Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I Case 3:03-cv-OO37€SRU Document 14 Filed O1/20/20040gIBag%G I
I ‘ · ..
__) I
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I: I L D I
I ·· for the I
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I
I ZHHH JAN Ib A I0= ug I
I ; US DISi"lI.’tj?i` r:¤g;;s‘:i‘
A0R1ANo B. 1sRANco ; BRIUGEFWQ »g;;· I
I Plaintiff] : `
I : Civil N0. 3:03CV376(SRU)
. V. I I I
SHAW’S SUPERMARKETS, INC., JANUARY 15, 2004 I
I Defendant. : I
. - ` · I
MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER
L-S Pursuant t0 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7 of this Court,
ge Deéndafitg the above—captioned matter respectfully requests a modification 0f the I
. _... EBSQ _
gweduling oi?@éand seeks a thirty (30) day extension of time related to the discovery,
<\l iii A
_____ Z I--CIE}
ecificzfliy thi! ` ositive motion deadline. In support of this motion, Defendant states: {
Li?. 5 élfg I
E3 ::l>, On April 25, 2003, the Honorable Judge Stefan R. Underhill endorsed the
Report of Pa1ties' Planning Meeting which set the deadlines for completing discovery to
N\ tary 1, 2004 and the filing of dispositive motions to March 1, 2004. I
. I <
I 2. Plaintiffs counsel has been contacted and does not obj ect to this request.
% 3. Despite diligent efforts by counsel for both parties, the plaintiffs
—— I .iti0n has not been taken due to conflicts with the schedule of plaintiff and plaintiffs
`·-—“" vi
g E, =el. The proposed modification of the scheduling order, allowing a thirty (30) day extension
E
Bw ·§ ie, up to and including March 1, 2004, will enable the parties to complete the remaining
ru D I
2 é I ition and finalize discovery. Also, in accordance with the extension of time allowed for
. S .§ ·—s
sfee e I I
se%§ 1 .
G EE ¤ gi I
§§§%% I
O .2 .! ..._
E ¤ an 91
I
I
-
I-;%;;;?é:Lr;.:;5j?j?%:Lr%;%{_:_ ; I ii : i l I I
_,*>;%;;;Té___-1*Ftgijéi-i_%C;r%LHi€iil _ ri -7 2 - - I