Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv—OO3 -DJS Document 22 Filed 10/1 OO3 Page 1 of 1
I
t?"ll....ElZ) i
· » UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT mm Um ,8 in lg; 51
_ _ DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT $5 [MSW l C.}, Cwm.
§ ’ _,I*.»,R`l FORD Ll I
PE DONNA OWEN, ) I
0 ) I
M Plaintiff ) CIVIL ACTION NO. {
'_§_‘ ) 3:03 CV 378 (DIS)
*~’ v. ) I
>»
> I
S GEORGIA PACIFIC, ) q
an ) I
E Defendant. ) October 8, 2003 l
*5;
e , . .
2 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH T0 g
JJ RESPOND AND/OR OBJECT TO PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY I
2 A i
Z Pursuant to Local Rule 9(b), Defendant Georgia Pacific hereby requests a thirty (30)
-‘” I ‘’I’ E Ia;
'E M extension of time, up to and including November 14, 2003, to respond and/or obj ect to
In _ iz-
ag , Plaintifi`?_sI-E-irst Request for Production of Documents. In support of this Motion, Defendant
if i I I ll
rg U ‘ states the following:
FI =" H Y . js I
rg , - · II; lf. `" i No previous extension of time to respond to discovery has been requested.
an a I I
.¤ . y
3 2. Given the breadth ofthe requested discovery and the conflicting schedules of
fil counsel and Defendant’s personnel, Defendant requires additional time to assemble
JJ ?
O , information to respond to Plaintiff s request. l
: \ all
dl . 3. Plaintiff s counsel, Attorney Stephen P. Horner, has indicated that he has no
g . ` objection to the granting of this Motion.
I UJ
Z l I : O
:. i if i ,
QJ .l
¤\ ‘ l
N ` ‘ ‘1 l
y I " I
Z O
O i e i
.~.».` Q ;~.·. _ r__A 4 I
gl .. . , .... i
I
L)- 7 .7 r` 7 -7 _ _ ; _ir M r- `- "1_kX{¢-fi-a—E 1; 7; if aft


in _ I- VL-N - J i K _ Y`- 17 `-7 ir `-'k:t_;§i¥:—-at in _;- if E;+