Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 32.3 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 12, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 538 Words, 3,268 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/19615/39.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of Federal Claims ( 32.3 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:05-cv-00217-LAS

Document 39

Filed 12/12/2007

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ARBITRAJE CASA DE CAMBIO, SA. DE C.V. et al., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 05-217C (Senior Judge Smith)

DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME, OUT OF TIME, WITHIN WHICH TO FILE ITS RESPONSE Pursuant to Rules 6(b)(2) and 6.1 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"), defendant, the United States, respectfully requests that this Court grant an enlargement of 26 days, to and including December 31, 2007, within which to prepare and file our response to plaintiff's complaint in the above-captioned matter. Pursuant to RCFC 12(a), defendant's response was due on December 5, 2007. This is our first request for an enlargement of time for this purpose. Plaintiff's counsel has indicated that plaintiff does not oppose this motion. This request is necessary because this case was recently reassigned to the undersigned counsel at the Department of Justice, after the Court issued its November 19, 2007 Order denying defendant's motion to dismiss. The undersigned was unaware that a response to plaintiff's complaint had not yet been filed. It was indisputably defendant's counsel's obligation to file a timely response, but our failure to do so was the result of excusable neglect, in that the undersigned did not become aware that a response had not been filed until after he began his review of the case materials. Our failure to file a response was not a willful violation of this Court's rules. We apologize to the Court and to opposing counsel for not meeting the deadline,

Case 1:05-cv-00217-LAS

Document 39

Filed 12/12/2007

Page 2 of 3

and regret any inconvenience this may have caused the Court or opposing counsel. The requested enlargement of time is necessary to allow defendant's counsel an opportunity to review the case and its procedural history, which dates back to 2003, coordinate the contents of our response with agency counsel, and obtain the necessary internal review prior to its filing. For the foregoing reasons, defendant respectfully requests that the Court grant its motion for an enlargement of time of 26 days, to and including December 31, 2007, in which to file the Government's response to plaintiff's complaint. Respectfully submitted, JEFFREY S. BUCHOLTZ Acting Assistant Attorney General JEANNE E. DAVIDSON Director

s/Mark A. Melnick MARK A. MELNICK Assistant Director

s/ Anuj Vohra ANUJ VOHRA Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor, 1100 L St. Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: (202) 353-0521 Fax: (202) 305-7644 December 12, 2007 Attorneys for Defendant - 2 -

Case 1:05-cv-00217-LAS

Document 39

Filed 12/12/2007

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on December 12, 2007, a copy of the foregoing "Defendant's Unopposed Motion For An Enlargement Of Time, Out Of Time, Within Which To File Its Response" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system.

s/Anuj Vohra

- 3 -