Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 59.5 kB
Pages: 3
Date: February 2, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 414 Words, 2,574 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22495/33.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 59.5 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
W, .`..... X-- ,,_n,4.. _.....T?n,.,,_, ...._?........,,,__l.I...____ ___ _ `
·· — Case 3:03-cv—5Q§378—DJS Document 33 Filed O2/O2/2004 Page 1 of 3 I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT " J'? :'.`Q‘
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT `J “ ` “ ’ ·‘ '
Mil - $.:2 2; tg i,
DONNA OWEN " "‘
Plaintiff, -(3[V[L ACTIQN N0? 1, rm-- {,,3,.;
- 3:03 CV 378 (DJS) YY.°*·$”?:`"i`é*’*P§f.itil. ij?] M
V. `
GEORGIA PACIFIC January 30, 2004 "
Defendant.
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ¥
JUDGMENT AND FOR THE PRE-TRIAL MEMO I
Plaintiff moves for an extension of time to respond to defendant’s Motion for =
Summary Judgment from February 1, 2004 to February 24, 2004 due to plaintiff {
counsel’s heavy case load, plaintiffs vacation, and the voluminous size of {
I
defendant’s Summary Judgment Motion papers. ·
Plaintiff also moves for an extension of time for the filing of the pre-trial
memo from February 5, 2004 to March 4, 2004 due to plaintiff counse1’s heavy case
load and his working on the response to defendant’s Summary Judgment Motion
Defense counsel has been contacted and he has no objection to either of the
two Motions.
This is plaintiffs first request for an extension on both deadlines.
With regard to the parties contacting the court this week to arrange for a
case management conference call with the court on the status of the case, plaintiffs
counsel contacted defense counsel in that regard but defense counsel was out of the

!*T.""S*' ‘ · " ""‘ "‘“""" ""' "“""

l ( Case 3:03-cv-Q03)78-DJS Document 33 Filed O2/S2/2004 Page 2 of 3 i
’ N
5 office. Both parties’ counsel will contact the court early this coming week to {
3.I‘I‘3.I1gB f01` tl1€ 02158 I'I1ElI'1Ei.g6II1BI1l3 COI1f€I'BI’lC9 Call. K
THE PLAINTIFF:
‘ DONNA OWEN
,4/ /%#
By:
Stephen P. Horner, Esquire
2183 Boston Post Road I
Darien, Connecticut 06820 _
Federal Bar Number: ct 02460 `
(203) 655-7905 N
5
l
l
Q
- 2 .. l

%
1
l

J , ~ case 3:03-cv—?O3]78—DJS Document 33 Filed Q.2!`32/2004 Page 3 of 3
i CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE i
I I hereby certify that a true copy of the forgoing was sent via first class mail,
N postage prepaid on January 30, 2004 to:
Richard D. Haygood, Esq. `
Kilpatrick Stockton LLP `
3737 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 400
Raleigh, North Carolina 27512
Stephen P. Horner i
- 3 - I