Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 53.5 kB
Pages: 1
Date: February 3, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 360 Words, 2,333 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22875/65.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 53.5 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
i Case 3:03-cv-00945-CFD Document 65 Filed O2/O2/20.04%"F"aE]E·’il€atvi¥;y, muck
I EI'$<, °\ ‘*
i , ._ J \. _/ JU A W
p ‘ "’ ILL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Drsraicr or connscrrcur
CLARENCE R. COLLINS, JR., et : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:03-cv-945 (CFD) {
al., for themselves and on behalf of a : .
class of similarly situated property :
0W1'1€1'S, ;
, Piamarrs, Q A
V. :
OLIN CORPORATION and the ·
TOWN OF HAMDEN, :
. §` _D i
(E ` __ ix; Defendants, ; JANUARY 12, 2004 ,
E, fl!} >—-
\ It Q"' cm
E MOTION ON CONSENT TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
ra <"~J .:1; —~ i
_, ____ J Aj- ··..- Y; ia., P
-—»s · gjurséigtgiiitfto Federal Rules of Civil Procedure l6(b) and Local Rules 7(b) and 26(e), the
¤ "` -- -·- "fj iisii .‘·. ?
\. 3 Deferrglant Iliovifii of Hamden, on the consent of all parties, hereby moves for an order modifying _
Q we Scheduling Order, dated July 14, 2003 (Exh1b1t "A"), approved by the court in this action on R
<
v 3 October 14, 2003. In particular, Movant respectfully requests that the court approve the
I
$ \ ‘proposed First Modified Scheduling Order, which relates to the deadlines for discovery and l
w qlotions gegarding the issues of sovereign immunity and successor liability, and class
_ Lr)
certification. {grounds for support of this Motion, Movant states the following:
rg l. Q.,} panics are diligently working to gather the necessary information to comply with
.”.' l` F E- -. 3,, F.
fthe July? Scheduling Order. Given the number of parties and the time periods involved,
however, itfisnliiw apparent that the schedule which had been agreed to by the parties was overly
optimistic. In addition, the pending Motions to Dismiss may substantially affect some of the
gg; ;°T§t‘;igt?2;;¤"° HALLORAN Phone (ssc) 522-6103
Y ` ·ax 4 ··
Hartford,C1` amos gl SAGE LLP iaris(§’0(i)2Iis1Iii)0O6
. --. . L _ . L . - ............... . W - _, _- -» — -i A- » A.
Q}? II`”ii;tI”?’
I `77' ‘ ‘-*- V . ..- I II II °I' I’I'I'·':I'—‘E·-~i<-2£·;>i.>4}:e · r- Y —·· “ —`. I --7 II II I I II II I I -I -I>IIk)III