Document 132
Filed 02/01/2006
Page 1 of 5
IN THE UNITED STATESCOURTOF FEDERALCLAIMS NATION OF THE CHEROKEE OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff,
*<
t
* + {. õ ,¡.
{<
Case 89-218L No. Edward Damich J. ChiefJudge
THE I.INITEDSTATESOF AMERICA, Defendant.
r l . { < { < * { . t
¡F
* ¡ß
t
PATTONBOGGSLLP,
Intervenor-Plaintiff.
V.
*
t
*
t t ¡1.
THE UNITED STATESOF AMERICA.
Defendant.
* { < t * t f i
* {. :Ë *
PATTON BOGGS' OBJECTION TO JOINT STATUS REPORT AND RESPONSE TO "JOINT MOTION TO STRIKE JOINT STATUS REPORT AND FOR LEAVE TO SUBSTITUTE CORRECTED REPORT" Patton Boggs LLP ("P8"), through counsel,hereby objects to the "Joint StatusReport" ReportAnd For to filed on January31,2006, and responds "Joint Motion To Strike Joint Status Report," filed on FebruaryI,2006, statingas follows: Corrected LeaveTo Substitute For PB's Requests InformationHave Been Ignored L On October26,2005, the Court ordered"the parties"to file a joint statusreport
on or before January 31,2006, "to inform the Court of the progressmade in carrying out the of requirements the ConsentDecree."DocketNo. 114. 2. On the sameday that the Court issuedits Order, counselfor PB sent counselfor
the governmenta letter requestingthe following information:
Case 1:89-cv-00218-EJD
Document 132
Filed 02/01/2006
Page 2 of 5
(a) How much money has been appropriatedto date to the Cherokee Nation, including sumsfor its attorneys'fees,under25 U.S.C. S 1779?; (b) How much of that total appropriationto date has been placed in the "specialholding account"for attorneys'fees?; (c) How much money from the "specialholding account"hasbeen paid to eachof the attomeys for the CherokeeNation, and when was each payment made?; (d) today?;and How much money remainsin the "special holding account"
(e) to How much more money is expected be addedto the "special holding account" from future appropriations? Memorandumin Supportof its Exhibit 13 attached Docket No. 117 (PB's Supplemental to Motion to Intervene). 3. The government's counselfailed to respond PB's October26,2005letter. Nor to
did the govemment ever provide PB the information requested. 4. confirming On December19, 2005,the Court grantedPB's Motion to Intervene,
its statusas a party. SeeDocketNo. 125. 5. 26,2005letter,on January 12,2006, Havingreceived response its October no to
counselfor PB telephonedgovernmentcounseland, again, askedwhether any additional funds had been paid out of the attomey fee escrow fund. 6. this request Receivingno response, January23,2006, counselfor PB reiterated on
hereto(1123106 email from David Panzer to to the government's counsel. SeeExhibit 1 attached DOJ's JamesUpton). 7. On January3I,2006, counselfor the govemmentleft PB's counsela voicemail
message, stating that no such additional funds had beenpaid out of the attorney escrow account. 8. That sameday, after ignoring PB's requestsfor information for months, and
having made no effort to include PB, the governmentfiled what it styled a "Joint StatusReport"
Case 1:89-cv-00218-EJD
Document 132
Filed 02/01/2006
Page 3 of 5
purportedlyon behalfof "the parties."Docket 130. Of course,this StatusReportwas not filed on behalf of all parties,as PB had no role in its preparation. SubstantiveOmissionsIn The Joint StatusReport 9. Accordingto AssistantSecretary Cason'sOctober13,2005letter, the Cherokee
Nation attorneys have beenpaid a total of $1,081,524.57. Exhibit 12 attached DocketNo. to 117 (PB's Supplemental Memorandumin Supportof its Motion to Intervene). 10. yesterday's Nonetheless, Joint StatusReport states remains that only $389,389.28
in the attorneyescrowaccount. Assumingthat $15 million had beenappropriated the for CherokeeNation and its attorneysover the last three years and that ten percent (10%) of these appropriationswere allocatedto the attomey escrow account,and given the attorney fee paymentsreflectedin Mr. Cason'sletter,thereappears be a shortfallof $29,086.29.While the to Joint StatusReportmight be readas statingthat only $14,934,831.70 beenappropriated has for the CherokeeNation and its attorneys,even if that were the case,there still appears be a to shortfall of 522,569.32. 11. From the informationavailableto PB, it is not clearwhether(a) Congress not has
appropriatedall of the funds called for in the SettlementAct, (b) the governmenthas not allocated a fulI ten percent(10%) of those funds appropriatedto the attorney escrow account,(c) the govemment has disbursedadditional funds beyond those set forth in Mr. Cason's letter (which it has statedorally is not the case),or (d) some combination of the above. Had the govemmentprovidedPB with the informationrequested its October26,2005letter, or in included PB in the preparationof yesterday'sJoint StatusReport, the Court would be fully informed on theseissuesconsistent with its October26,2005 Order. Moreover,this filing would have been urìnecessary.
Case 1:89-cv-00218-EJD
Document 132
Filed 02/01/2006
Page 4 of 5
12.
In fact, someof this very information - the amount of money appropriated
years- is provided in the Joint StatusReport for the annually for each of the relevant f,rscal Choctaw Nation and the ChickasawNation. but not for the CherokeeNation. 13. Basedon the allocationof funds between respective the Indian Nations set forth
in the SettlementAct, the sum of the funds received by the ChoctawNation and the Chicasaw Nation should equal the total sum receivedby the CherokeeNation - but that is not the case. For example,the Joint StatusReport statesthat in fiscal year 2004, the Choctaw Nation received Nation received L25 million, for a total of $5.0million. $3.75million, and the Chickasaw $ Nation had received$5.0 million in fiscal Basedon that, one would expectthat the Cherokee year 2004 as well. Nonetheless, March 2005 CherokeeNation Resolution statedthat the the for Nation had receivedonly $4.5 million out of $9.935million appropriated fiscal Cherokee year 2004. ,S¿e hereto(3115105 Cherokee Nation Resolution). The Exhibit2 affached govemment and the CherokeeNation's failure to provide this information makesit impossible for the Court to know the sourceof the shortfall in the attorney escrow account. 14. On February1,2006, the governmentand the Indian Nations filed a Joint Motion
To Strike Joint StatusReport, seekingleave to file a correctedreport basedupon undisclosed effors resulting from miscommunicationsamong counselfor those parties. No communications have been made with counselfor PB, nor have there been any efforts to include PB in this additional"j oint" filing. V/HEREFORE, PB respectfully requeststhat this Court order the United Statesto include PB in the preparationof any further Joint StatusReports,and to provide a supplementalJoint StatusReport to the Court that includesthe information outlined in paragraph2 above.
4
Case 1:89-cv-00218-EJD
Document 132
Filed 02/01/2006
Page 5 of 5
Respectfully this submitted lst dayof February,2006, PATTONBOGGS, LLP
David P. Callet David S.
GREENBER 800Connecticut Suite500 DC Washington, 20006 202-331-3100 (fax) 202-331-3101 [email protected] [email protected]
N o . 1 8 1 9 9 0) 470677) P
Case 1:89-cv-00218-EJD
Document 132-2
Filed 02/01/2006
Page 1 of 1
Panzer, DavidS. (Assoc-DC-LT)
From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: David (Assoc-DC-LT) S. Panzer, 23,200612:23PM Monday, January 'James. gov' Upton@usdoj. David (Shld-DC-LT) P. Callet, v. Cherokee US:CoFCOrder
(936 CoFC_Ord.pdf KB) u l_m, per your request, here please let discussion, out of the transferred inj unction. Best regards, David Per our intervention. Damich's order granting is a copy of,Iudge me know what Mr. Simpson says about whether any money has been of the consent the ]ifting escror¡¡ account following attorney
Case 1:89-cv-00218-EJD
0J/lã/05 TtE 13:lJ FÂI
Document 132-3
Filed 02/01/2006
Page 1 of 2
@oor
FACTSMILTE Çoversheet Charles "Chuck" Hoskin Nation District 9 Representative Cherokee 339N, Adair
vinira,oK 74301 (91 PhonelFAX 8) 256-3229
To: RalphKeenJr. FAX # 918-696-3576 Re: Anorneypayment resolution Dare:3-15-05 Pages:*L
COMMENTS:
this -including coversheet
If I can be of ñ¡rtber assistgrspleasedo nothesitaæto caIL
Case 1:89-cv-00218-EJD
vO/lO/UÐ rL'Þ l!t:¡Ð }.l-l
Document 132-3
Filed 02/01/2006
Page 2 of 2
@0 0 3
RESOLUTTON¡YO.
.1,
COUNCIL OFTHE CHEBOKEE NATION
^ RESOLUÏION A,PPN.OVINCTBE NECOÍVÍMET{DAIIOIìS QF THE OFfICE OF
GENf,RAL couNsELFoR pÀyMENT ATTonnEy ¡iùs rxor¡lrs oF ARKÁNsAs RwERSED SEnLEMEI{T rawo a.¡¡pnvrsoruziñC rxe PRI¡ICIP.AL CTTI.EFTO SUE¡/I¡T PÂYMEÌfT TUE lLA¡' rO rHE ¡URSNU Or
LIIII'TAN,ATTA|NS . PATTO¡I & SOGCS
u'HbREAs. thc Chcokee Nuion sincc time ùüremorisl å¡s errcisd fhc sovereign rightr of sclf.goyrmrnent in bch¡lf of rhe Cherokccpeeple; wTltRE^s, tho Ct¡e
iF'