Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

( , ,_ Case 3:03-cv-00372-AVC Document 30 Filed 04/30/2004 Page 1 of 3 J
l
1
2801 APP *
I UNITED S'TATES DISTRICT COURT l-;?_=i_·i;;_-$"E`;§",?(ff i*!··j_;_n-J
1 niswnicrr on coNNEcTIcUT * f f·lCQ*§·—E‘;f,}, ’ ,
’ i
KELLY PHANEUF, :
, Plaintiff, : Civil N0. 3:03CV00372 (AVC)
i _ V. :
l ROSE MARIE CIPRIANO, DORENE M. :
F RAIKIN, KATHLEEN BINKOWSKI, :
TOWN OF PLAINVILLE and PLAHNVILLE 2
BOARD OF EDUCATION, :
i Defendants. : APRIL 28, 2004
MOTION FOR ENLARGEMEN! OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE E
MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT y
Pursuant to Federal Rules ofCivi1 Procedure 6 (b) and Local Rule 7 (b), the plaintiff
Kelly Phaneuf respectfully requests that the Court grant her an additional extension of
seventeen (17) days, within which to file her Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants’
Motion for Summary Judgment. The defendants’ motion for summary judgment was tiled i
U with this Couit on March 18, 2004. The plaintiff respectfully requests an additional seventeen j
(17) days from the current deadline of May 7, 2004, until May 24, 2004, within which to tile ,
her Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment.
ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED `
TESTIMONY NOT REQUIRED
M 7 T`—”“F‘—”·—~——»-— 44 T'“;“"“7*Tf?"@j'i??§—"?’£*§’;?;·1"—%¢i’¢?f~§§»».?f¢§»%%?eE.%;*a;¤.;¤i;*esgeiaza.=;»;¤uu.w.......`r.,i _
M ` "`T"”_**—-————e -- _"ff"”’”*`T`E??ji??‘§-*?*-€’=§·'§e?%:%?¤€2%§·€¢§+%%’a£‘§.%;*e;i,;~.¤i;*a2;.;;;gpSli “.,j,b.,,,..,.,,__: g

I , __ Case 3:03-cv-00372-AVC Document 30 Filed 04/30/2004 Page 2 of 3 {
I
I I
I -
I I
1 I
I I
I Plaintiff s counsel requests this extension because the undersigned is currently y
I involved in a continuing injunction and receivership hearing scheduled in state court, and
5 needs to complete a number of depositions with respect to that matter. Accordingly, I
plaintiff s counsel needs the additional time in order to respond to the instant motion for
I summary judgment.
This is the second motion for enlargement of time being filed by the plaintiff with
respect to the instant motion for summary judgment. Opposing counsel has been contacted
and there is no objection to this request.
I WHEREFORE, the plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant her motion for
enlargement of time. {
I THE PLAINTIFF, j
KELLY PHANEUF I
_ By: I '``’ by jg S`! gg -Q-·}§--gg: ; r\Sag gg
I Sheila]. Hanley (ct 22566) I
Gesmonde, Pietrosimone & Sgrignari, LLC.
3127 Whitney Avenue I
Q Hamden, CT 06518-2344
(203) 407—4200
I
: 2 |

\
2 l
l " ‘ Case 3:03-cv-00372-AVC Document 30 Filed 04/30/2004 Page 3 of 3
n
V = ORDER i
The foregoing motion having come before me, it is hereby ORDERED:
, GRANTED f DENIED.
Judge/Clerk
Q QERTIFICATION
This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed, via first class, postage '
prepaid, this 28"‘ day of April, 2004 to:
U James G. Williams, Esq.
Williams, Walsh & O’Connor, LLC
110 Washington Avenue, Second Floor
North Haven, CT 06473
Q Sheila J. Hanley {
.--p--_.*..,.._..~—,*MM,m.*_..__..;....*_”mm_.“.._.mm”,—m__L.,,- .... l