Free Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 17.8 kB
Pages: 4
Date: January 16, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 545 Words, 3,607 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/21020/27.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery - District Court of Federal Claims ( 17.8 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:06-cv-00113-MBH

Document 27

Filed 01/16/2007

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

) OAK ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.,) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action ) No. 06-113C ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ____________________________________)

PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY Pursuant to United States Court of Federal Claims Rule 6.1, Plaintiff, Oak Environmental Consultants, Inc., respectfully requests an enlargement of time to complete discovery of thirty days from January 17, 2007 through and including February 16, 2007. No previous request has been

made regarding an extension of the discovery deadline. Defendant's counsel consents to the requested enlargement. The Court issued an Order on November 13, 2006 establishing a discovery cutoff date of January 17, 2007, and granting the Plaintiff the right to conduct limited discovery. The Plaintiff served its First Request for

Production of Documents on the Defendant on November 16, 2006 and a response was due on or about December 17, 2006.

1

Case 1:06-cv-00113-MBH

Document 27

Filed 01/16/2007

Page 2 of 4

Given the short discovery period, the Plaintiff requested that the "documents be provided as soon as possible." It

was the Plaintiff's expectation that the documents would be furnished promptly so that depositions could proceed in an orderly fashion after the receipt and review of the documents. The Plaintiff's request was specific and was

limited to six inquiries. The Defendant responded to the request for documents on December 20, 2006 by generally objecting to each request, but nevertheless offering to make "non-privileged, responsive documents available for inspection and copying at a mutually convenient time at the Litigation Headquarters, Washington Navy Yard." The Plaintiff

responded by letter the same day, December 20, 2006, asking that that the documents be made available during the next two weeks so that depositions could be completed during the week of January 9, 2007. Defendant's counsel has stated that the holiday period and the unavailability of agency counsel due to travel, made it impossible to provide the documents prior to the discovery cutoff date. In addition, Defendant's counsel

has stated that he will provide dates for inspection of the documents within the next few days and that agency counsel

2

Case 1:06-cv-00113-MBH

Document 27

Filed 01/16/2007

Page 3 of 4

is in the process of locating the persons to be deposed and that the requested deponents will be made available. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff, Oak Environmental Consultants, Inc., respectfully requests that the Court grant an enlargement of time, through and including February 16, 2007, for the parties to complete discovery. Respectfully submitted, s/ Michael H. Payne Michael H. Payne, Esquire Payne Hackenbracht & Sullivan 220 Commerce Dr., Suite 100 Fort Washington, PA 19034 Tel: 215-542-2777 Fax: 215-542-2779 E-mail: [email protected] Attorney for Oak Environmental Consultants,Inc.

3

Case 1:06-cv-00113-MBH

Document 27

Filed 01/16/2007

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF FILING

I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that on this 16 day of January 2007, a copy of the foregoing "Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for An Enlargement Of Time To Complete Discovery" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system.
th

s/Michael H. Payne

4