Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

i ` t. · Case 3:03-cv-00400-CFD Document 28 _ Filed OiEE—0gli;—;Ee(g5z>1v»ot;3.lql.;t¤»\l;·.;
. A O O i ` l
i UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT i
i SAMUEL BOWENS : NO.
l vs. E S} JY er
i MARK STRANGE, ET AL. JANUARY It y
` MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
\ WHICH TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEAQDINGQ i
· i The defendants in the above-captioned matter respectfully move this Court for a thirty- i
’ I day extension of time within which to tile a pleading responsive to the plaintiff’ s complaint, up [
i to and including February ll, 2004. In support of this motion, the defendants represent as
A i follows: -
1. On November 3, 2003, the defendants in this matter moved for Security for Costs
A - in the amount of $500.00. On November 10, 2003, this Court granted the motion, ordering the
i plaintiff to provide security for costs in the amount of $500.00. Since that time, the plaintiff has
I failed to post such a security. On December 23, 2003, the defendants moved for summary
l dismissal, which motion is currently pending before this Court. In addition this Court has issued ,
an Order To Show Cause by January 30, 2004 as to why the defendants’ Motion For Summary
dismissal should not be granted. It would be preferable to have the Motion for Summary
Dismissal resolved before the parties spend time and resources addressing this matter further.
2. This is the third motion for an extension of time to tile a responsive pleading
I since the Court’s ruling on defendants’ Motion for a More Definite Statement, but the first
; motion for an extension of time since the Motion for Summary Dismissal was tiled.
. I
l

I
if. `iii - - __.. ;_;;;p;_;;
__ as _gg__

I " I Case 3:03-cv-OO400;QFD Document 28 Filed O1/15/2094 Page 2 of 2. - I
. 1 J" .
, C ____, 2 U
_ 3. The undersigned counsel attempted to contact plaintiffs counsel in order to
. I
determine plaintiffs position on this matter, and plaintiffs counsel informed that he had no
I objection to the motion. ·
!
DEFENDANTS,
Mark Strange, et al.
. I RICHARD BLUMENTHAL
I ATTORNEY GENERAL
I BY: " ,~
I Lynn D. itte rink
I Assistant Atto y General
Federal Bar No. ct08575
110 Sherman Street .
Hartford, CT 06105
I Telephone No. (860) 808-5450
Fax No. (860) 808—5591
‘ E-mail: [email protected]@po.state.ct.us
CERTIFICATION
I I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent by first-class mail, postage prepaid
' to the following on this 14th day of January, 2004: I
. I John R. Williams, Esq. · I
_ Williams and Pattis, LLC
Z- 51 Elm Street, Suite 409
I New Haven, CT 06510
I
I `I I _ · I
I n Wittenbnnk I
I Assistant Attorney General
I
- I
I
I
,,... .