Free Response to Cross Motion [Dispositive] - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:05-cv-00999-MMS

Document 24-6

Filed 06/12/2006

Page 1 of 4

Exhibit L

Case 1:05-cv-00999-MMS

Document 24-6

Filed 06/12/2006

Page 2 of 4

SKADDEN0

ARP,S', SLATE,
1,440 NEWYORK WASHINGTON,
TIEL_ (20;_

MEAGHER
AVENUE. N.W..

& FLOM

LLP
I,-em, i/_mMM-rl: _N:I¢IS

DC _OOO.R-;Zlll
37]-7000

UOk'l'_ CHIt, AGO ' NOus'roI4 NL'WANK NIW YOI_K PALO ALtO JIAI4 FItAN_ W/41.11NCl_N. 0., Wlt,M|M6"fOM III_IJIING BIIUliSIU...S PRANKFUFIV 'HI3NG

FAY_:(ZO:'1393-5760

March 31, 2004

M¢I41COW P_IB SINGAPIDIII[ Irtmil_ TOm'O _WlO VIENNA

.

°.

stumD:Qi_z_ _.
Senior,Trial Attome3

U.8.Dopmm_ ofJzmkz
Tax Dividon, Civil Trial Ss_tion,

_wtemRq_n
P.O. Box 227 B_a _Station

w_o.,

D..c.20044

_:
Desr Mr. Gibsom

_GLLP

Ti_ k_a"r_
of the _ co_

to Your. _ 1

of_la_: 9 and 10,2O04,aaa,in anti_-_ation
forthour

sch_lul_l for Alm'l 1, 2004 _foro Chief Jud_ Hogan, _

views on how tlie key issues'van be addressed "inthat..fonnn. We would be. happy to discus. these issues in advance o:f'.thesta_ conference ffyou so desire.

REDACTED

RHTC001972

Case 1:05-cv-00999-MMS

Document 24-6

Filed 06/12/2006

Page 3 of 4

March31, 2OO4 Page2

RF_DACTEV

A relatedsituationiivol_s two_

wi,o"have_

an _on'in

U_-t_

· States Di_ct Court for theN.c_h_a Distfi_.ofTexas._ to.restrain KPMG .fromproviding their na0mesto the ]_. First, w_ we,l_e the'Tax Division's decision to imvrve_ Lnthe.John Doe maim, as KPMG has _no infarct in pro_ the _olm Does' identities fix_m the'l_. As we M.w dis_sod, the lolm Doe .pl_in_ffs in _ mstm may. l_ve been i_e r_i_ of the engagement letters _ced in one of.your letters to us dated Marc& 9, 2004. On Mamh 26, 2004, KInG filed a m__ in support of its _ross.mo_m for summaryjudgmmt in the John Doe matter in which KPMG _ that, based on the facts set _ in the p/trtics' joint stipulation, as a matter of law no pri_ protects the _o_ I_s' i_ from disclosure to ihe ]RS. Moreover, in response to the sta_ of limimiom issue that your Office raised ifi its letter to,Baker & Mc.Kenzie of MarcA I9, 200_" KPMG alto fried a motion on Mate& 26, 2(104 seeki_ an ex_litious resolution of the summary iudgment question.

REDACTED

RHTC001973

Case 1:05-cv-00999-MMS

Document 24-6

Filed 06/12/2006

Page 4 of 4

D.Gibson, Esq.
March31, 2004

*Pa_3

REDACTED

Sincerely,

u::

Mi_l Salem _Pamm C_I Wei_

.o.

RHTC_1974