Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 14.5 kB
Pages: 3
Date: February 21, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 398 Words, 2,672 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/4583/136.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims ( 14.5 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:89-cv-00218-EJD

Document 136

Filed 02/21/2006

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS Consolidated Case No. 89-218 L __________________________________________ THE CHEROKEE NATION OF OKLAHOMA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) PATTON BOGGS, ) ) Plaintiff-Intervenor, ) ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________ ) __________________________________________ THE CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA, ) AND THE CHICKASAW NATION, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________ )

No. 89-218 L

Chief Judge Edward Damich

No. 89-630 L

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE MOTION TO DISMISS, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant hereby moves for an enlargement of time of seven days from February 21, 2006, to, and including, February 28, 2006, in which to file its Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. In support of this motion, defendant states as follows: 1. The Court's Opinion and Order of December 19, 2006, directed the defendant and the Cherokee Nation to file dispositive motions in response to Patton Boggs' Complaint-inIntervention or, alternatively, file Answers by February 20, 2006. Since February 20, 2006 fell

Case 1:89-cv-00218-EJD

Document 136

Filed 02/21/2006

Page 2 of 3

on a federal holiday, the responsive pleadings are due on February 21, 2006; 2. Counsel for Defendant has completed a draft of the motion to dismiss (or, in the alternative, for summary judgment) and has sent it to the Solicitor's Office for review; 3. The Solicitor's Office has not yet given Defendant's counsel its comments/suggestions; 4. The undersigned's management has suggested substantial changes in the draft; and 5. The Declaration which is to be attached to the motion cannot be finalized and signed today because the Declarant, a BIA official in Albuquerque, is out of his office today. Counsel for the Cherokee Nation, Don Simon, authorizes the undersigned to state that the CNO does not oppose this motion for enlargement. Counsel for Patton Boggs, David Panzer, authorizes the undersigned to state that Patton Boggs does not oppose this motion. This is the first request for an enlargement of time which the Defendant has made.

Dated this 21st day of February, 2006. Respectfully submitted, _s/James M. Upton JAMES M. UPTON U.S. Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Natural Resources Section P.O. Box 663 Washington, D. C. 20044-0663 Tel. (202) 305-0482 Fax: (202) 305-0506 Attorney for Defendant

2

Case 1:89-cv-00218-EJD

Document 136

Filed 02/21/2006

Page 3 of 3