Free Order on Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv-OO3§RU Document 19 Filed O3/OE€OO4 Pag®$6M3qLV mOd*'iB I
\ at ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT; I _,
for the A
DISTRICT OF CONNECTIC · . A. , ,
q@iMtxi arena
ADRIANO B. BRANCO t I l l
Plaintiff, ;
: Civil No. 3:03CV376(SRU) ~ i
V. Z |
= l
SHAW’S SUPERMARKETS, INC., : FEBRUARY 26, 2004
Defendant. :
c : i
MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER i
Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7 of this Court,
the Defendant in the above-captioned matter respectfully requests a modification of the
scheclgling (order and seeks a sixty (60) day extension of time tc the scheduled dates for closure i
CD C`;‘,.·- I
.. :r::>
df dis§}·ver)%%f;:J. the dispositive motion deadline. In support of this motion, Defendant states: I
nz
‘r*"
uJ ,-.4 Eric? On April 25, 2003, the Honorable Judge Stefan R. Underhill endorsed the
'r···’
..¤ · °‘ 5
"UR-'eportcéf Pégivé Planning Meeting which set the deadlines for completing discovery to
.¤=· mm
·~ ‘ l"* arg, 20'QT4 and the filing of dispositive motions to March 1, 2004. l
2. Plaintiffs counsel cancelled three attempts by defense counsel to take l
§§ iff’ s deposition before February 1, 2004. For this reason, on January 15, 2004, Defendant
vi 1
si. "J D_ d for modification of the scheduling order to allow a thirty (30) day extension of time on i
Q ~# E
U F? very closure and a thirty day extension of time on the dispositive motion deadline. By i
- E 1
D !
· · dated Januar 16, 2004, this Court nderhill, J.) granted that motion. '
se M Y i
.Q
QJ
§ E
EEEQS 1 i
CYS U qg E [V}
85 &:~.s. ¤¤ i
¤ § E Q " I
-2*:2 a so "’l {
§ E E 2
E ZLJ?1 _=;£E-1;%:2. i§L;Yz`-_ZY;t:4=:-;L.2Y - — _ I I _ A- Q Irv TY:-1--C ij :2 Ti
_ _ r;;_E__:tié?_Y:-lg-IE;¥;=__:Y;`-r=.-FL;)-f-_·-*` I - - 7 — Q I-Ya`-T-hr-I-I Tifj ri