Free Appendix - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 2,379.3 kB
Pages: 30
Date: April 16, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 9,345 Words, 65,537 Characters
Page Size: 612 x 805 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8917/124-3.pdf

Download Appendix - District Court of Delaware ( 2,379.3 kB)


Preview Appendix - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR

Document 124-3

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 1 of 30

CORAM HEALTHCARE CORPORATION
NOTES
FINANCIAL
June

TO UNAUIMTED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS Continued
in

30 1999

the

Company
its

was

compliance

with

all

of these and

covenants

other than

covenants

relating

to

certain

relationships

Coram
certain

Resource
parties

Network
that

Inc

Coram
to

Independent
services

Practice pursuant Healthcarc
certain

Association
to the

Inc

subsidiaries

have

with

were

contracted

provide with

Master

Agreement

effective

May
and
to

1998

USHC
Company
assurance waivers

the

Master Agreement
relating
its

Aetna

U.S
of

Inc

Aetna
The
be

or

Aetna
however
whether
to

certain

covenants

to

the

capitalization

subsidiaries

has
as

received
further at

waivers covenant

from

lenders
will to

regarding
in

such

noncompliance
periods and

There any

can

no

violations

occur
the

future

whether

necessaiy

will

be

forthcoming

that

time See Note

Companys

Unaudited

Condensed

Consolidated

Financial

Statements

Series

Notes

The

Series quarterly

Notes
in arrears to

mature
in

in

May

2001

and

bore

interest

at

an

initial

rate

of
at

9.875% pur annum
the
election to

payable

cash

or through

the issuance the

of

additional

Series

Notes
interest interest

of

the

Company
Notes exceeds

Pursuant
to

the

Note

Amendment
Holders ratio $4.5
lieu

parties

increased

the
to

rate in

applicable cash
if

the Series

11.5%

per

annum The
coverage

can

require

the

Company
ended

pay

the

Company
on

certain

interest

During the quarter

June

30 1999
Series such

interest

expense
totaling

the Series

Notes $4.5

was approximately
issued
in

million cash

On

July

15

1999
interest

additional

Notes
date

approximately

million were

of

payment of

due

through

Series

Notes

The

Series in

Notes mature
or

in

April 2008

and

bear

interest

at

the

rate at

of the

8%

per

annum
of the
are

payable

quarterly

in arrears to

cash

through

the issuance the

of additional

Series

Notes
of

election

Company
convertible anti-dilution obligations

Pursuant
into

the
of

Note

Amendment
adjustments
at

outstanding
at price

principal

amount

Series subject pursuant
to

Notes

shares

the

Companys Common
for

Stock
sale

of $2.00 stock

per share other than
at

customary
to existing

adjustments or

including
benefit

of

common

employee
in lieu

plans

price

below

the conversion
of

price

prevailing

the time of such the quarter

sale

Cash
June

will

be paid

of

fractional

shares

upon

conversion

the Series

Notes
$1.8 of

During million cash

ended 1999

30

1999

interest

expense
totaling

on

the Series

Notes
$1.8

was approximately
issued

On

July

15

additional

Series such

Notes
date

approximately

million were

in lieu

payment of

interest

due

through

The
in if

Series

and

Series

Notes of hold

are

redeemable
of the

in

whole

or

in

part
in

at

the option

of

the

Holders

thereof

connection the

with

any change ceases
to

control

Company
certain

as
by

defined
in

the

Securities

Exchange
subsidiaries

Agreement
or

Company
of the

and

control of
its

interests

its

significant

upon

the and

acquisition

Company
also

or

certain at

subsidiaries

third

party

In

such

instances

the

Series interest

Series Series
at at

Notes Notes

are are

redeemable

103%
at

of the then

outstanding

principal

amount upon

plus accrUed of the

The Notes

redeemable

the option

of the Holders

thereof

maturity

Series are

the outstanding any time
at

principal

amount thereof plus accrued
the then outstanding
principal

interest In addition

the Series
interest at

Notes
the

callable

103%

of

amount

plus

accrued

option

of

the

Company
Exchange
satisfaction

New
certain

Senior

Credit

Facility
to closing

The

consummation
Securities

of the

Exchange

was

contingent on June

upon

the All

of were

conditions with

prior

of the

Exchange

Agreement Company Company Agreement Exchange
to

30 1998
an
into

conditions
for

satisfied credit

the exception

of the condition on
to

requiring the

execute

agreement the
First

new

senior

facility

Accordingly

June

30 1998
the

the

entered and the

Amendment
consummated Company
under $60.0 the
to

and

Waiver

the

Amendment
for

the

Securities

Exchange
Securities

Exchange
requiring In

was
the

The Amendment waived
execute an agreement the Holders secured
or prior

the condition

under
credit

Agreement

new

senior

facility

on

or

prior

to to

June

30 1998
the the

addition up
to

Amendment
of senior on

of the Series

and Series
Senior Credit

Notes agreed Facility

extend
to

million

debt
to

the

New

Company
completion entered

subject the

of

definitive

agreements

September

30 1998

On August

20 1998

Company

into

CROWLEYKVN

016908

A61

Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR

Document 124-3

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 2 of 30

CORAM HEALTHCARE
NOTES
FINANCIAL

CORPORATION

TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS Continued
Senior capital
calculations

definitive facility subject Facility for to

agreement

for

the

New
base

Credit
letters as

Facility of credit in

providing and other

for

the

availability

of the

$60.0

million
is

acquisitions
certain

working

corporate

purposes

The

availability

borrowing February

defined

the underlying of prime June
as well

agreement

The

New

Senior on

Credit the
first

matures

business secured
assets

day of each by the
capital

26 2001 and bears an interest month The interest rate was 9.25%
stock of the

rate at

plus

1.5% payable The

in arrears

30 1999
as

New

Senior Credit and

Facility

is

Companys

subsidiaries

the accounts Credit

receivable

certain

other

held by

fees the on the

the Company and Company was required
facility

its

subsidiaries pay an upfront per

Under
fee

the

New
in

Senior

Facility
is

to

of 1.0%
quarterly

or $0.6

million

and

liable

among other nominal for commitment fees ended
In

unused

of

of
fees

1.0% on the

annum

due

anears During

the quarter $0.8

June

30

1999
the

interest

and

related

New

Senior Credit provide
at for

Facility

were

approximately of warrants
to to

million

addition
million

terms of the of

New
1998
to

Senior

Credit

Facility

the issuance

purchase

up

to

1.9

shares

common
The
costs to

stock

of the

Company
were over

$0.01
at
life

per share
fair

subject
at

customary of issuance Facility
to

adjustments and were

the

1998
for

Warrants
as

Warrants

valued the

their of

value

the date

accounted

deferred
million

be

amortized expense

the

New

Senior

Credit

The
the

Company
1998

charged

$0.4 terms

interest

during
Facility

the quarter
also
fall

ended
for

June 30 1999
the issuance of

related

Warrants

The

of the that

New

Senior Credit
credit

provide below

letters

of

credit

of

provided
credit

available

would not
$17.1

zero

As of June 30 1999
the

the Holders
availability also
first

up to $25.0 million had issued letters of
the

totaling Facility

approximately

million

thereby of the

reducing

Companys
Facility

under
for

New

Senior per

Credit

by

that

amount The
letter

terms
credit

New

Senior Credit due
in arrears

provide business

fee of 1.0% of each
to

annum

on

the outstanding

of

obligations
also

on

the
fees

day

month
letter

The terms of the
of
credit issuer

New

Senior Credit
to

Facility

provide
related

for

additional

to

be paid on

demand
letters

any

pursuant

the

application fees

and were

documentation on the

under

which

such

of

credit

are

issued

As of June 30 1999 The

such

0.825% per annum
contains
certain

amount of outstanding
covenants and

letter

of

credit

obligations

New

Senior Credit

Facility in

other customary
all

events

of default

At June
relating

30 1999
to

the

Company

was

compliance

with

of these

covenants and

other

than

the covenants

earnings

before

interest ratio

expense
and

income
debt
iatio

taxes

depreciation
as

amortization 1999

EBITDA
certain

covenant matters can be

interest

coverage

covenant

covenant
its

of June

30
in

and

for

other

The no

Company
as will

has however
to

received further
at that

waivers covenant

from

lenders regarding
will

such future

noncompliance
periods and

There
whether

assurance waivers

whether

violations

occur

necessary

be

forthcoming the been with
letters

time had an
available to

At August which
delivered

16

1999 had

New
the of

Senior Credit including

Facility

borrowing the
letters

base of

of

$583
that

million of

$37.0
in

million

drawn

$14.5

million

relating

credit

had

been

accordance the other
as

Master Agreement
credit obligations

with

Aetna
$2.5

In

addition
total

after

deducting

from the
the
facility

borrowing
is

base

totaling

million the

available-under

$19.2

million

of

August

16

1999

Contingencies

Litigation Healthcare
filed in

On

November James
District to

21 1995
Sweeney
Court
receive filed for

suit

captioned

William

Hall

and

Barbara

Lisser

Coram was
class

Corporation States

Patrick

Fortune and Sam
District to

Leno No
on of

95-CV-2994WIiB
of
re

the United

the Northern

of Georgia the

behalf In

purported

of

plaintiffs

who

were

entitled

warrants an

pursuant

settlement on caused

T2 Medical 28 1996
on
in

Inc which and

Shareholder they
allege

Litigation
that

Plaintiffs

Amended
and

Class Action

Complaint
that

February fraud

the Defendants the price
alleges

made
of the

false

misleading stock

statements

the market through

artificially

inflated

Companys
of

during

the period of the

from August Act of
alleges

1994

August
lOb-5

1995

Such

Complaint
thereunder

violations
all

Section

10b
of the

Securities also

1934

and

Rule

promulgated
against

against

of the

Defendants

The Complaint
Securities

controlling

person further

liability alleges

the individual defendants

under

Section

20a

and

Exchange

Act

and

CROWLEYKVN

016909

A62

Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR

Document 124-3

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 3 of 30

CORAM HEALTHCARE
NOTES
FINANCIAL
fraud
faith

CORPORATION

TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS Continued
under Georgia

by and

all

of the Defendants dealing by
all

law Finally
seek the

Plaintiffs

allege

breach

of the covenant
the

of good
in

fair

Defendants
as

Plaintiffs to

compensatory settlement stock
at

damages
In
re

reflecting

difference

value

between with
at

the warrants the trading

issued pursuant of the

of
its

12

Medical
and the

Inc

Shareholder

Litigation

price

Companys common Companys
on stock Class Action

actual
its

price

same number of The Defendants

warrants
filed

the

same exercise
to

price

with the

trading on

at

alleged

true

value

Molin

dismiss
to

the

Amended

Complaint

March The

13

1996

The

Court

granted

the
to

Companys Motion
the Eleventh
petition Circuit the

Dismiss

the Complaint which

February the

12

1997
on

Plaintiffs

appealed

the dismissal
Plaintiffs filed

Court

of Appeals

affirmed on the

dismissal

October
writ

15
of an

1998

The

with
to

United

States

Supreme 19
the

Court

March Supreme

15

1999 Court

for

certiorari

and

the the

Company
Plaintiffs

responded
petition .for

the petition

On May
ending

1999

entered

rder

denying

certiorari

thereby the the

matter
Service year

In

January
tax rcturn to that

1999
of

Internal

Revenue
for

IRS
ended The

completed

the examination

of

the

federal

incomc

Company
tax

the
of

September

30

1995
has

and agreed

proposed
to

substantial

adjustments $24.4
the million

the

prior

liabilities

the
loss

Company

Company
available
write-off affect

adjustments not agree the

of with

only

affect

the net operating regarding

carryforwards

The Company
of goodwill
prior

does and

other

proposed

adjustments 1995

the deduction

of warrants

specified

liability

portion

of the the

loss

which

would

if

the

IRS
notice

prevails of $12.7

the

years

tax to

liability

On

May

14

1999 The The
and
will

Company
is

received
totaled

statutory

deficiency

with

respect and

the
penalties

proposed
to

adjustments determined
litigation to

alleged

deficiency

approximately of most

million plus through

interest

be and

Company
vigorously

contesting
its

the notice

deficiency significant

administrative proposed

proceedings by the
losses

defend
to

position

The

adjustment
as

IRS
and

relates offset

the

ability

of the

Company
for

categorize the

certain

net operating

losses

specified in

liability

income
$12.7
for this

in prior

years
to

which

Company
of
final

has previously resolution be given the
that

received

refunds

the

amount

of approximately include the
early

million

Due

the uncertainly

Companys
the with

financial

statements
prevail

reserve phase of

these

potential

liabilities

No

assurance

can
in

matter
prevail

and

the uncertainties.inherent respect be
to

any proceeding

Company will the IRS or in
the
financial

given
If

litigation position

the

Company
of

does the the

not

with could

the proposed

material

adjustments

and

liquidity

Company

materially adversely affected

See Part II Item
Financial Statements Price

Legal

Proceedings

and

Note

to

Companys On

Unaudited

Condensed
the
in

Consolidated

July

1997

Company
the the

filed

suit

against

Waterhouse
California
filed

LLP

now

known
in

as

Priceof

waterhouseCOopers $165.0 million

LLP
part

Supreme
settlement

Court
that

of

San Francisco
case

seeking

damages
against

excess

As

of

resolved

by

the

Company
and

Caremark
to

International
-_

Inc
of

and Caremark

Inc

collectively

Caremark
against

Caremark

assigned

transferred

the

Company
This
lawsuit

all

Caremarksclaims
of claims includes

and causes of action
claims
for

Price

Waterhouse Caremark

LLP
in

Caremarks
and

auditors
settling
its

assignment with the

damages

sustained by the
court in

defending

Company
right to

The
re-file

case
in

was dismissed from
Illinois

California because the lawsuit
in in

of inconvenience court court
in

to

witnesses

with

The
to

Company
the

re-filed

state state

Illinois

PricewaterhouseCoopers
several filed set

LLP
their to

filed

motion

dismiss

Companys
1999
In an

lawsuit

the

in Illinois

on

grounds
another

but

motion

was denied
the

on

March

15

May

1999

PricewaterhouseCoopers

LLP
is

motion

dismiss and

Company

has submitted
into

opposition stage

The There

hearing can be

on no

the motion assurance

for

October

29 1999

The

lawsuit

has progressed

the discovery

of

any

recovery

from PricewaterhouseCoopers

LLP
complaint

On
States

June

30 1999
Court
forth

the
for

Company

filed

the

Coram Complaint
Civil Action

against

Aetna

in

the United

District sets to

the Eastern
against

District

of Pennsylvania
for

No

99-CV-3330 The Coram
of contract and
rescission

Complaint
relating

claims

Aetna
between

fraud
parties

misrepresentation
for ancillary

breach

the

Master Agreement Network

the

network
its

management
of termination

services of-

through

Corams

Resource

Division

R-Net

Coram

provided

notice

the

Master

10

CROWI..EYKVN

016910

A63

Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR

Document 124-3

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 4 of 30

CORAM
NOTES

I-IEALTHCARE

CORPORATION

FINANCIAL 30 1999 home health Coram
Under
care began

TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS Continued
the

Agreement managed
monthly mately

effective

June

arrangement
for

that

was expected
enrollees

to

last for in

five

years
for

Coram
stated approxi.

and provided
fee

services

over

2000000 Aetna
enrollees

eight

states

per

enrollee

serving

Aetna

under

the

Master Agreement

on

July
stated

1998
in the

As

Coram

Complaint

Aetna

wrongfully other things

induced

Coram

to

enter

into

and

continue
utilization at

performing
of

under

the care
of

Master Agreement
services which

by among
As
also
its

misrepresenting higher

and

understating

home

health

utilization

has been
stated failure

substantially in to

than

Aetna

represented

the the

commencement
Master
totaling additional

the

Master Agreement
respects million

the pay

Coram

Complaint

Aetna has breached
the

Agreement
in

in several

including

amounts due under

Master Agreement

excess

of
for

$10.0 the

Furthermore
necessary and

Aetnas
to

piisrepresentations
its

induced the

Coram

to

expend In the

amounts Coram
June
is

infrastructure

perform

duties

under of

Master Agreement
million

lawsuit

seeking the

compensatory

punitive

damages
of

in

excess

50.0

On
filed

30 1999
on June

Company
1999
in

received of

copy

complaint Pleas and of

the Aetna Complaint Montgomery
relief

that

had

been

by

Aetna

29
Aetna

the Court

Common
equitable

County
to

Pennsylvania the

Case
to have

No

99-11025
under and

The
the

Complaint including
services right to

seeks the
to

declaratory
to

compel

Company
that

perform rendered

Agreement
to

payment

of compensation plan

the healthcare
stated in

providers

continue the

render

Aetnas

health the

members As On
motion
its

the

Aetna

Complaint

Aetna

disputes

Companys
to state

terminate court

Agreement
filed

approximately
to

July
to

1999
have

Coram
the case

removed the Aetna Complaint
transferred

federal

Then Aetna

remand seeking motion
District

back
is

to

court
in

Aetna

subsequently States
District

withdrew Court
for

remand

such

thai

the

Aetna
Civil

Complaint Action

also

pending

the United

the Eastern

of Pennsylvania

No

99-CV-3378 20 1999
Action

On
Coram
tation
its

July Civil

Aetna

filed

counterclaim

against to

Coram

in

the

federal

court
for

lawsuit fraud
to

brought misrepresen

by

No

99-CV-3330

and

motion

dismiss the claims has
filed

of

Coram
to

and

rescission

of the

Master Agreement
sued

Coram
among
never

an

opposition breach perform of the

the motion

dismiss. In and

counterclaim

Aetna

has

Coram

for

other

things
to for

the

Master Agreement

fraudulent tion

misrepresentation with other
in

contending

Coram
with

intended and

Master Agreement
with prospective seeks

defama
of

interference

contractual

relations that

providers bid
for

interference

contractual
in

relations

with
million

companies

allegedly

the

Master Agreement

Aetna

excess

$100.0

the lawsuit an agreed

plus punitive

damages
July

Pursuant fashion the

to

upon order dated
of

23 1999

Coram
the

is

transitioning

back

to

Aetna
has

in

an orderly
--

management
to

home

health care providers
for

services

under

Master Agreement

Coram
services as part

learned that
after

Aetna
July and

has agreed 1999

pay

network
its

properly

authorized
for

home

health

care

rendered of
its

23

while

reserving

rights

to

pursue

Coram

the

cost
is

of such

services to

complaint

counterclaim of
its

against

Coram The Companys R-Net
network
for services

division

continuing

process

claims

submitted

by

members

provider

rendered

through

June

30 1999
and
to

The Company
against
all

intends claims

to

pursue

its

claims

against

Aetna

vigorously and the

put

forth

vigorous

defense
to

of

the

brought

by

Aetna

against

Coram

other

Coram

parties
in

Due

the

uncertainties

inherent cannot

in litigation

the ultimate

disposition

of the has

Aetna
been

litigation

described
in

the preceding

paragraphs dated

presently

be
for

determined any recovery
in

and
or

no
loss

provision
that

recorded

the

Companys Consoli
Aetna on the
litigation financial

Financial

Statements

may
could

result

upon

resolution

of the
effect

described position

above
results

An

adverse

outcome and

such

litigation

have

material

adverse

of operations
also that

liquidity

of the

Company
legal actions arising actions

The Company Management
believes

is

party

to

various other
resolution

out of the normal
will

course material

of

its

business
effect

the ultimate

of such

other

not have

adverse

11

cROWLEY0169hl

A64

Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR

Document 124-3

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 5 of 30

COItAM

HEALTHCARE

CORPORATION

NOTES

FINANCIAL

TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS Continued
of operations
or liquidity of

on

the

financial

position

results

the

Company
cannot be

Nevertheless presently be

due

to

the

uncertainties

inherent

in litigation

the ultimate

disposition

of these the

actions

determined
for

Contingencies
certain

The

Master Agreement
services

provides
to

that

Company would
in certain certain

financially

responsible based plans

covered

home

health

rendered
that to

covered

enrollees

Aetna

HMO
are

The

Master Agreement
for services

also

contemplates by

the

Company
of
certain

under such

circumstances

would reimburse Aetna
referred to in

paid

for as

directly

Aetna

providers

services

These

amounts
capitation

the

Master Agreement Company
as

leakage
for

Aetna withheld

amounts from each
claims

reserve $5.3

the reimbursement

of leakage
for

During the term
of leakage with

payment made to the of the Master Agreement

approximately

million

was withheld
required
to

by Aetna
to

payment

The Master
for

Agreement Aetna
to failed

Aetna

provide the

Company

monthly

reports

showing
that

its

claims did

leakage

but

do

so The most recent of approximately
$19.7
million to in

three leakage incurred review

reports

Aetna

provide

purported

show

approximately

leakage

claims

through of the

approximately
initial

March
revealed

1999
that

with the

potentially reports

more leakage
inaccurate
in

claims various

follow

The The

Companys Company
of

reports to

were

respects

reported

these

inaccuracies
it

Aetna

but

received
for
if

no

response

At

this

time the Company Aetna due
to

cannot

determine

whether

will

be held
estimate
are

responsible

the leakage

claims asserted by claims
are

the uncertainties
responsibility

litigation

and cannot These

how

much
the

any

of the leakage
ut

properly described

the

of the

Cothpany

matters

among

issues

dispute

in

the

litigation

above

Income Taxes
During $0.8 June
million

the and

six

months ended
million
differ

June

30

1999

and

1998

the

Company
tax rates

recorded
for federal

an
six

income month
state

tax

expense

of

$0.1

respectively
substantially rates as

The
from

effective the

income

the

30

1999

and

1998

expected of the

combined

and
full

periods ended income tax rates
reserve

calculated using applicable
its

statutory

result

Company

providing

valuation

against

deferred

tax

assets

As of June
deferred Deferred charge
that that are are

30 1999
is

deferred

tax

assets

are

net of of the

$134.7

million valuation
to in

allowance

Realization
in

of

tax

assets

dependent primarily
to

upon

the

ability

Company
consisting
for

generate part

taxable

income

the future costs the

taxes
for

relate

temporary

differences

of accrued and

restructuring

goodwill

and

other
for

long-lived tax

assets allowances purposes
until

doubtful

accounts

other

accrued
loss

liabilities

not deductible deductible

income
future
-internal

paid

or realized

and

to

net operating

carryforwards

against

taxable

income
Service year

In

January tax

1999
of

the the

Revenue
for

IRS
The

completed

the

examination and agreed

of

the federal
substantial

income

return
to

Company
tax

the of

ended

September

30

1995
has

proposed
to

adjustments $24.4
million

the

prior

liabilities

the
loss

Company

Company
available

adjustments not agree the

of with

that only

affect

the net operating regarding which received
totaled the

carryforwards

The Company does
of goodwill
prior

the other
liability

proposed

adjustments 1995
loss

the deduction
if

of warrants prevails of

write-off affect

and
tax to

specified

portion

of the the

would

the

IRS

the

years respect

liabilities

On
be

May

14

1999 The The
and

Company

statutory

notice

deficiency

with

the
penalties

proposed
to

adjustments determined
litigation to

alleged

deficiency
is

approximately notice of

$12.7

million plus through

interest

and

Company
vigorously

contesting
its

deficiency
significant

administrative proposed

proceedings

and
relates offset

will

defend
to

position

The most

adjustment
as specified in

by the IRS
losses

the

ability

of the

Company
for

categorize

certain

net operating

losses

liability

and

income
$12.7
for this

in prior

years

which the Company has previously received
of
final

refunds

the

amount of approximately
include the the
early

million

Due

to

the uncertainty

resolution be given

the
that

Companys
the with the

financial

statements given
If

reserve phase of

these

potential

liabilities uncertainties

No

assurance inherent

can
in

Company
IRS

will prevail

matter

and

the

any proceeding

or

in litigation

Company

does

12

CROWLEYKVN

016912

A65

Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR

Document 124-3

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 6 of 30

CORAM HEALTHCARE
NOTES

CORPORATION

TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FNANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
the proposed material affected adjustments the
financial position

not

prevail

with could

respect be

to

and

liquidity

of

the

Company

materially adversely

Industry

Segment

and

Geographic evaluates basis

Area

Operations performance of the
are

Management
product
is

regularly

the operating

Company by
Infusion
alternate

reviewing and

results

on

or

service

provided base

Th

Companys
derives

reportable
its

segments primarily

R-Net

CPS

Infusion therapy physician mail-

the

Companys
revenue and other
is

business

which

revenue

from
to

site

infusion at-risk

R-Nets
groups order

derived

primarily care

from

management
fOr

services

offered

HMOs PPOs

managed
and

organizations
benefit

home

health

services

CPS
and

primarily provides

specialty

pharmacy
services six

pharmacy
the three

management
six

services June

The 30

other 1998

non-reportable
clinical

segment represents
services for

lithotripsy

for

and

months

ended

research

the

three

and

months ended

June 30 1999
interest

Coram
for

uses earnings before of performance inventory

expense income The

taxes

depreciation
for

and

amortization
assets

EBITDA
net accounts

purposes

measurement
and

measurement
and other

basis

segment

includes

receivable

net property

equipment

current

assets

13

CROWLEYKVN

016913

A66

Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR

Document 124-3

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 7 of 30

CORAM
NOTES

I-IEALTHCARE

CORPORATION

FINANCIAL

TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS Continued
is

Summary

information

by segment

as

follows

in thousands
As
Three
of

and

for the

As
Six

of and

for

the

Months
June

Ended

Months
June

Ended 30
1998

30
1998 1999

1999

Infusion

Revenue

from

external revenue

customers

$108430 8202
23

$94724 3784
17 15

$214035 15405
45

$183522 7316
32 46

Intersegment
Interest

income
in

Equity

net

income

of unconsolidated

joint

ventures

Segment Segment Segment R-Net Revenue

EBITDA
assets asset

profit

11461 136535

14353 115408
953

23256 136535 2456

28021 115408 2293

expenditures

965

from external
revenue

customers

23226

$11621

59832

21393

Intersegment
Interest

income
in

15 of unconsolidated
joint

Equity Segnient

net

income

ventures

EB1TDA
assets asset

loss

29429
6608
287

714
6216
500

24498
6608
813

1706
6216
601

Segment Segment

expenditures

CPs
Revenue
from external revenue customers

21011
533

$10580 280

39666
615

19300 499

Intersegment
Interest

income
in

Equity

net

income

of unconsolidated

joint

vcntures 839 519

Segment Segment Segment
All

EBITDA
assets asset

profit

1406 18883
822

837

18883
expenditures 366

7077 70

7077
152

Other from external revenue customers 130 248 218 647

Revenue

Intersegment
Interest

income
in

Equity

net

income

of unconsolidated

joint

ventures

Segment Segment Segment

EBITDA
assets asset

profit

Toss

149
131

127

204
131

293

expenditures

14

CROWLEYKVN

016914

A67

Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR

Document 124-3

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 8 of 30

CORAM HEALTHCARE
NOTES
FINANCIAL
of the
to

CORPORATION

TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS Coutmued
segment

reconciliation

Companys

revenue
in

segment

EBITDA

profit

loss

segment
are

assets as

and

other

significant

items

the corresponding

amounts

the Consolidated

Financial

Statements

follows

in thousands
As
Three of and
for

the

As
Six

Months
June

Ended

and Months
of June

for

the

Ended 30
1998

30
1998 1999

1999

Net Revenues
Total Other
for

reportable

segments

$161402
130 revenue revenue

$120989
248

$329553
218

$232030
647

revenue of intersegment consolidated

Elimination

8735
$152797
Interests

4064
$117173

16020
$313751

7815
$224862

Total

Loss Before
Total Other

Income
profit

Taxes

and
for

Minority reportable

EBITDA EBJTDA

loss
loss
expense

segments

$17129

14158
127

164

27152
293

profit

Goodwill

amortization and other

Depreciation
Interest

amortization

expense

expense

All other Loss Assets Total Other

income
before

expense
income

net

149 2716 2953 7524 6768
interests

2778 2937 6083 6313 3826
$128701 284561 $413262

204 5448 5752
14083 11799 $37l22

5543 5937
20258 13246 $17539

taxes andminority

$37239

assets assets

for

reportable

segments

$162026 278469

$162026 278469 $440495

$128701 284561 $413262

Consolidated

total

assets

$440495

For States

each

of the years presented maintains an

the
infusion to

Companys
operation

primary
in

operations

and the

assets assets

were within
and revenue

the United generated

The Company
business

Canada

however

from

this

are not

material

the

Companys

operations approximately

Net revenue
and 1999

from one
of the

customer

for

the
total

Companys
for for

reportable

segments
for

represented

13%

5%
and

respectively

Companys

consolidated the the
six

net revenue

the three

months
and

ended

June

30

1998

and

17% and and

5%

respectively programs of

months ended

June

30
and

1999

1998

Net revenue
represented
for

from

the

Medicare

Medicaid

Companys 23%

Infusion

CPS

segments

approximately

17% and

23%

respectively and

the

Companys

total

consolidated
for

net revenue
six

the

three

months ended
1999 and

June 30 1999

1998

and

17% and

respectively

the

months

ending

June

30

1998

Subsequent
In

Events

July

1999

Coram

laid ofr

114 employees

in

its

Whippany
result call

New
center

Jersey
lay

office

who were
be

responsible

for to

Costs incurred as managing the Aetna Master Agreement divisions Whippany New Jersey reorganize the R-Net

of these

offs

and other actions taken
will

operations

recognized

in

the

Companys

fnancial

statements

for

the

quarterly

period ended

September

30 1999

15

CR0 WLEYKVN

016915

A68

Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR

Document 124-3

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 9 of 30

ITEM
This defined based
available in

Managements
Quarterly

Discussion

and Analysis

of Financial

Condition

and

Results

of Operations

Report

on

Form

10-Q contains Reform
of

certain

forward-looking
information

statements
relating to

as

such

term
that

is

the Private
beliefs

Securities

Litigation

Act of 1995 and
as well as actual

Coram

are

on

the
to

of the

management
of
in

Coram

assumptions
results

made by
as

and

information

currently

the

management made

Coram The Companys
report

may

vary materially
history

from the forwardlosses

looking

statements

this

due

to

important

factors

such

of

operating equity
in

and

uncertainties rights that

associated
existing

with debt

future

operating limited

results

significant

outstanding
related

indebtedness risks
shifts

conversion
parties large

held by pay
for

holders

liquidity

reimbursement on
relationships

the

mix of

the

Companys
competition
certain

services timing
legal

dependence of
or ability to

with

third

parties

concentration
regulation

of

payors health
trained

industry care

complete

acquisitions on key Stock

government

of the

home
of

industry

proceedings
of

dependence price

personnel

recruitment
listing

and

retention

personnel impacts

potential

volatility

stock

New
in

York

Exchange
Discussion

status

and
of

unantici Financial

pated

from the Year
of

2000 issue

See Item
Risk

Managements
the

and Analysis
Report on

Condition

and Results
for

Operations

Factors

Companys Annual
in this

Form

10-K

as

amended

the year ended

December

31 1998
and current
to

When
similar

used

report
are

the words
to to

estimate project
forward-looking events
actual

believe
statements
currently differ

anticipate Such
available

intend

expect
the
are

expressions of and

intended respect
that

identify

statements information

reflect

views
risks

Coram

with

future cause
are

based
results

on
to to

and

subject
in

uncertainties

could Readers

materially

from those
on these
obligation after

contemplated

such

forward-looking

statements only
as

cautioned

not

place

undue

reliance

forward-looking
to release

statements any
to

which speak
to

of the date

hereof

Coram
to

does
reflect

not undertake events

any

publicly

revisions reflect

these

forward-looking

statements events

or circumstances

the date

hereof

or

the occurrence

of unanticipated

Background
General hospital

The

Company
therapy
specialty clinical

is

engaged

in

four

principal

lines

of

business

alternate

site

outside

the

infusion

and

related

services

ancillary services

network and

management

services

pharmacy

benefit

management
clinical

and
for

mail-order research

pharmacy
and

centralized services medical

management Other
services

administrative
offered respiratory

and

support

trials

medical such

informatics
as

by Coram
therapy

include services

non-intravenous

home

health

products

durable

equipment

and

Business lead
to

Strategy

The

Companys
revenue

overall

business

strategy cost

is

focused

on

the basic control

factors

that

could

profitability

strategic

generation revenue
quality
is

programs

reduction include

and

quality

improvement
relationships alternate

and cash

collections

The
can

Companys
provide the high

generation of care

programs

focus In

on business
the

where the Company
site infusion
its

while
to

operating emphasize
it

profitably marketing

Companys
aimed
at

therapy

business

Company
and

continuing

efforts

improving
of
its

therapy

mix

physician

relationships at

payor

relationships

also

has continued

the development

specialty patients

programs with

aimed

erving

patients

requiring

intravenous
disorders

nutrition
as

and post-transplant pre-

patients and
at-risk

lIlY/AIDS
and other of the
efforts

and

patients

with

chronic
division

such focused reduce
their

hemophilia
on marketing of
their

immune
to

deficiencies

alpha-one physician through focused employer
as

antitrypsin

deficiency

The

R-Net
care

remains
to

HMOs
care the

PPOs

groups

managed

payors
services

desiring utilized

the

cost

health

expenditures
division

management
its

home
on

health

by

members Meanwhile
with with

CPS
plans

has

marketing plans

smaller

health plans care with

including and

companies

self-insured

self-funded needs such and

health and

labor

unions managed
patients
patients

payors

patient populations and of the chronic

specialized

pm-

post-transplant
is

IIV/AIDS
the reach
services

conditions

such

as

diabetes the

asthma
to

The Company
orders
prior for
its

pursuing

plan

to

expand

CPS

division

by developing
with the
site

capability

accept

specialty

mail-order 1999
its

pharmacy
revenues
efforts

over the Internet
in

appearing and

on

the

Internet

to

the
is

end

of

with

beginning toward data with

2000

The

Clinical

Research device

Medical

Informatics
ers that

division benefit that

directing

marketing

pharmaceutical
collection

and

medical

manufactur
offered

can

from the
provide of
their

centralized

management

and

integration to

services

by the most

Company
challenging

can

these
clinical

manufacturers
trials

the

opportunity

complete

some

of

the

aspects

more quickly

16

CROWLEYKVN

016916

A69

Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR

Document 124-3

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 10 of 30

The
control

Company
cost

has

implemented
and of

cost

reduction

and

control

programs

focused

on

the

reduction and review
is

and
of

of

of

services

operating
quality

expenses
in

assessment

of poorly
infusion

performing therapy and
to

branches

branch
closely

efficiencies

Delivery through an

service

the

Companys Company
methods
is

division

in particular patient

being

monitored

internal

task force throughout

more rigorous reporting
the

independent concentrate assessment

satisfaction

surveys by and

Furthermore management improved
billing

continuing

on

reimbursement support

emphasizing support
for

and

cash

collections

and continued

of systems

reimbursement
alternatives currently in
its

Strategic

being

considered
that lines division

by

the permit

Company
the

include

among

others or
into

the
regional

evaluation business

of

potential

acquisitions

markets

would
of

either

through

one

of

principal

business
to transact

Company to grow its local ii CPSs upcoming entrance
business by
in

the

commerce
continued
Inforrnatics strategic

market investment

which
into

would and can

allow

the

over

the

Internet Research

and

iii the
Medical or other terms

development be

of

services

provided growth the
Will

the
its

Clinical

and

division
alternatives

There
will

no
or any

assurance
will

that

any
to

local

or

regional

business acceptable

be

effected that

be

available

Company
be
available

on

commercially
to

and

there can

be

no

assurance

investment

capital

the

Company

Factors Affecting Dispute immediately the case
is

Recent

Operating

Results

with

Aetna

U.S

Healthcare

Inc On June 30 1999 Agreement 2000

the

Company
is

notified

Aetna

that

effective

Coram
presently

had terminated
scheduled
for

the Master
trial

The Company

now

in litigation

with

Aetna

and

in

April

See Part II Item
during
the

Legal
three

Proceedings
six

The
June

Companys
1999
resulted

performance
in losses costs

under under
services

the

Master Agreement
of

and

month periods ended
and

30

the agreement paid and
into

approximately of

$29.l
$371
of

million million

$24.0
$55.4 leakage
as

million million claims
of

respectively respectively

including

of do

accrued

approximately

and
its

These

figures

not take of

account
in

the various claims these
for losses

Aetna

including

Also

due

to

the uncertainties the

litigation

calculating by

Coram

did not include claims and

part

the

recognized
actual

revenue

amounts previously retained
as

Aetna
of
rates

alleged leakage increased

included

only the

capitation

June

30 1999
as

payments received due to higher than
in

revenue

The

costs

service

during

the three been

months ended
by

expected

utilization

which
that

had

previously of the

misrepresented

Aetna

alleged

Corams

lawsuit

The

Company

believes

termination

Master Agreement

was

proper based cash flow

necessary step toward improving its operating profit and upon non-payments by Aetna and was The Company will take statements for costs associated with charge in its third quarter financial the

terminating

Master Agreement
six

in

an

amount

yet

to

be

determined

due

to

the

uncertainties

of

litigation

For the three and of the Master Apart under

month periods ended
represented

June 30 1999

revenue

related

to

the

Companys performance
of
the

Agreement

approximately

7%

and

12%

respectively branches have

Companys
served
in

total

revenue
enrollees for

from the Master Agreement
various

Corams

infusion

therapy

historically

Aetna

agreements fumihed
related to

including
to
all

national
enrollees

ancillary

services

agreement

executed

April 1998 aggregate ended notice

home

infusion

services

Aetna
of
its

not covered with

by the

Master Agreement
the three and
six

The

revenue June from

of

the

Company
it

relationships

Aetna

for

months

30

1999

was approximately
intends
to

13% and

17%
Aetna
terms

respectively 1998

Although

the

Company
for

has not received services with

Aetna

that

terminate

the April did on

national
to

agreement

infusion

the
that

CPS
was

division

received
to

notice
in

from

Aetna

that
its

not intend

renew

its

agreement

CPS

scheduled

expire

accordance

with

September 30 1999
related

The
effects

termination the

of

the

Master Agreement Network
the
services

and

dispute the

with

Aetna
Infusion

may
that

have

other
if for

negative

on

Companys
to

Resource
for

division

and by

in

Companys
to

business
are

example
outside with
if

Aetna
the

refuses

pay

claims or
if

rendered
its

Coram

Aetna

enrollees to

serviced

Master Agreement

Aetna

causes

newly ultimate

acquired impact the

Prudential the

alliliates

cease

doing

business but

Coram The Company
Further
to

Company
not

cannot
in
its

predict dispute

the

dispute could

with incur with

Aetna

may
the

have

the

does

prevail

with

Aetna

Company
fees

additional

substantial litigation

losses
related

the

Company
with

anticipates

incurring

significant

legal

associated

pursuing

the dispute

Aetna

17

CROWLEYKVN

016917

A70

Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR

Document 124-3

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 11 of 30

Other

Factors operating

Affecting

Recent

Operating
financial

Results condition

Other
are as

significant

factors

currently

affecting

the

Companys

performance

and

follows

restructure January

of

its

credit

facilities
its

through

the repayment debt
of for

of

its

former

senior

credit

facility

in

1998

the exchange
in

of 1998

former

subordinated

the issuance Senior

of the Series
Facility in

Notes

and 1998

the Series and the

Notes

June

and
price

the establishment applicable
to

the

New

Credit

August

setting to

of the conversion the
Securities

the Series
offset

Notes

contemplated
interest rate

by the April 1999
applicable
to

amendment
Series

Exchange
in

Agreement
April 1999

by the increased

the

Notes

also

included

such

amendment

ii

expansion

and

improved

sales

efforts

in

the

Companys CPS
infusion

division

iii ongoing
in

pricing private

pressure indemnity

in

the

Companys
to

business

as

result

of an other
forth

unfavorable contracted the

shift

payor

mix from

insurers

managed

care

organizations
table

and
sets

payors

and

intense

competition of the

among

infusion

providers

The

following

approximate

percentages

Companys

infusion

therapy

net revenue

from

certain

categories Months March
1999

of payors Ended

Three June 1999

30

31

June 1998

30

Private Payors

Indemnity

Insurance

and

Other

Non-Contracted

24%
Care Organizations
and Other Contracted

23% 54% 23%

27% 47%
26%

Managed
Payors

54% and
Total

Medicare

Medicaid

Programs

22%

L2
competition through
their

iv
services

increased they
or offer

from

hospitals

and

physicians including

that

have

sought

to

increase the scope those
offered to

of

facilities into

and

offices

services

similar to

by the which
the

Company
they have
services

that

have

entered
control

risk-bearing

relationships

with
variety

third-party

payors care

pursuant

been
offered

delegated by the

over and

the provision of

wide

of health

services

including

Company
staffing

increased
costs

clinical

delivery
derivative

on-call and products
that

other
are

volume
short

related

costs
that

as

well

as increased
required

of

certain

blood

and

blood
patients

in

supply
division in short

have

been

by

the increasing of
patients

numbers of

served
that

by the

Companys infusion
products
that are

and

the increasing

numbers

receiving

the therapies

require

The

supply

18

CROWLEYKVN

016918

A71

Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR

Document 124-3

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 12 of 30

Results

of Operations Quarterly

Certain

Gomparisbns
except per share

Unaudited

in

thousands

data
Three June

Months Msrch
1999

Ended

30

31

June 1998

30

1999

Net revenue
Cost Gross of
service

$152797 146846 5951

$160954 122815 38139

$117173 87882 29291

profit

Operating Selling Provision

expenses general
for

and

administrative
uncollectible

expenses accounts

28680 4452 2716

23829 4161 2732
950

21625 3577 2778
________

estimated

Amortization Restructuring Total Operating Other

of goodwill
costs

operating

expenses

35848

31672 6467

27980 1311

income

loss

29897

income

expenses

Interest

expense

7524
net taxes and minority
interests

6559
210 118 75 428

6083
946

Other

income loss
tax

182

Income Income
Minority

before income

37239
175 579

3826
400
302

expense
in

interests

net

income

of consolidated

joint

ventures

Net
Loss Loss

loss

$37993
common common
share share assuming
dilution

385
0.01 0.01
31 1999

4528
0.09 0.09

per per

0.77 0.77
With Three

Three

Months Ended
per

June 30
share

1999 Compared

Months Ended

March

unaudited

in

millions except

data
decreased
in

Net Revenue
June

Net

revenue
million

$8.3

million or ended

5.2%

to

$152.7

million decrease of

in

the be

quarter
attributed

ended
to

30

1999
in

from
at

$161.0 the

the quarter of

March
in

31 1999
the
are in

The

can

decrease

sales

R-Net
related

division to

$13.4
that

million

current

quarter
in

which

$10.0

million

represented

adjustments and

amounts

presently

dispute
overall

the

litigation in

between

the

Company
partially

Aetna
by an

See Part II Item
increase
in sales sales at

Legal

Proceedings and

The
divisions

decrease
million

net revenue and $2.4

was

offset

the Infusion

CPS

of $2.8

million

respectively

derived

from

internal

growth
$32.2 or
cost million to

Gross Profit ended June
is

Gross from

profit

decreased
million

$5.9 of

million in

or

gross

margin

of 3.9%

in

the quarter

30
due

1999

$38.1
to

gross

margin

23.7%

the quarter
for greater

ended
than

March
anticipated

31 1999
with of

The

reduction and

primarily

increased

of

service to

of $18.9 the the

million division

utilization

decreased

net revenue
as

of $10.0

million In

related

R-Net
infusion

and

certain reflected

costs

associated
cost

the

Master Agreement
relating supplies to variable

discussed
that

above

addition the of

business

higher higher
costs

service

costs

fluctuate

with

number
certain

of

patients

served

and See

of

drugs

and

caused

by

current and Part

market

shortages

blood

products

Factors

Affecting

Recent

Operating

Results

II Item

Legal

Proceedings

Selling General
in

and Administrative June 30 1999
$1.8
million

Expenses
$23.8

SGA increased
in

$4.9 ended

million

or

20.6%

to

$28.7

million in

the quarter quarter

ended 1999

from

million of note

the quarter receivable

March
in

31 1999

Excluding
is

the or

first

of

recovery

the increase

SGA

$3.1

million

13.0% See

Factors

Affecting

Recent Operating

Results

19

CROWLEYKVN

016919

A72

Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR

Document 124-3

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 13 of 30

Operating

Income
June

Loss
1999
is

The

Company
to

had

an

operating

loss

of

$29.9
during
of

million

during

the three

months ended March

30

compared
due

operating
to

income

of $6.5
in

million

the three

months ended
with the

31 1999
in cost

The
of

decline

primarily
million

the decrease

net revenue

$8.3
as

million coupled

increases

service

of $24.0

and

SGA

costs

of $4.9

million

described

above

Net

Loss

Net
for

loss

for

the quarter ended

ended

June 30 1999

was

$38.0
above
$10.0

million

compared
is

to

net

loss

of

$0.4
cost

million service

the quarter

March

31 1999
and
revenue an

As discussed
decrease
in

the decline
million

due

primarily with the

to the

of

increaseS

of $18.9
related

million

of

associated million

Aetna

Master Agreement

and

dispute

and

increase

SGA expense

of $4.9

Three

Months
except

Ended

June 30

1999

Compared

With

Three

Months Ended

June 30

1998

unaudited

in

millions

per share

data
increased
in

Net June

Revenue
1999
million

Net

revenue

$35.5

million

or

30.3%

to

$152.7

million increase
to

in
is

the quarter primarily increase
revenu.e

ended
to

30
$9.9

from $117.2
increase
offset in

million net

the quarter from
shift

ended

June

30 1998
$15.7

The

due

revenue

the infusion
in

business

primarily

due

9.0%
in

in patient

census

partially division

by an

unfavorable
to the

payor

mix ii

million increase and of

net

from the
in

R-Net
revenue
sales

primarily the

relating

from

CPS

division

resulting

Master Agreement number from an increased
Operating

Aetna

iii

$10.1 served

million

increase by

net

patients

generated

internal

growth See Factors
Gross Profit June
results

Affecting

Recent

Results
to

Gross

profit

decreased

$23.4 or

million

$5.9

million or of

gross

margin

of 3.9% June
to

in

the

quarter

ended

30

1999

from $29.3

million

gross margin
million

25.0%

in cost

the quarter ended of
service relating

30
the

1998 Aetna

The

decrease

primarily from
as

the impact See

of $18.9

increased

Master Agreement
Selling General
in

described

above

Factors

Affecting

Recent

Operaling

Results
32.9%
million is

and Administrative
June

Expenses
$21.6

SGA increased
in

$7.1

million

or

to

$28.7

the quarter
to

ended

30

1999

from

million

the quarter ended

June 30 1998

The increase

due

primarily

the growth

of the

R-Net

and

CPS

divisions

See Factors Affecting
million
to

Recent Operating
in

Results

Interest

Expense
from
$6.1

Interest million

expense during
million

increased the three on

by $1.4

$7.5

million

the three
is

months ended
attributable to

June

30

1999

months ended
Credit change

June

30 1998
$3.8 Series

The increase
increase from

the addition Senior

of draws

of $22.5

the Senior and
rate

Facility on the

million

in

the Series
to

Subordinated on April

Unsecured 1999

Notes

Notes

9.875%

11.5%

beginning

Operating

Income
June

Loss
1999
is

The

Company
to

had

an

operating

loss

of

$29.9
during of $23.4

million

during

the

three

months ended
June

30

compared
due

operating
to

income

of $1.3
in

million profit

the three
million

months ended
increase
in

SGA of
Net
for

30 1998
$7.1

The

decline
as

primarily

the decrease

gross

and

million

described

above June 30 1999 above was $38.0
the decline
million to

Loss

Net

loss

for

the quarter ended

compared
attributed to

$4.5

million in

the quarter

ended
and

June

30 1998
in

As discussed
interest

can

be

the decrease

operating income

the increase

expense

See Factors

Affecting

Recent

Operating

Results

Six

Months

Ended
per

June 30
share

1999

Compared

With

Six

Months

Ended

June 30

1998

unaudited

in

millions

except

data
increased
in

Net Revenue
June

Net revenue
$224.9

$88.9
six

million

or

39.6%

to

$313.8

million

in

the
is

six

months ended
to in

30
$23.1

1999

from

million in net

the

months ended- June
the infusion
shift in

30 1998

The increase
due
to

primarily due 10.0%
in

million

increase

revenue

from

business

primarily $46.2

increase

patient

census

partially division

offset

by an

unfavorable
to

payor

mix ii

million increase

net revenue increase
in

from
net

the

R-Net

primarily

relating

the

Aetna Master Agreement
increased

and
of

iii $19.9
patients

million

revenue
sales

from the CPS

division

resulting

from an
Recent

number Results

served

generated

by

internal

growth See Factors Affecting

Operating

20

CROWLEYKVN

016920

A73

Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR

Document 124-3

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 14 of 30

Gross

Profit

Gross

profit

decreased

$12.4
million

million
or

to

$44.1 margin

million

or

gross margin
in

of 14.1% ended

in

the

six

months ended 1998

June 30 1999
results

from $56.5

gross in

of

25.1%

the

six

months
in

June and

30 CPS
costs

The decrease
offset

primarily from
in cost

the increase
service

net revenue with the
costs

discussed

above

the

R-Net

divisions
that

by an
with of

increase

of

associated and

Aetna

Master Agreement
and supplies

variable

fluctuate

the

number

of

patients

served

higher

of drugs

caused

by current

market

shortages

certain

blood

products

See Factors

Affecting

Recent
$9.8

Operating
million

Results 23.0%
to

Selling General
in
is

and Administrative June 30 1999
growth of

Expenses

SGA increased
in

or June

$52.5

million

the due

six

months ended
to

from $42.7
Infusion
for

million

the

six

months ended
division and

primarily

the

the

business and

R-Net
benefits

the

30 1998 The increase CPS division Expenses
with additional

increased personnel Affecting

primarily such
as

from business
additional
rent

growth
for office

salary

along

with

costs

associated

space

telephone

and

business

insurance

expense

See Factors

Recent Operating Income

Results The Company had an operating
to loss

Operating ended June

Loss
compared
operating million

of

$23.4

million six

during the

six

months

30

1999
in

operating
is

income

of

$1.0
to

million

during
in

the

months ended
of $12.4

June

30

1998
with

The decrease
an

income
in

due
for

primarily

the decline ended June

increase of $9.8 Costs

SGA

gross

profit

million coupled

the quarter

30 1999
million

Restructuring
relating to

The
of the

Company

recorded

approximately
structure

$0.9

of

charges the
first

in

March
of

1999

reorganization

Companys management
expense decreased the
six to

completed
to

during
million

quarter

1999

Interest

Expense

Interest

by

$6.1

million

$14.1

in

the

six
is

months ended
primarily with
to

June

30

1999

from $20.2
million

million during
in interest

months ended
the Rollover of $3.2
to

June

30 1998
in interest

The decrease
in to

due

decrease
Securities

of $10.3

related

Note which

was cancelled
relating

connection the Warrants
of $7.1

the

Exchange

Agreement

and

decrease
related

million Securities

issued

under

the Rollover
to

Note

offset

Note Net

the

Unaudited
During

by Condensed
six

interest

the

Exchange
as

Agreement
of June

million

See

Consolidated ended of

Financial June

Statements the the

30 1999
net
loss

Loss
million

the
to

months
net
loss

30 1999
during
in

Company
six

recognized June

of

$38.4
discussed decrease

compared
the decline

$19.7
to

million

months ended income

30 1998
offset

As
by

above
in

can

be

attributed

the decrease Recent

operating

loss

partially

interest

expense See Factors

Affecting

Operating

Results

Liquidity

and

Capital uses working

Resources cash

The
Facility to

Company
fund
its

generated

from operations and
and operations
at

available

credit

under

the

New
capital

Senior
as

Credit

capital

requirements
to

The Companys working

of June

30
cash due

1999 the and
to

was $59.7
six

million

compared

$64.6

million

December
in

31 1998
assets

decrease
related to

of $4.9

million During
in

months ended
equivalents

June 30 1999
of $7.9 million increase
in

the primary

increases
in

current

an increase

cash

ii
in

an increase
sales

net accounts

receivable and

of $6.4

million primarily

an

approximate and due

three day

days

outstanding million the

DSO
The
Senior

additional in

sales

vOlume

at

the

CPS
was

division primarily purchases medical primarily

iii
to

decrease

inventory

of

$4.2 on

increase Credit and
in

cash

and

cash

equivalents and

borrowings consisted
for

net of of

repayments
million for

New

Facility Property and

equipment
of durable

primarily equipment

$2.1

computer
liabilities

systems

software the
six

the purchase June

$1.6

million Total
in

current

increased
million to

months ended
with

30

1999

due

to

an

increase million through the the

accounts changes

payable

of

$19.4
relate

coupled

decrease
for the

in

accrued
division

compensation business with

of $3.3

These
June

primarily

expenses

recognized

R-Net

Aetna

30 1999
did

As of June Under
defined borrowing $60.0 by
as

30 1999
of

Company

not have Credit

any

material

commitments
funds
the

for

capital

expenditures
to

the terms
the

New

Senior

Facility the
is

maximum
equal the
to

available

the the

Company
of

Revolving
as

Credit

Commitment
to

an

amount
or

lesser

of
credit

Companys

base

calculated

pursuant the

the agreement

total

revolving

commitment

million of

As of June 30 1999
obligations

Companys
million

Revolving
revolver

Credit

Commitment
of $22.5

was

$59.1 the

million Offset
total available

letter

credit

of $17.1

and

borrowings

million

21

CROWLEYKVN

016921

A74

Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR

Document 124-3

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 15 of 30

credit

under

the

New

Senior Credit Credit

Facility

was $19.5 was
$58.7

million

as

of June
that

30 1999 As
$37.0
to

of August
million letters of

16

1999

the

Companys Revolving
against

Commitment
Facility

million $14.5

Of

amount
relating

had been
credit

drawn

the

New
in

Senior

Credit

which

includes

million

the

that

had

been

delivered

accordance
totaling

with the
$2.5

Aetna

Master Agreement
total available in

In

addition
facility certain

after
is

deducting
million

the other
as

letters

of credit

obligations

million the

under

the with

$19.2

of

August

16
set

1999
forth

As of June 30 1999
in
its

the

Company was
be

not

compliance

financial

and from

other covenants
its

principal

debi

agreements The
can

Company has however
as to

received

waivers

lenders regarding occur
in future

such

noncompliance
and whether

There any

no assurance
waivers
will

whether

further at

covenant
that

violations

will to

periods

necessary Financial

be

forthcoming

time See Note

the Unaudited

Condensed

Consolidated

Statements
reduction Master
in liquidity

The Company has experienced
described above debt
letter to
it

due

to

the higher than draws on
if

expected of

costs

of

service

as

with by of

respect $14.5
credit

to

the

Agreement
will

and

Aetnas

letters

credit

that
fail

increased use the

outstanding $14.5
million

million proceeds

Liquidity
to satisfy

be

further of

reduced

Aetna

should

to for

claims

participating

providers

against

Coram Aetna
the

services

rendered
that at

prior

June 30 1999
does not intend
faith

when
to

Coram
utilize

terminated

the

Master Agreement
letters to

and

has indicated

present
to

so

the funds
all

from
costs

the

of credit Although the Master

Company
due
costs to

has the be

sought

record of

good

estimate be

of

service that

related

Agreement
all

uncertainties presently

litigation If

there can does

no assurance
letter

the exact
credit

amount and nature of
to satisfy

such of

can

identified for services

Aetna
rendered

not use the
to

of

proceeds
additional

the claims should sources time
arise

participating to

providers Master

prior

June need

30
to

1999 seek

or

if

liabilities alternative at the

related liquidity
is

the

Agreement
is

the
to

Company
assess

may

additional

or

of
it

The
its

Company
business under

continuing

the impact plans
for for

of

the

Master Agreement
and cash

sane

reviewing and

plan and

formulating with
its

revised

operations
possible

flow without of and
its

the Master debt banks

Agreement agreements
and
private

is

discussions
also

current have

lenders

restructuring

principal

The

Company
sources

continues

to

discussions with of
capital to for

other commercial
its

investment
its

equity

regarding consider
will

other sources
strategic

refinancing any

debt

to

address

liquidity

needs The Company no assurance
that

may

also

alternatives

provide

needed

liquidity

There

can

be

the

Company
Year
effect

be

able

to

obtain

any

needed

liquidity

on

commercially

acceptable with the

terms Year 2000
all

2000

Issues

The
have

Company
on
third identified

believes

the payors

most
such

significant as

risk

problem
effects to

is

the

such

issues

may
in

party

Medicare
failure

While

of

the

of

such

noncompliance

have

not been timely

by the could

Company
the these with

any

of these

third

party due

payors
to

resolve

Year 2000
the

problems
of

manner

impact

Companys
payors
attribute

capital the

availability

slow

down

in

payment

accounts
to

receivable which be

associated can

While
to

Company
2000 impact
require

has noL
at

incurred any

any

payment payor no
adverse
available to

issues

date can

management
that

directly issues

the

Year
an and

problem could the

specific

assurance on

made

payment
to

will

not occur from

Such

have

material
to

effect capital

the

Companys

ability

generate

cash

operations delays

Company

use due by

from the

New

Senior Credit by
third

Facility

Significant

in collecting capital

accounts
to

receivable

Year 2000 problems
the
to

experienced base under

party payors of the

could

reduce

the

available

the

Company

reducing

borrowing the

the terms

New
the

Senior

Creait

Facility In
to

addition debt

such

payment

delays due

Year
Costs

2000 problem could Of
the

impact

Companys
accrued

ability

meet
costs

its

obligations estimates

Restructure
that

$3.2

million

of remaining
in

restructure

the

Company
June

thefuture June
to

cash

expenditures

will

be

made

the following and

periods June

35% through

30 2000

16%

through
subject

30 2001
it

17% through
and

June 30 2002

32% through
to successfully as

30 2003
1999 be

and
its

thereafter business future
or that

Although the

future
believes

adjustment has

the

Companys
and
is

ability liquidity that

implement

strategy

Company
related will to

adequate there

reserves

of

June

30
will

to

meet

expenditures the

the plans
sufficient

However
working

no
to

assurance

the

reserves

adequate

Company

generate

capital

meet future

expenditures

Year

2000

Issues

Background
calendar year data

Some computers
is

software only two

and

other

equipment of
this

include design

programming
decision

code
of

in

which

abbreviated

to

digits

As

result

some

these

systems

22

CROWLEYKVN

016922

A75

Case 1:04-cv-01565-SLR

Document 124-3

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 16 of 30

could These

fail

to

operate
are

or

fail

to

produce
to

correct

results in

if

00

is

interpreted
severity as

to

mean

1900

rather

than

2000
are

problems

widely
to as

expected

increase

frequency

and

the year

2000 approaches

and

commonly

referred

the

Millennium
2000 the

Bug

or

Year 2000 Problem
affect

Assessment
operated programs
or

The

Year
by
to

Problem

could

computers
the

software
is

and

other
its

equipment
internal

used

maintained systems

Company
that

Accordingly and

Company
will

reviewing

computer

and

ensure

the

programs
believes

systems

be

Year

2000

compliant of the

Internal

Infrastructure

The

Company
and
related to

that

it

has
in

identified

substantially

all

major
that

computers

software

applications

equipment
the

used

connection

with

its

internal to

operations
its

must be modified

upgraded
the

or replaced

minimize
activity as

possibility to

of material

disruption

business

The
of
all

Company
major
--

has

completed
that

majority of
identified for

related

the modification

upgrade

or replacement
all

systems
fully

have and

been

adversely tracking
collections

affected

by Year
accounting

2000
payroll
fully

To

date

work

has

been

completed
admissions Systems
for

tested

systems

asset

general-

branch

operations including and
in

pharmacy

management Network
division

billing

and

inventory
billing benefit

are

operational

compliance support our

our Resource

Group
for

are

compliant the

for

and

collections

Systems and mail

that

Coram
systems upgraded by

Prescription have and been
are

Services

both
that

pharmacy
our
for

management

order

pharmacy
have been

completed
in

Systems

support
call

Home

Medical Equipment
to

locations

also

operation

Current of

plans

the

Company

complete of the

final

systems

remediation claims

September

30 1999

These

areas

remediation

include

the upgrade

Resource

Network

adjudication
to

system final deployment hardware our data communications Year 2000
calculations

of our inventory and upgrade
or

management
replacement

system minor turnkey software upgrades
of personal

computer

equipment

that

does

not support

Suppliers any
potential to

At the end
adverse

of

1998

the

company
the
first

formally
six

communicated we

with have

its

major suppl