Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

C A Case 3:02-cv-0176AVC Document 72 Filed O2/@2004 (EQQQ/1"5f5!1 3 M 9%+ i
’ i
w IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F! E _ l
FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT - {
2
mi FEB fa in
EASCO HAND TOOLS, INC., ) S_ ,r;·,·C,._ 2 38.
I ARMSTRONG TOOLS INC., KINGSLEY ) f;?,a}r°iQ/I/C T CO
A TOOLS INC., LEA WAY HAND TOOL ) ivil Action No. 3:02 CV 1723 (AVEG ORD, C?-UR T
CORPORATION, AND MATCO TOOLS ) nsolidated with Civil Action No. 3:02 '
CORPORATION, ) C 1747 (AVC) E
)
Plaintiffs, ) i
)
vs. )
)
( HU, HOU-FEI, a/k/a BOBBY HU, )
C ) February 13, 2004
Defendant. ) i
... PLAINTIFFS’ ASSENTED-TO MOTION i
TO DELAY DISCLOSURE DATE FOR TWO WEEKS l
Q "·~" _ 1
may PE]rsuariQtfto.Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and Local Civil Rule 9(b), plaintiffs respectfully request
¤—- 5* ¥EQ§.T:*
Hair the goudilextend by two weeks, until March 1, 2004, the date for both parties to exchange
LP
_ C; their clgn cdnstruction, infringement and invalidity information regarding 3:02 CV 1723 (AVC)
R Member Case (the "1723 action"). This request is necessitated by defendant Hu’s recently
· 6 announced decision to drop his liability claims in the original 1723 action and proceed only on i
. n-I ,
1 •'l '
B his claims in the companion 3:02 CV 1747 (AVC) action. This is the first request for extending i
. O .
u
§ , this deadline, and defendant assents to this motion, `
2: ` > .
EE % The following grounds establish good cause for granting this motion:
M 1
é A E 1. The Court’s Scheduling Order calls for the parties to exchange mutually on
0 ‘ i
2 February 16, 2004, their proposed claim constructions and information supporting their
$2 ri allegations of invalidity or infringement. (Scheduling Order attached as Exhibit A.) These
fil l
:>· ru
Q E disclosures are to be made for both the 1723 and 1747 consolidated actions. i
2 gi (
.o
cv 0
hu cn `
I
i
1