Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Fame. _ - l ,,.. ( n
i Case 3:03-cv-0040 FD Document 25 Filed 12/23.¢%OW'{¤Ed@#l&eHi?"/¢¢'5° , MW { l
i "?- cit.! ]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT _ ‘_ __ 4 _ _
_ p DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT A S ` ’ E
in 'ti*·= Yi? ’=i iii- i
` F SAMUEL BOWENS 2 NO. 3g02CV00400(CFD) `"'` I *
vs. Q
1* MARK STRANGE, ET AL. DECEMBER 9, 2003 i
l
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE RESPONSIVE
PLEADING l
|E -4 The defendants in the above—captioned matter respectfully move this Court for a thirty- i
fi? vi day e(§t;tenSioh,_9f time Within which to file a pleading responsive to the plaintiffs complaint, up
E [ I5 ii.? ·`·· “ .
iiilij § to arid—including January ll, 2003. In support of this motion, the defendants represent as l
lll? ig i {fl Q A YYY q
E A E Ti 1. Q ·i This is the second motion for an extension of time to file a responsive pleading
eign Q, E—-LJ _ , t
.»l· ' ·
ii: E § since this Court’s ruling on the defendants’ motion for a more definite statement;
tit A * E
I ; O 2. The tmdersigned counsel is attempting to attend to numerous cases at this point in *
i `l E
l 5 >
{ time, making more timely response most difficult. In addition, she has been traveling a good
A `A portion of the last month due to the illness and death of a family member; and i
I l
[ 3. The undersigned counsel attempted to contact plaintiffs counsel in order to l
l i determine plaintiffs position on this matter, and left a message, but has not yet heard back from
i him. I l
l
li l
“ l
I . I l
l · l
i F
*“‘“*·*’ " _“’**"·‘*’·*‘*#°’?*w>$·i<=i¤·2¤¢*¢¤1#2¢>ze»·rtz¤:1¢:>¤·t-:s¢t.·e>wA··<=<·*~*·~'* *'*‘ ·me·¤»m·1:rc