Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 28.8 kB
Pages: 4
Date: October 18, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 459 Words, 2,931 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/21020/23.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims ( 28.8 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:06-cv-00113-MBH

Document 23

Filed 10/18/2006

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OAK ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 06-113C (Judge Horn)

DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Pursuant to United States Court of Federal Claims Rule 6.1, defendant, the United States, respectfully requests an enlargement of time of two days, from October 18, 2006, through and including October 20, 2006, to file the Government's motion for summary judgment. We previously were granted enlargements of Plaintiff's counsel has

time totaling 22 days for this purpose.

indicated that he does not oppose this motion. This action arises from a Navy construction contract. On

September 22, 2006, the parties' joint stipulation of facts and appendix were filed. The Government has worked diligently upon

its summary judgment motion, has submitted the motion for internal review, and has obtained the comments of the reviewer. However, based upon the reviewer's comments, additional work still needs to be done before the motion can be filed. Accordingly, we request a brief, two-day enlargement of time to file our summary judgment motion. This will ensure that we

file a memorandum of law that thoroughly and clearly addresses

Case 1:06-cv-00113-MBH

Document 23

Filed 10/18/2006

Page 2 of 4

the relevant legal issues, and that will be of assistance to the Court in deciding our motion. We did not file this motion sooner

because we did not know until the afternoon of October 18, 2006 that an enlargement of time would be required. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, defendant, the United States, respectfully requests that this Court grant an enlargement of time, through and including October 20, 2006, to file defendant's motion for summary judgment. Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General DAVID M. COHEN Director

2

Case 1:06-cv-00113-MBH

Document 23

Filed 10/18/2006

Page 3 of 4

s/Steven J. Gillingham STEVEN J. GILLINGHAM Assistant Director s/Richard P. Schroeder RICHARD P. SCHROEDER Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit Eighth Floor 1100 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: (202) 305-7562 Attorneys for Defendant October 18, 2006

3

Case 1:06-cv-00113-MBH

Document 23

Filed 10/18/2006

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that on this 18th day of October 2006, a copy of the foregoing "DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system. s/Richard P. Schroeder

4