Free Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

._ Case 3:03-cv-OOBEDJS Document 29 Filed O1/`&%OO4 Page 1 of 3
` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I
I
FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
DONNA WEN I, ·"’
O ) I
I I_I A @ -ai"I I
Plaintiff, ) CIVIL °f§’o. I
V g 3:03 CI/'§__iI2§;$DJ§_)) wm 5
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION ) g·>!cC;;g_ *9 I
) ‘“` at Y
Defendant. ) January 12, 2004
I
I
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT I
Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant
Georgia—Pacific Corporation ("Georgia—Pacific" or "Defendant"), hereby moves the
Court to grant summary judgment as to all counts of Plaintiffs Complaint. The
undisputed material facts, which are set forth in the accompanying Local Rule 56(a)1
Statement, reveal that Defendant is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.
In support of this Motion, Defendant submits the accompanying Memorandum
of Law.
ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

I

{ ` Case 3:03-cv—OO3K8>DJS Document 29 Filed O1/t%OO4 Page 2 of 3 {
l
M l
Respectfully submitted this [Q day of J anuary, 2004. I
KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP
n Rjdalg jfvrain (CT247l7)
Richard D. I-Iaygood (CT2471S)
3737 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 400 W
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
Telephone: 919.420.1700
Facsimile: 919.420.18OO
Gregory B. Nokes (CT06095)
MCCARTER & ENGLISH
City Place 1
185 Asylum Street
Hartford, Connecticut 06103-3495 E
Attomeys for Defendant,
Georgia-Pacific Corporation 1
l
l
1
I
2 E

__ ‘ Case 3:03-cv—OO3{8—\DJS Document 29 Filed O1/t{2>?OO4 Page 3 of 3
emmrimirm or sinzvicrz
This is to certify that I have this date served the within and foregoing ‘
Def`endant’s Motion for Summary Judgment by depositing a true and correct copy of
same in the United States mail with adequate first-class postage affixed thereon,
I
addressed as follows: i
a
Stephen P. Horner, Esq.
Law Office of Stephen P. Horner
2183 Boston Post Road E
Darien, Connecticut 06820
_ T M
This 2 day of January, 2004.
J
G go .Nokes
HARTFORD: 606266.0l
m
l

P
3 l