Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

RTC
I Case 3:03-cv-00400-CFD Document 23 Filed 11/25/2003 P(_égeU1»'@bffIl(-JU 0’t>L-Im_t I
I ` UNITED STATES DISTRICT 3- J; -5 _.·E\ gg; ng, I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I
Y ..L]Z:` ·Q£i}!._S.*l`£` I
It {Ki i°C€;?Ii3 CII — I
SAMUEL BOWENS : NO. 3 y2CVOO400(CFD) QL
= 02) .
VS. :
· I
MARK STRANGE, ET AL. : NOVEMBER 2003 I
MOTION FOR EXTENSIONQF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE RESPONSIVE I
PLEADING I
.. I ` The;def`endants in the above—captioned matter respectfully move this Court for a thirty- -
sr; { " I
»-I day extension of time within which to file a pleading responsive to the plaintiff s complaint, up I
in In-I . . _ I
I IIYÂ¥o and including December 12, 2003. In support of this motion, the defendants represent as I
. I _i I I- ll I
5 [ Qfollows:
*" t *··· A -
I- ’ Yi xg . . . . . . . .
Im, _ r y .3 l. This IS the first motion for an extension of time to file a responsive pleading SIHCC
iifiié fj? I `·i·I t-·` I
If-I; L; _ i this Court’s ruling on the defendants’ motion for a more definite statement;
j I ` ei 2. The undersigned counsel is attempting to attend to numerous cases at this point in
I I I
I I time, making more timely response most difficult; `
3. The undersigned counsel will be out of town next week to visit an ill family I
member; and
4. The undersigned counsel attempted to contact plaintiffs counsel in order to
determine plaintiff" s position on this matter, and left a message, but has not yet heard back from
him.
I
I
I