Free Answer - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:04-cv-00487-LB

Document 8

Filed 07/12/2004

Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation Plaintiff, v.

THE UNITED STATES, Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 04-487C (Judge Block)

DEFENDANT'S ANSWER For its answer to the plaintiff's complaint, defendant admits, denies, and alleges as follows: 1.1 Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 1.1 for lack of knowledge or

information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 1.2 1.3 1.4. Admits. Admits. Admits the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 1.4. Admits

the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 1.4 to the extent supported by the assignment cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 1.4. Admits the allegations contained in the third sentence of paragraph 1.4. 1.5. The allegations contained in paragraph 1.5 constitute conclusions of law to which

no answer is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied.

Case 1:04-cv-00487-LB

Document 8

Filed 07/12/2004

Page 2 of 7

2.1.

Admits the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 2.1. The

allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 2.1 constitute conclusions of law to which no answer is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 3.1. Admits the allegations contained in the first and second sentences of paragraph

3.1 to the extent supported by the contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the first and second sentences of paragraph 3.1. Admits the allegations contained in the third sentence of paragraph 3.1. 3.2. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 3.2 to the extent supported by the

contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 3.2. 3.3. Admits the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 3.3 to the

extent supported by the contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 3.3. The allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 3.3 constitute conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of its case to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 3.4. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 3.4 to the extent supported by the

contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 3.4. 3.5. Admits the allegations contained in the first, fifth, and sixth sentences of

paragraph 3.5 to the extent supported by the contract cited, which is the best evidence of its 2

Case 1:04-cv-00487-LB

Document 8

Filed 07/12/2004

Page 3 of 7

contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the first, fifth, and sixth sentences of paragraph 3.5. Admits the allegations contained in the second, third, and fourth sentences of paragraph 3.5. 3.6. Denies the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 3.6. Denies the

allegations contained in the second and third sentences of paragraph 3.6 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 3.7. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 3.7 for lack of knowledge or

information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 4.1. 4.2. Admits. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 4.2 for lack of knowledge or

information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 4.3. The allegations contained in paragraph 4.3 constitute conclusions of law and

plaintiff's characterization of its case to which no answer is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 4.4. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 4.4 to the extent supported by the

daily reports cited, which are the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 4.4. 4.5. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 4.5 to the extent supported by the

letter cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 4.5. 4.6. Denies the allegations contained in the first and second sentences of paragraph 4.6

for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. Admits the 3

Case 1:04-cv-00487-LB

Document 8

Filed 07/12/2004

Page 4 of 7

allegations contained in the third sentence of paragraph 4.6. 4.7. The allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 4.7 constitute

conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of its case to which no answer is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Admits the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 4.7 to the extent that RSC used a dump scow to implement a clamshell dredging operation on or about August 21, 2000; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 4.7. Admits the allegations contained in the third sentence of paragraph 4.7. Admits the allegations contained in the fourth sentence of paragraph 4.7 to the extent that RSC did not complete the required dredging during the 2000 construction season; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the fourth sentence of paragraph 4.7. Admits the allegations contained in the fifth sentence of paragraph 4.7 to the extent that RSC shut down for the winter and resumed operations during a third construction season in 2001; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the fifth sentence of paragraph 4.7. Admits the allegations contained in the sixth sentence of paragraph 4.7 to the extent that the remaining dredging work of approximately 230,000 yards was performed in 2001 by Western Marine Construction, or its subcontractor; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the sixth sentence of paragraph 4.7. 5.1. Admits the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 5.1 to the

extent that on November 5, 2001, the Government received a request for equitable adjustment from RSC, containing a certification by RSC's vice president, alleging a differing site condition; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 5.1. Admits the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 5.1 to the extent supported by the REA 4

Case 1:04-cv-00487-LB

Document 8

Filed 07/12/2004

Page 5 of 7

cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 5.1. 5.2. Admits the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 5.2 to the

extent that the contracting officer issued a final decision dated November 26, 2003; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 5.2. Denies the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 5.2. 5.3. 6.1. Admits. Defendant's responses to paragraphs 1.1 through 5.3 of the complaint are

incorporated by reference. 6.2. 7.1. Denies. Defendant's responses to paragraphs 1.1 through 6.2 of the complaint are

incorporated by reference. 7.2. Denies the allegations contained in the first, third, and fourth sentences of

paragraph 7.2. Admits the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 7.2 to the extent supported by the contract, which is the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 7.2. 7.3. The allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 7.3 constitute

conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of its case to which no answer is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 7.4. Denies the allegations contained in the introductory statement of paragraph 7.4.

Admits the allegations contained in paragraphs 7.4(a) through 7.4(d) to the extent supported by ASTM 2488, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations 5

Case 1:04-cv-00487-LB

Document 8

Filed 07/12/2004

Page 6 of 7

contained in paragraph 7.4(a) through 7.4(d). 7.5. The allegations contained in paragraph 7.5 constitute conclusions of law to which

no answer is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 8.1. Defendant's responses to paragraphs 1.1 through 7.5 of the complaint are

incorporated by reference. 8.2. The allegations contained in paragraph 8.2 constitute conclusions of law to which

no answer is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 8.3. The allegations contained in paragraph 8.3 constitute conclusions of law to which

no answer is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 9.1. Defendant's responses to paragraphs 1.1 through 8.3 of the complaint are

incorporated by reference. 9.2. The allegations contained in paragraph 9.2 constitute conclusions of law to which

no answer is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 10. Denies that plaintiff is entitled to the relief set forth in the prayer for relief

immediately following paragraph 9.2, or to any relief whatsoever. 11. Denies each and every allegation not previously admitted or otherwise qualified. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 12. Plaintiff's claim is barred by payment. WHEREFORE, defendant request that the Court enter judgment in its favor, order that the complaint be dismissed, and grant defendant such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.

6

Case 1:04-cv-00487-LB

Document 8

Filed 07/12/2004

Page 7 of 7

Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General DAVID M. COHEN Director

s/ James M. Kinsella JAMES M. KINSELLA Deputy Director

s/ David R. Feniger DAVID R. FENIGER Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor 1100 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Tel. (202) 307-3390 Fax (202) 305-2118 Attorneys for Defendant July 12, 2004

7