Free Scheduling Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv-00933-WIG

Document 12

Filed 04/27/2005

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT SAMMIE GOSS, O/B/O SHADOW & MAYNARD, Plaintiff, v. STRATFORD HOUSING AUTHORITY, and EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR STEVE NACANO, : : : No. 3:03CV0933(WIG) :

Defendants. : --------------------------------------X SCHEDULING ORDER Recognizing the need to have a scheduling order in place so that this case can proceed, whether Plaintiff proceeds with counsel or pro se, the Court hereby orders: Defendants are directed to file an answer or to otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. Given the Plaintiff's Complaint, Defendants

may answer in narrative form, as opposed to setting forth numbered paragraphs, without prejudice to later amendment or the filing of a dispositive motion on the pleadings. Upon review of

Defendants' response, the Court will further address scheduling. SO ORDERED, this 27th day of April, 2005, at Bridgeport, Connecticut.

/s/ William I. Garfinkel WILLIAM I. GARFINKEL, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE