 2000 Problem 2000 Problem could
interpreted to increase commonly
1900
in frequency and referred to as the
Assessment
other equipment
affect the
used
is reviewing Company the programs and systems
or operated its internal
maintained by
computer Year 2000 Company
softwae computers Company Accordingly
and systems to ensure
and the that
programs
will
be The
compliant
believes software that
it
Internal substantially used equipment
Infrastructure
all in of the
has
identified and related
major computers connection with its internal
applications
upgraded business
identified
or The
replaced Company upgrade
modification
as
that must be modified operations to minimize the possibility of material to its disruption of activity the majority relL-ated to the hascompleted or replacement of all major systems that have been affected and by Year for
completed branch payroll
collections the R-Net
adversely fully tested
2000
asset
systems
date tracking
To
all
work
has
been
general
accounting
operations
support pharmacy
and inventory operational division for billing and collections are compliant Systems and the CPS division for both the pharmacy benefit management systems have been completed locations have been upgraded areas Company of to complete remediation final include
including are fully
adrnissions
pharmacy billing management and in compliance Systems for that mail order
Equipment call for the
the Home Medical Systems that support and are also in operation Current plans remediation systems by September 30 the upgrade of the Resource Network
of our inventory management communications hardware and
1999
minor or
These
claims- adjudication system final deployment software to our data upgrades turnkey replacement of personal computer equipment
system
that
does
not
support
upgrade Year 2000
calculations Suppliers
At the end of
1998
the
to major suppliers six months of 1999 issues control involving over the
identify any potential the Compy reviewed Year 2000 of these
communicated with its Company formally adverse situations the first During these and worked to resolve responses has limited or no
it
the
actions
the Company problem However while the suppliers Thus
Company
believes
http//www.secinfo.com/dsvrp.69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 59
SEC
Info
Coram Healthcare Corp Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR 10-Q
has be with resolved no of all its
For 9/30/99
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
Page 10 of 30Page
43 of 55
assurance with the
any Problems effect on
Year 2000 Problems with these significant suppliers there can these will resolve suppliers any or all Year 2000 Problems customers Any failure of these suppliers to resolve Year 2000 that systems could have timely manner financial and business condition in material results
of
their
adverse
Companys
operations
Third believes Management Party Payors for the Year2000 Problem is the that effect the most significant risk to
jpman
third agencies party of
such
as Medicare News reports have are having Year 2000 government difficulty becoming before the Year 2000 The Company has not yet undertaken compliant of the effects of such whether quantification noncompliance or to determine
payors
the
such
may have on indicated that various
issues
federal
such
quantification
is
even
possible
The
Company
22
has
communicated
http //www.secinfo.comldsvrp.69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 60
SEC
Info
Coram Healthcare Corp Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR 10-Q
For 9/30/99
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
Next
Page 11 of 30Page
Bottom
44 of 55
24th
with its
Page
of
to payors Year 2000 of able be with 2000 no of to identify
Previous and
Just 24th
third
issues
involving the control over
party the
Problem
actions
these
to the extent to resolve possible the Company has limited or no However third party payors while the Company Thus Year 2000 Problems with any significant will resolve that these any or payors the occurrence of material systems before
that it will be expects these payors there can all Year 2000 to Problems the Year adverse disruption to payors have and
resolve
assurance the
their
business
Company
with th
resolve of
Problems on
material results
effect
third party Any failure of these their systems in manner could timely financial business condition cpmariys
operations Costs
is using internal and Company and implement the software and under this project The total cost
Remediation reprogram modifications remediation operating Company
or
The
external
resources 2000
to
replace
required
test
equipment of the Year
funded through is estimated at $0.8 million and is being project cash flows As of the nine months ended ptember 30 1999 the incurred these
as
had Of
process
costs
capitalized remediation estimate Company
is as
new
to this remediation $0.6 million related approximately and $0.2 million was $0.5 million has been expensed or software All of the remaining estimated equipment
of $0.1 million relate to equipment and monitored and will be revised in future being additional information becomes available
costs
software
public
This by the
filings
--
Plans The Companys focus in the area of contingency is Contingency plans on the development of plans to ensure the continuation of patient care primarily in the event of system failures related to Year 2000 that are beyond our control The types of contingencies for which plans are being include developed
local telephone system
failures
of of its
local
power
grid
In
failures
and
inadequacy/unavailability that remediation believes of September
medical
supplies
internal
30
1999
contingency
are personnel appropriate event of an unanticipated
immediately
plans available
the Company although was substantially as systems complete have also been developed to ensure
addition
to
address
any
situation
in
the
failure
believes that it is not possible to determine with Management complete have been that all Year 2000 Problems the Company identified certainty affecting or corrected The number of devices that could be affected and the interactions among these devices are simply many herein too
numerous
how accurately predict the severity duration information under the set forth 2000 Care Year Health recent
Year
is
2000
Problems
In addition the Company related failures will of
cannot occur or
orfinancial
consequences designed as and Readiness
Year
any inevitable 2000 Readiness Act of
Information
Disclosure
failures TheDisclosure 1998
Future In
Proposals
and
Legislation
introduced major
an increasing number of legislative initiatives have been years in Congress and in state legislatures that would effect or proposed in the health care or at the state changes system either nationally Various forms of payment by law bidding into
level
competitive reductions Clinton which $115
market
and the
in Medicare
consideration including and abuse and further expanded legislation Medicaid reimbursement On gust President 1997
fraud Balanced Act of 1997 the 1997 Budget Budget in Medicare and Medicaid of more than spending over five years is respectively Congress
control
are
under
signed
Act-
for reductions provides billion and $13 billion
presently
to
among
providers reductions direct medical the
that would provide limited financial relief considering legislation certain home health and skilled others hospital nursing facility that and home medical suppliers experienced equipment payment under for the 1997 entities Budget such fee
Act
as
In particular Company
relief
equipment
DME
the
schedule
would provide one proposal an update in the durable through to suppliers under Part of applicable
Medicare
program
http //www.secinfo
comldsvrp.69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 61
SEC
Info
Coram Healthcare Corp Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR 10-Q
For 9/30/99
Document 124-6
Administration rates The in of for
Filed 04/17/2007
Page 12 of 30Page
45 of 55
The that
Health
would
equipment is intended
Care Financing reimbursement change and supplies to be for budget
at
HCFA
PEN
neutral lower The
parenteral
rule recently proposed and enteral nutrients
reimbursement
rates
the
rule states that it to the proposed preamble its first year of application but would set the applicable rates paid in 1995 or 1998 the represent reimbursement for primary therapies from the Medicare
adjusted
which the
inflation
therapy
PEN
infusion
division
therapies receives
program
HCFA Act also to its proposed exercising Medicare fee schedule adjust has expanded amounts under the 1997 authority deems to be that the agency
Budget not inherently
reasonable
Under
this
23
http //www.secinfo
.comldsvrp.69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 62
SEC
Info
Coram Healthcare Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR Corp 10-Q
For 9/30/99
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
INexti
Page 13 of 30Page
Bottom
of if
46 of 55
25thPageof29
authority
providing comment
is
ITOI1st
contractors reductions
Previous
Just
25th
HCFA
or
its
limited
notice
may impose payment in excess of 15%
reductions can be made
up to 15% by notice and
criteria
payment would In
in the Federal and HCFA meets certain other provided Register In an August 1999 notice HCFA proposed inherent reasonableness reductions from 22% to 57% for six items of DME orthotics ranging
is considering that supplies Congress currently proposals or postpone HCFAs use of this inherent reasonableness authority the 1997 Budget authorized Act HCFA to conduct up to five
prosthetics addition
is
and
restrict
The first competitive projects bidding Florida using payment rates that are County lower than Medicares fee schedule for five existing of medical and supplies enteral nutrition categories including equipment and supplies second also covering products competitive bidding project is now being planned competitive bidding project between underway and 31% 13%
in
demonstration Polk
DME
The this will be
impact
of
time Moreover
adopted
reductions on the Company cannot be any payment the Company cannot whether predict any pending No assurance that the implementation can be given
or legislative on the business
determined proposals of the 1997 not have
at
Act or any other Budget material adverse effect ITEM The changes that are AND
initiatives regulatory of the Company ABOUT MARKET
will
QUANTITATIVE
QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES
RISK
risk could not related to
discusses the Companys following in interest rates This discussion subject
as
exposure contains Actual
to market results
forwardlooking
statements
to
risks of
and and
uncertainties
of those set
materially in changes Discussion Background As million annum 8.0%
result
number
factors
forth
interest and
--
rates
but including under Item
vary limited
to
Managements
Operations
of Financial Condition and Results of Analysis Factors Affecting Recent Results Operating
of gptember the Company had odtstanding debt of $289.7 30 1999 of which $162.2 million matures in May 2001 bears interest 11.5% per at and $89.7 million matures in April 2008 and bears interest at the rate of
per
annum
On
October
15
and due
1999
$1.8
Series
approximately cash payment Senior The rate New Credit
$4.7 million of interest Facility
million
such of in
providing
through for the letters matures was
and Series Notes totaling were issued in lieu respectively date The Company also has New of up to $60.0 other corporate and bears an As million
of for
acquisitions
working Senior Credit plus
capital
Facility which amount
availability credit and
as
purposes
interest of November
15
was
of prime the 1999
1.5%
9.75%
2001 February of October
15
1999
pmpys
would not have
under the New Senior Credit Facility outstanding $37.0 million Because all of the interest on approximately substantially debt is fixed 10.0% decrease in interest rates hypothetical principal material in interest on the Company Increases rates impact interest associated with future borrowings by expenses does not hedge interest rate changes against Company PART OTHER
II
increase could however the Company if any The
INFORMATION
ITEM
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
of the material to which the Company is Descriptions legal proceedings Unaudited Condensed are set forth in Note to the Comppjiys Consolidated party Financial Statements
cppApy
the normal course
of
is
also its other
party
to
of
business
actions
resolution
such
various other actions legal arising out believes that the ultimate Management will not have material effect adverse on
of the
http//www.secinfo
.comldsvrp.69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 63
SEC
Info
Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR Coram Bealthcare Corp 10-Q
financial
For 9/30/99
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
Page 14 of 30Page
47 of 55
of the Company or liquidity position results of operations due to the uncertainties inherent in litigation the ultimate Nevertheless of these.actions cannot be determined disposition presently ITEM Not CHANGE IN SECURITIES
ND
USE
OF
PROCEEDS
applicable
24
http
//www
secinfo
comldsvrp
69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 64
SEC
Info
Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR Coram Healthcare Corp 10-Q
26th
ITEM
For 9/30/99
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
Page 15 of 30Page
Bottom
Just
48 of 55
1O-Q
Page
of
UPON of SENIOR certain SECURITIES matters to such of potential defaults principal set forth and
26th
DEFAULTS discussion
noncompliance
and
with the
certain waivers
covenants received
contained
in the
Companys
is
Companys
ITEM The consider
Unaudited SUBMISSION
relating Condensed
matters
agreements in Note to the
debt
Consolidated
Financial
Statements
OF
MPTTERS
TO
VOTE
OF
SECURITY of
HOLDERS on August 1999 to
held its Company and vote upon Election of
Annual
Meeting
Stockholders
directors their
to
serve
until are
the
2000
Annual and
Meeting
of
Stockholders
and
until of
successors to the
duly
elected
qualified
Certificate shares from of of
Approval -Incorporatiog the Companys
as
an
amendment to value
Companys
number
Restated
of
amended
par
increase common
the stock
authorized
$.00l
the
Common
Stock
100000000
to
150000000
certain to four shares to purchase of the options directors of the Company Richard Pagliuca and Peter
Common William
of Approval Stock granted
Companys Fink
Casey
and
Stephen
Smith.on
September
1998
Ratification independent All proposals auditors were
of
the
of the
of Ernst appointment Young of the Companys 1999 Company The results of the voting are
LLP
as
fiscal
as
year
approved
follows
Table
Enlarge/Download
TOTAL VOTE FOR DIRECTOR TOTAL WITHHELD VOTE
FROM
EACH
EACH
DIRECTOR
For
election
as
director
Donald William Stephen Richard Richard Peter
2\maral
Casey Feinberg Fink Smith Smith
39952129 40057928 39560382 40036126 40039936 40046634
1638010 1532211 2029757 1554013 1550203 1543505 Download Table
FOR
AGAINST
ABSTAIN
BROKER NON-VOTE
Approval
of
the
amendment
of
the of
Companys
Restated certain of the
Certificate to options the Companys
Incorporation of Approval purchase Common Ernst ITEM On Donald interim
http
38355670
2966475 3680313
418363
248111
19833
Shares Stock of
37677435
appointment of LLP
232391
Ratification Young OTHER October Amaral basis
40640610
531166
INFORNTION
29
1999
the the
would
serve
as
announced that its Chairman of the Board Company the Companys Chief Executive Officer on an of Richard Smith
as
following
departure
the
Companys
Chief 4/15/2007
//www
secinfo.comldsvrp.69Te.htm
Al 65
SEC
Info
Coram Healthcare Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR 10-Q Corp
Executive the with Board the The Officer of and of
For 9/30/99
Document 124-6
Mr
Smith and
Filed 04/17/2007
Page 16 of 30Page
on
49 of 55
President
Directors
Comppys
subsidiaries
pqy
his position resigned subsequently all other offices and directorships
NYSE
received letter from Compapy dated October 201999 informing
the the
New
York
Stock
Exchange
criteria for the new NYSE minimum share price of
that it was Company minimum share price continued listing stock had traded below gmpanys
25
Inc below
the
The
standard
http
//www
secinfo
comldsvrp.69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 66
SEC
Info
Coram Healthcare Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR Corp 10-Q
For 9/30/99
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
Page 17 of 30Page
Just
50 of 55
1O-Q
$1.00 1999 value this the
27th
over to
Page
30
of
trading-day stock trading result
27th
period
above
The the
Comppy
$1.00 to
has
six months both in the
from of
October absolute
20
raise the
the
30
price
level of for
terms stock and
and
period Securities
would
day average in immediate Commission less As of not
Failure
restore
price
within
suspension
and an
Exchange not will
SEC
trading NYSE in
delisting
new each
to application The NYSEs letter listing
further
included
early warning
requirement and market Form and
to maintain the
the regarding than $50 million the of the this
continued
stockholders
September listing
capitalization
Company
lO-Q
filing comply with notice
Compys
Exchange
30
equity 1999
continued
anticipates receiving the Company must notice demonstrates within review
18
another
from the
within 45 days with respond with these continued listing compliance months of receipt of that notice Committee
at
requirement of this Upon receipi business that plan standards no later than of this be the time will Exchange the Company will business plan or to trading
to required within 45 days it
the plan accept plan and will either be subject to quarterly for compliance monitoring will not accept the business plan and the Company the and delisting suspension by the issue release regarding press of has for
which
with will the
subject
SEC Additionally
the receipt has considered its of this CPS
is Company second letter
receipt
submit
Accordingly
the the
Company
certain
would
including other investigated the continued on the no
sale of possible alternatives trading of its common stock
division
no
of aspects plan to the NYSE and
trading
for Company if it is
common
stock
to
allow for
longer
eligible
trading
NYSE
While results Company ITEM
assurances can be given the Company believes that successful alternatives described in this document would allow strategic to maintain its listing with the NYSE from AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
the
EXHIBITS Exhibits
Download
Table
EXHIBIT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7
27
--
Letter
Amendment
to
Prime October
Vendor
Agreement
with
Cardinal dated
Health
Agreement November
--
Inc 11
dated
14
1999
and Richard
between
the to
Company
Smith
between the
1999
Employment Donald
Amendment Company
No
and
Amaral
Agreement dated as
of
pri123
and and and Richard Wendy Joseph and
1999
--
--
--
between the Company EmploymentAgreement Smith dated as of April 26 1999 between the Company Employment Agreement Simpson dated as of April 26 1999 between the Company Employment Agreement Smith dated as of April 26 1999 Form of Indemnification Officers Data Schedule Agreement certain Financial
for Directors
Reports
on
Form
8K
on Form 8-K relating to the report under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy of the Company subsidiary
On August the Company 23 1999 filed of an involuntary filing bankruptcy petition Code Coram Resource against Network Inc
26
http //www.secinfo.comldsvrp.69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 67
SEC
Info
Coram Healthcare Corp Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR 10-Q
For 9/30/99
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
Page 18 of 30Page
51
of 55
http I/www.secinfo
comldsvrp.69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 68
SEC
Info
Coram Healthcare Corp Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR 10-Q
For 9/30/99
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
Next
Page 19 of 30Page
Bottom
Just
52 of 55
1O-Q
28thPage of29
TOCI1st
Previous
28th
SIGNATURES Pursuant Company has of the Securities requirements caused this report to be signed on duly thereunto duly authorized to the Act by of
Exchange its behalf
1934
the
the
undersigned
CORAM HEALTHCARE
CORPORATION SIMESON
By
/5/
WENDY
Wendy Executive Vice Chief November
Simpson President Officer
and
Financial
15
1999
27
http//www.secinfo.com/dsvrp.69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 69
SEC
Info
Coram Healthcare Corp Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR 10-Q
For 9/30/99
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
Next
Page 20 of 30Page
Bottom
Just
53
of 55
1O-Q
Last Page
of
29
TOC
EXHIBIT_INDEX
29th
Download
Table
EXHIBIT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7
27
--
Letter
Amendment
to
Prime October
Vendor
Agreement
with
Cardinal dated
Health
--
Inc 11
dated
14
1999
and Richard
Agreement November Amendment Company
between
the to
Company
Smith
between the
1999
Employment Donald
--
No
and
Amaral
Agreement dated as the
of
--
between Employment Agreement Smith dated as of April 26 Employment
Company Company Company
1999 April 23 and Richard
and and Wendy Joseph and
1999
the the
--
Agreement
dated
as
between
Simpson
--
of
ApJ
26
1999
between Employment Agreement Smith dated as of April 26 Form of Indemnification Officers Data Schedule certain Financial
1999
for Directors
Agreement
http//www.secinfo
.comldsvrp.69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 70
SEC
Info
Coram Healthcare Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR Corp 10-Q
Dates Referenced
For 9/30/99
Document 124-6
and Documents
Filed 04/17/2007
Incorporated
Page 21 of 30Page
Reference
54 of 55
Herein
By
Rferenced-On
This 1O-Qjffln Date
First
Page
Other Filings
Last
9/30/95 8/5/97 4/13/98 5/1/98 5/6/98 6/30/98 7/1/98 8/20/98 9/9/98 9/30/98 12/31/98 1/1/99 3/15/99 4/9/99 4/13/99 4/23/99 4/26/99 5/14/99 6/15/99 6/29/99 6/30/99 7/20/99 8/5/99 8/11/99 8/19/99 8/23/99
14
iQOLA
10-Q
24
IQ
12
fl
24 21 21
11
10-Q
10-K
10-KIA
20
SC 13D/A
27 27
11
29 29
14
12
21
12
26
11 14
PRE 14A DEF 14A
12 27 27
11 14
8-K
For The Period
Ended
9/30/99 10/4/99 10/13/99 10/14/99
27
29
-10/15/99
10/20/99 10/26/99 10/29/99 11/10/99 11/11/99 11/12/99 Filed
25
27
19 11
26
22
16
29
On
Filed
As Of
11/15/99 12/31/99 1/28/0 4/12/0 5/15/0 6/15/0 9/30/0 2/26/1 9/30/1 9/30/2 9/30/3 10
11
22
10-K
19 22 10-Q
23
iQQNT10-Q
10-Q10-Q/ANT1O-Q
10-Q.NT1O-Q
23
23
NT
10-Q 10-Q
http//www.secinfo.com/dsvrp.69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 71
SEC
Info
Coram Healthcare Corp Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR 10-Q Top
For 9/30/99
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
Page 22 of 30Page
55 of 55
List All Filings
Alternative
Formats
Rich Text
Word
.rtf Text txt_EDGAR
Company
gmi XML
Reserved
at
.xmi
et
al
Copyright
2007 Fran Finnegan Sun 15 Apr 2007
All Rights
www.secinfo.com
214904 GMT-
Hp
SEC
Info
http//www.secinfo.com/dsvrp.69Te.htm
4/15/2007
Al 72
Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
Page 23 of 30
PERSONAL
CONFIDENTIAL
16 November 1999
CONFIDENThL
Steve Feinberg
Dear Steve
brief
update
Amaral
and
continue
to
work
on an Employment
Agreement
accepted
base of $650000
asked for
did not accept
bonus
of
up
to
base target
Amaral did not accept
my
formula
and
my EBITDA
rolling
asked for
year contract
Amaral did not accept
my term
advantaged
option
asked for options price Amaral did
with
partial
vest
up front and
slightly
not accept
either
asked for
2.99 did
base
and
targeted either
bonus
in
the event
of
dismissal
not
for
cause
Arnaral
not accept
asked for
to
success
fee of did
1% in
the event the
that
could
engineer
sale/merger
move
CRH
Amaral
not accept
fee
.1
asked for the contract
to
to
continue
to
once myself
had
CRH
all
stabilized
and
that
have
an
option
appoint
CEO
to
replace
Amaral did and
of
not accept
this
Instead
he worded
date that
the contract appoint
cease as
my
contract
the obligations
at
on the
in
someone
in
CEO
but
Ultimately
we
arrived
wording
which
terms
remained
effect
pay would
be cut thereby
reducing
any
into the
incentive
might have
until
under the contract
sell
or effectively
freezing
me
CEOs
job
can
CRH
if
asked for protection golden parachue
Peat upside
under 280
rules
any of the contract
triggered this
an
excess
under IRS
Amaral did
to
not accept
the
am
having
Marwick
review the Agreement
see
if
IRS
limits
obviate
any real
on the deal
CONFIDENTIAL
EXHIBIT
ir
Al 73
Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
Page 24 of 30
CONFIDENTIAL
asked for the
later
DO
and
EO
covera.
this
Amaral refused to provide
this
He
relented
and
said
will receive
tomorrow
asked him did not would
how many
He
later
options said his
it
remain was
in
the option
pooi
He
told
told
me
inc
that that
he he
know
12000
to
He
subsequently
to
return
800000 of
own
options
be used
recruit
new
corporate
management team
Steve want and
it
because of our friendship
to is
and the other deal
we
you
are
in
together have
in
do
clear
what
to
can for
you
now make
need
see the deal the
to
and
writing
me
to
that
cannot
for
kind of return
in
want and
on one or two
to
deals succeed
For
this
work
me
be
several
deals
make them
all
So
lets
come
back
to
CRH
know
your debt
is
in
jeopardy
want
to
help
save it
The
reality
this
at
CRH
is
is
there
to
is
$300M
in debt
and
its
too
much
CRH
may
list
reduce
by $30M
and
$100M
the
on the possible
sale of
CPS the
of
potential
buyers
is
attached note Net
is
number
will
of financial
buyers
be
When
of
its
and
if
debt
CPS
sold
shut
CRH
have
lost
about will
$200M
left to at
approximately
$650M
top line
Infusion
and
Clinical in
service
this
the
Remember
Infusion
has about
$160M
revenue
in the red
time
Now
end
for
illustration in
purposes
to
result
my opinion
payments
of
if CPS sale reduces $250M At that level
the debt of
by
$50M
will
high
debt
CRH
have
to
make
Interest
roughly
is
$25M
will
year
forget
about principal
or restructuring point
is
repayment
The bad news
little
that in
leave of
zip for cap-ex
so the
CRH
has
very
still
going for
it
terms
improving
rfIe
that
debt will
be too high for
CRH
am
time
at
Suppose
that
in the next
to
year somehow
to at to
able
to
to
improve
EBITDA
task
to
on
the
$450M
there large
top line
roughly $30M
situation
is
$40M
this
7%
9%
its
No
fair
small for
given
expect
is
how reduced
will
arid
CRHs
not
think
you
the
be
significant
to
charge
be taken
soft
CRH
Certainly
AR
too
too old
expect
its
So what
Well
heres how
it
looks
to
me from here
Even with
the sale of
CPS
do
and
the potential for service
EBITDA
the
interest to
improvement on the debt
that to
CRH
13 With
turn
will
be able
to
little
more than
its
an
EBITDA
and
improvement
sell this
still
quite hard
to
imagine enough
we can make
this like
around
out
debt-ridden
firm
anyone
for
work
well for anyone
think abOut
whos
out there
to
buy something
CUNFJDENIIA
Al 74
Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
Page 25 of 30
COMFLDENTL
this
and
what
their
realistic
appetite
would
be for CR1-I and
its
large
debt
and
Theres
equity
no way
value
is
there
can be
any
real
equity shares
value
on the stock
Todays
roughly
$4QM 50M
owns
.75 cents
$37.5M
public in equity
Obviously
value
is
the debt
aheady
this
company and
incentive options
to
the present
mirage
right
rate
if
M.kes having
options
pointless value
my
to
opinion
materially
At any
one could expect
they ever
have
little
be
diluted
get in the
money month fore
Amaral told bearance on
me
that the debt
holders
are
now
offering
six
the interest
principal
and
covenants
My
reaction
to
is that
this
is
too short think
of
what
will
will
be needed
probably
by CR11 need
cash
It
really
needs
be more like be able can
to
year
service
CRH
in
$20M
holiday
versus
if
it
debt
2000
To
tell
the truth
six
$1OM to think CRH will
payment have
be lucky
show much improvement Then
guy
will
before
the
months
to
wears off
trashed
is
be
left to
be
disappointment CR1-I with
you
my
where
name name am
as the
who couldnt
turn
or
in
time
At
or
worse -my
point
on
BK
busting
and people associate
me
the failure
that
after
my me
for
to
butt
for
CR11
H-rn-rn-in
Now
if
you
were
what
would
you
do
some
Knowing
has
CRH
will
be
60-75
hour So and
week trench-war
theres
all
me
Obviously
that
CR11
been
horribly
mismanaged
in
no reason
to
think
theres
silver
lining waiting
the
wings
need
do
is
show up
do what
consider
absohnely want
to
can for you because you have you
friend
been
better
generous
with
me
this
past
year
that
and you deserve
delivered signed
outcome
in
In
fairness investment
hope
that
you feel that
clearly failed
have up
for you at WIL on
to
an have
to
had
until
help But
measure
the risk
reward
Wouldnt
you
should
am
seriously
asking
myself why
to
do this The upside
to
just
isnt there
The Board
isnt willing
pay
for
what
needs
be
done
Honestly
do
the
not see
how we can dayihe
Based
reasonably
expect
is
WIL
to
cover
the shortfall
What
going
if at to
end
of
the
value
write
me
check
on
W/L what
at
insufficient
Are you just
What
if
no matter
or its
how
clever Will for
am
you
to
or
how many hours
pay
work
would
CRH
that
just
cant
be improved
enough
realistic
still
me
and what
amount
be
dont
think
me
expect
anything
At the same
time
dont
CONFUENTtI\L
Al 75
Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
Page 26 of 30
COFIDENTIL
think
CRH
been
will for
be able to pay
me
either
In
that
case
all
of
my work
would
have
nothing
This
is
understandably been
called
very
sad situation earlier
but its
not
my
fault
should have
much
What
should happen working
for
now
all
is that
should
to
hired assess
as Crisis Manager
for
six
months
CR1-I
the creditors
CRH
Then
and determine
could
whether
the
can be
salvaged
or
is
must be liquidated
that
implement
plan
My
initial
inclination
CRH
may
.need of
to
be put into court
BK
and be
thoughtfully
restructured
under protection
am
table
open
to talking
about
is
this
but the reality
is
think
we
should
all
go back
to
to at this
ground
zero
What
your/Goldman/Foothills
goal
We
need
be
together
Weve
Amaral
screwed
around
with about
this this
lot
Ive been
much
tortured
to
by Smith and
foi-
Ive worried
endlessly
because
want
be there
you
am recommending Independent
people
the think
all
of
us including meet
in
the creditors
and
CRHs
what do
it
it is
Directors be done
the upside
New York am
and
determine
to
that if
can
is
Whether
that
the right effort
person
And
am
guy
what
covers
this
Sincerely
Al 76
Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
Page 27 of 30
4.
Dynamic
Health care
Soutions
November
19
1999
Mr
Mark
Neporent
Capital
Cerberus
Management
450 Park Avenue
28
Floor
New York NY
Dear
10022
Mr
Neporent
Enclosed executed
file
is
the revised
Employment
Please
Agreement
return
fully
with
two
original
signature page
for
pages our
by Dan Crowley
executed
signature
rely
Pamel9idley
Assisth
to
HelTera
Daniel
Crowley
Enclosure
PLAIN1-IFrs
4OOCapoLMaII
Suite
1250.SacramentoCA
95814
916.449.6056-91449.6059
fax
CRtB
01350
EXHIBIT
Al 77
Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
Page 28 of 30
FAI.Z1275A
5305
DLkCK
ACRE
L__
1899
sHULE
ROTH
LABELL
11111111
l619/T
1617/NO
4260753807
ZMtOYMZriT
liii
Ei1oyiucnt
Conu Ci
Moni
AtcluciI
this
qflet
inde
of Augugt thc
1q99
by
iad
Lv.
Dc1wre
llmk.d putneeodp
RUnpk
RECrrAL
Tho Eipkyei oarb
iIrrc
the
Zutive
ov.i
the tqtmj
nymcol
with dituit
tho
Boiptoyex ic foil
iii
the
ivii
wiih
to
czI
ep1oymL
md
ULi
Aoiiejt
AILMNT
Th
wlibCJ
BsnloyeT such
rfI
dwi EivcZvWe upIoym ipon
the IQ
the
tn
OipIO1Uet
and
th
coidtloni
izipoyr
end
lb
Eorthv
tMh
The Pgxtci
IfltelldII%
bo ka1ly
boini
ujo
Llflowe
efln1Uflts
For
thc
otthI
Aroncnc th
toUuwJnj
tt
ae
have
the
mwni acv
tisoe to
or
AroUl
Zia1i
rw
uiuithh
I.T1ilOyIfleJ1t
Apcoit
rw
aoicc4rd
nIu
dine
mcme
esy rndty
award
coo11nI
F.inb.
tha4
or
iceounti
iqciI
sthciJy
lkully
1J3
lbs
8p1cyu
tSkD
$2J n4
U.cfit
Unir
Ii
dcned
.Siii 7.1b
__________
dons4
Sccton
H.
bsU
tad
tlliuiie
tCit1ni mw
iit scels
Affiflglos
cong
ISO
efi1io
so4
ita
wpaics podbI iflcshneis dots fnmulaai .uiae piecc dus ccbo pbaeotpb reesdt iW ianip n1nei .id Ww tee plema4
baudLng PibIIn
CWTSCL airrnd
knuw.bor
rowin
Ontbn2cT
4pIom mnif%uzing
ord
iitcipsts4
or
UThU
md
Ui
evitomo
tcquLciuci
pilor
ml
s4oceaaci
liThe
buow
CERB
01351
Al 78
Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
Page 29 of 30
1./L89
lt04
11530
ZABE
LLP
BI.ACX
ACRE
CAPITAL
0O7 02
1619/ST 1617/O.26O7B3B07
UfHUI1
1899
jROLSCHULTER0TH
ncnpu11c io1tweu fotanula
oftniue and diibise
pro1w
u1olnVns
OflR
including
aylteuia
oect
r.Me and
aawoe
vodc
comptc and
ndatrd
ttnctni
mid adiJtcctui ItnOw-bow
Con3
ia ona.pu
ho
JUCCe
Lr.nj1
lmprocrniLi
nicthodi that
kic
rec
invtolio
dIoy
id.i
and ride
inmnaion
within tha
lnfoimdnn
Jonicnicd
f.dczil
meifoj
EuipIuy
nl.abie Ii
tas
and
coiuw.rn
law he
aud
iilrtion
c.cctning
buytneu wtnela
and
aflani
nfthe
AIan
t1iXcmci3
apeu..I1n
inciwling
fliuiiiP
mtIia
projwtoni pImim
Cuiupanri
jplinI
hstzlcai
ilium
md hedai
hittonccl
ndpvjcted
cmpia4
pcraiiiiirI
budgaft and
md
the
nnm
and
bmdgouuUa
trwning
tedatiuquw
and uiikriab
ttowqvor
urkmyponct doimcntM and
mrnixiej
miti
prepirid contminrng
nialyrim
rnpiPafluna
or
ite
aluthva
and oUiormtesiU
by or
fur tho
TIuyer
In
AtiM
any
oclwliiig Porifoll thanieiion
iucludad
Coan.mns
in the
limned
wboic
or in
ia$
fumo1ng
the otttim
T11ZA
pniruLu
oIth
EmiIoy
fix
EUthc
avri
as
C1iisfE.octlvo
CouTpy wluth OIlk dutu th
ii Iu
di1ithf
dfln
ii
ion
cctiin
62 8.2U
AgrIIflrUL
1Diyi
den
mrs
La
Uate
dais
of dii
pInyIua mni
enit
cnaak
any
idemi
htyantion
ncthnqu
dmctj
whdherpmteniablI
or
not
my induaisl
oi If
wboruwh
or
dija
pisa
san
ai
woi
JiuWiVft
æZd tJi44
wbIthuMab1a
hr ar
In ObtIiOId foy with aonjunctinn
Au
54i.thw by
or
niconducorwnuetut
I1O cop
out
sod
otk
th
In
uJaulhntmhlp
or
yihi
prcecdoo
lololy
crcaIczI
coinsIud
dra.Ioped
th
xorntiye
11151
cftba
oibere
thai
durtng relIiui to
Rmploynani
PIIIOI
or
pacd
any
or
iOUdH
in
flu
ptian
at II
EuipIoymea
tdod.
mws
my wsy
by
thC
Iajoj
due bsng
flub
induitiiJ
prcpcicd any
be onalwctrdby
the
Elnpoy
AIliuIslu sololy dac
inoludin
in
Pod
CnaT7nies.I
fullowing
ad
.o4 urn qcind
nfihc
Ihat
flxaeriw
wither with
anjuci4on
nrira
4th.othuic
wenubulion
uiIvue
ii
ioycnI
spots or
poyor
Aflhlimiw
Inminding
Pnttu Cxnpanlei
umI
uwa
UnntkhLImJ
In1brusoti
iltl4J.2iod
ccia
tbo
of
the
xecutm
.nploylnu$
widci
this
dte
wpIoy.a1
fliLi
mm
it
wdt
ott the
Effective
flat
or
cltwiscalfroo.iimProdmo
.2
CERB
01352
Al 79
Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR
Document 124-6
Filed 04/17/2007
Page 30 of 30
1804
FAI
212
758
5305
BK
ACREL1TM
IL
10
OQa.oz 1617/HO
42607R3807
ROMSCHUL
ROTH
ZJBELLP
TH1II
991619/ST
iiwdjncxUnn6.3
ii
tkncd
Sio
6.4
rijs Iig Cuwi
hhird
in S.eiIou
Inc.
the
gictt1
piiin
of tb.Ecnp.oyat
ij
cutpurTIOfl liability
ma my
itO1
at 1iuIUiJ or
indhidaaZ
LI1IIUb
incLw1in oump.ny
wo-ptuBi 6t318
oorp-r1zot1
feitWadllp
jumi YETtIA1
mLt ioaagioo
Vaveiwcn1
bcty rpcrJioi
miy
orite
toy
or
pmnLleraldp
joint
tttmc diM
ur
mnflr
entity
EranjunL
end ai
Fe
wbi
whine
the
2atployi
Ii
or
Athliulc
bee nude
en rniploy.r
or equrty ooijenjmemt
hivev1mu
thereto at
eijIivC
rmdain
Urtnu
thiero
eoriaplayc
ds2nadin
bCctlca
tIip1od
1WLIlSflV
ii
dcn
vu1lot
hi
or1io
72ijy
sa4
4cdm4
in
3.1i
krseaiT.renaendfln1ke LI
Jim
lm$oyiiuet
Fioy hmrhy
by hi
vznplnya
cuipWy1n1
pInyet
thc Exunth ajl the Ezecutty uoi di Ima end wditioj ci Ibith
hby
hi
aceqiLi
iie
Subjw Agi1flZ
will
the
ruv.ni
eIcctiue1 piavidc4 clthc
initial
the thet such
of
the
EieculiV
mn1oymnent
uMit
thu
the.
y
mmlca
iui
mmdi be iuwnetleefly 006C1
te the utiti peety
eiendad wtthin deem
hr
ebity
0i4 yspido.ibi
F4tt1
PTQ8td
WTtUCli
da
to sxtanj
hc.ri
the
.xpirt aZthi
lvn
or aay invwsl
thsauch
not
wils
in
nrlhi
Awnnent
21
The Ormio1
rtgntion
DUIJW Exvcuth
wfll
wvs
autia
iiee
The
ii
as amanci
wib
or d.lcsu.ii
to
cu1iycIy
bu.dreas
miw
Pastnort
dull
Stopbni e1tufrely
tipS en to
Ezacuthc
dcvuuc
flinptoyet
ii eniki
tev
thai
List
Liwhnsims
tha
udm
Is
cmy tartlcho
Coieiiy
Compeni.
premnoti
wNab
Umilave
asmoc4 or
in
by
the
mpiqy- will
of such of
dir
two
lila
h4
rffoiia
noreen
ethc FJT4CrUI
wi1t
en
lisle
iniiit.M
melncu
Yuitfb$o
h.jt
Cotvmy
Inlenieta
and
nOt
u.uopt
litUy
the
him.vl
PIITTI
he
awlI
anat
pewent
the
of
th
Bmiploy.r
Nadikig
Secdoa
2.3
hnwewr
EvnFrccm
CERB
0135
Al 80