Free Exhibit List - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 30.5 kB
Pages: 4
Date: December 18, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,184 Words, 8,058 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/21048/43.pdf

Download Exhibit List - District Court of Federal Claims ( 30.5 kB)


Preview Exhibit List - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:06-cv-00146-TCW

Document 43

Filed 12/18/2007

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

TETRA TECH EC, INC.,

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________)

Fed. Cl. No. 06-146C (Judge Wheeler)

PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT LIST

Plaintiff Tetra Tech, EC, Inc, pursuant to the Court's order dated July 27, 2007, as amended on December 10, 2007, respectfully submits the following exhibit list.

No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

Date Dec-95 23-Jun-00 29-Aug-00 20-Jun-01 26-Jul-01 15-Aug-01 23-Aug-01 23-Aug-01

Description Ordnance Survey 7600 Final Report covering Fort Meade including Task Order 0006 acreage with missing pages provided during discovery attached USACE Ordnance and Explosive Response Engineer Manual (Chapter 4 only) requires Gov. approval of Work Plans Base Contract DACA87-00-D-0039 w/ Data Item Description (DID) OE-005-05 as only attachment Independent Government Estimate for Task Order 006 based on 40 "anomalies" per acre RFP with July 11, 2001 Scope of Work attached Pre-proposal Questions and Answers of August 15, 2001 and August 21, 2001 Tetra Tech e-mail to John Potter requesting clarification Government internal email forwarding Clarification anticipating 20 UXO or UXO-Like Items from Chason Smith to Dussault indicating clarification was reviewed, approved and/or written by Potter Government E-mail from Dussault (Gov.) to Tetra Tech forwarding Clarification to RFP Requirement w/ No Extension on Closing Date Tetra Tech's Technical Approach and Basis of Estimate (Initial Technical Proposal) Cover forwarding as Enclosure Tetra Tech's September 13, 2001 Revised Proposal (Technical Approach and Basis of Estimate) (Protected Information Enclosed) "Post Negotiation Memorandum" and "Analysis of Contractor Proposals" stating Tetra Tech had "clear understanding of the SOW" (Protected

9.

23-Aug-01

10. 27-Aug-01 11. 17-Sep-01 12. 17-Sep-01

1

Case 1:06-cv-00146-TCW

Document 43

Filed 12/18/2007

Page 2 of 4

Information Enclosed) 13. 01-Oct-02 Data Item Description (DID) OE-005-05.1 illustrates DID OE-005-05 14. 28-Mar-02 Geophysical Prove Out Non-Time Critical Ordnance and Explosives Removal Action with Approval Letter and Design Review Comments 15. 10-Apr-02 Work Plan (w/ CEHND Form 7 Review/Approval Sheets) 16. 2-Dec-02 Tetra Tech Proposals for Mod 3 w/ January 23 and 24, 2003 supplements 17. 13-Jan-03 A. Prenegotiation Objectives and cost/Price Analysis for Mod 3 2-Feb-03 2-Feb-03 18. 30-Jan-03 19. 28-Mar-03 20. 16-Apr-03 B. Price Negotiation Memorandum

C. Price Negotiation Memorandum w/ Table setting forth acreage breakdown Modification 03 of Task Order 006 executed 5-Feb-01 E-mail from Chason Smith to Tim Reese showing intrusive investigations have begun Foster Wheeler Letter to Contracting Officer Tadesse advising of unanticipated high levels of UXO-like items 21. 21-Apr-03 Letter from Delaney to Tadesse re Request for Guidance on How to Proceed with Removal Action in Range No. 1 at Fort Meade with related e-mails 22. 23-Apr-03 E-mail from Tetra Tech to Durham advising Discrimination Criteria are Posted on FTP Website and Durham email to Project Manager Chason Smith forwarding Discrimination Criteria 23. 9-May-03 Letter from Tetra Tech (Delaney) to Contracting Officer Tadesse forwarding 29-Apr-03 Meeting Minutes "for your review" 24. 10-Oct-03 Tetra Tech letter to Contracting Officer Tadesse "to reiterate" re increased costs for unanticipated high levels of UXO/UXO-like items based on geophysical interpretation 25. 15-Dec-03 Bob Selfridge e-mail to Chason Smith- Performance based Contracting approach did not work well 26. 2003/2004 Ft Meade 2003 and 2004 Access Databases (Protected Information Enclosed) (Protected Information Enclosed) 27. 27-Feb-04 Slovak e-mail to Chason Smith forwarding spreadsheets setting forth Slovak's allowable UXO/UXO like count for 5 of 23 areas 28. 7-Apr-04 Townsend Email forwarding Data Bases A. (1) 20-Nov-03 Ballfields; (2) 850 page Database version B. (1) 20-Nov-03 Lake Allen; (2) 850 page Database version Tetra Tech Request for Equitable Adjustment non Area G Chason Smith email to Potter with cc to Slovak questioning acre count and showing 4 to 5 UXO-like items per acre Request for Equitable Adjustment Area G w/ Attachments (related correspondence) Letter from Tadesse to Dave Moccia re REAs offering $219,080 for Area G and non-Area G Slovak e-mail to Slater (advises that until someone decides whether UXO like is determined geophyisically or after excavation his review "spreadsheets is not going to change anything) Townsend email to Galloway discussing using xl filters to develop UXO-Like count E-mail from Potter to Slater re definition of UXO-like

29. 7-Apr-04 30. 25-Jul-04 31. 17-Sep-04 32. 9-Feb-05 33. 10-Jun-05 34. 20-Jun-05 35. 6-Jul-05

2

Case 1:06-cv-00146-TCW

Document 43

Filed 12/18/2007

Page 3 of 4

36. 22-Aug-05 Contracting Officer Tadesse letter to Tetra Tech Offering $341,482.23 final decision amount 37. 7-Sep-05 A. RFP and Scope of Work for Fort Benning requirement with Specific Language intended to prohibit price adjustments for unanticipated high anomaly counts 13-Oct-05 B. Performance Work Statement for Former Raritan Arsenal, New Jersey

23-May-07 C. Performance Work Statement for Former Erie Army Depot, Ohio 38. 23-Sep-05 E-mail from Potter to David Morrow stating HNC should pay Tetra Tech the $345k and negotiate the other $1m 39. 30-Nov-05 Final Decision 40. 19-Dec-05 E-mail from Slater to Holcomb agreeing that Final Report should be delayed until scrap accounting is complete 41. 1-Jun-06 Final Report (Deliverable) 42. 8-Aug-06 Brendan Slater email to M. Simmons with estimate for final decision (including CD) 43. 17-Jan-07 Expert Report 44. 22-Jan-07 Notice of Depositions pursuant to 30(b)(6) 13-Feb-07 14-Feb-07 15-Feb-07 16-Feb-07 07-Jun-07 A. Brendan Slater Deposition Transcript - pursuant to 30(b)(6) B. Michael Slovak Deposition Transcript - pursuant to 30(b)(6) C. Robert Selfridge Deposition Transcript - pursuant to 30(b)(6) D. Jason Adams Deposition Transcript - pursuant to 30(b)(6) E. Charles Townsend Deposition Transcript- pursuant to 30(b)(6)

26-Jul-07 F. Conference Call Hearing Transcript re 30(b)(6) testimony and deponents 45. 09-Mar-07 Recalculation of Government Estimate Correcting Formula Only 46. 09-Mar-07 Recalculation of Government estimate plus (1) Actual UXOs with Zeros; and (2) difference between Slovak Review of 5 Areas and Filtered Database 47. 13-Mar-07 Recalculation of Government estimate plus (1) Actual UXOs with Zeros; (2) difference between Slovak Review of 5 Areas and Filtered Database; and (3) zero for weight and no upper bounds 48. 11-Jun-07 John C. Potter Deposition Transcript 49. 12-Jun-07 Lydia B. Tadesse Deposition Transcript 50. Tetra Tech letter responding to 948's #16,28,41,43, 54 (August 1-5, 2003)(provided to Expert) 51. 948's #16,28,41,42,43,44,54 (June 9 - July 24, 2003)(provided to expert) 52. Failure Items Spreadsheet 53. Fort Meade Discrimination Criteria xls Spreadsheet 54. Intrusive Results Spreadsheets from 25 Areas 55. A. Claim Summary B. (Protected Information Enclosed)Tetra Tech Claim Backup Data 56. PowerPoint Presentation : General Geophysics and Review of Ft. Meade Geophysics

3

Case 1:06-cv-00146-TCW

Document 43

Filed 12/18/2007

Page 4 of 4

Respectfully submitted, TETRA TECH EC, INC.

Date: December 18, 2007

By:

s/ William W. Thompson____ William W. Thompson, Jr. Robert D. Banfield PECKAR & ABRAMSON, PC 1133 21st Street, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 293-8815 Telephone (202) 293-7794 Facsimile Attorneys for Tetra Tech EC, Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 18th day of December 2007, a copy of the foregoing PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT LIST was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties of record by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system.

s/ William W. Thompson__

4