Free Order on Motion to Strike - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

E `°¤° O` ,asCi%¤v-0027wNc Document 96 Filed 12/15/@4 Pagel 0f1
. THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU£'lgM"I° @
· DISTRICT OF CONNECTICIz%1`
Zu~!AUb`|`]Pll=O3 _
RICHARD A. MYERS, ET AL, 2 QUEZ? Sigma Y .
_ Plaintiffs, { iémtw. I j' Li; ali, if *
A I CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:03-C -00373 (RNC)
E if E TOWNSHIP OF TRUMBULL, ET AL. { C
Defendants. ' AUGUST 17, 2004
DEFENDANT WESTFIELD SHOPPINGTOWN TRUMBULL'S MOTION TO Y
STRIKE EXHIBITS SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFFS IN RESPONSE TO
i · DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
The defendant Westfield Shoppingtown Trumbull hereby moves to strike
Exhibits A through F and Exhibit L attached to Plaintiffs' Local Rule 56(a)(2) I
l Statement filed in response to Westfield Shoppingtown Trumbull's Motion for _ ”
Summary Judgment dated June 15, 2004. As set forth herein and in the memorandmn »
l December 14,, 2004. Myers iv. Igwnship gi Trgggull _
1. _3:O3CVOO373 (RNC? 0 y y j
I Re: Defendant Westfield Shoppingtown~Trumbull 's Motion to Strike Exhibits
Submitted by Plaintfiffs in Response to Defendant-'s Motion for Summary
Judgment (Doc. # 93)
i Denied. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c) and (e) clearly contemplates
{ that deposition transcripts may be submitted to support or oppose a motion
e for summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 (c) , (e); Qelgtex Qgrp. v.
[ catrett, `477 U.s._ 317, 323-24 (1986);
i 587 F. Supp .2142Ig, 1426 (E.D.N.Y. 1984) . The court declines to strike
L l these exhib' s To the extent that the contents of the exhibits
are noQ>as§ ompersonal knowledge, contain hearsay, or are otherwise
5 inadmi 'bl , thecéourt will disregard those portions in considering
P defen s' gqotfdglxfor summary judgment., gouging rlgg, Ing ,wv. gggngr,
No. O ’v. *:1225 K) (JCF), 2004.WL 2101900, at *4-5 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 15,
= 2004) .LL""'s¤ <§ae¤§&,
[ N l"-T; i Ei ,,t— E
[Er Robert *a C atign , .S.D.J.