Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 50.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: January 5, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 481 Words, 3,330 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22888/25.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 50.3 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
I 7777-—_ I 77+*1-;-M_" '“ *"" ';
l g Case 3:03-cv-00958-MRK Document 25 Filed O1/05/2004 Page 1 of 2
i UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ___ '
msriucr or coiwncrrcur gi? § lm l_;_
‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘“‘‘‘‘‘""‘‘‘“*‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘·‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘"**··‘"··· X Q
coNArs CORPORATION, ; lm 5 5*: lil slit P
: Civil Action No. 303 0953
l Plaintifi ; U ;i.__r a C_;j_~_e g gg :A·- I ·
i . ttl in llr`#"·“= ~l· ""**° l' l
i v. : N
EURASIA CONCEPTS, INC. : J
d.b.a. BIO IONIC, INC., : ‘ I
* Defendant. :
l ··‘······“····*"·········· l *···········~···········~··· X l
l . I
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME T0 ANSWER ]
DEFENDANT’S DISCOVERY REQUESTS I
AND ORDER THEREON i
Plaintiff Conair Corporation (hereinafter "Conair”) moves the Court for an extension of
time to answer Defendant’s outstanding discovery requests until January l3, 2004. In support of . _
its motion, Plaintiff states as follows:
l. Plaintiffs responses to Defendant’s discovery requests are due today, December 29, l
2003. I i
I 2. Plaintiff attempted to contact counsel for Defendant to seek a two week extension to K
answer the discovery requests, however, there was no answer at counsel’s office. It appears that I
1
there may be a problem with the phone line of counsel for Defendant as the phone repeatedly
rang and no voicemail or other answering machine picked up.
l
3. Plaintiff seeks an extension of time because counsel for Plaintiff recently had surgery p
on his right wrist after a slip and fall accident earlier this month and is tmable to write or handle l
documents and, as a result, counsel for Plaintiff was delayed in working on the responses. I
4. Plaintiff hereby moves the Court for an extension of time until January 13, 2003 to
answer the Defendant’s discovery requests. i
l

l
· i Case 3:03-cv-00958-MRK Document 25 Filed O1/05/2004 Page 2 of 2 i
l
5. This motion is being made for good cause and not for purposes of delay. I
Dated: December 29, 2003 Respectfully submitted, X
l
Anthony H. Handal (Ct Fed. # 03837)
Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, LLP
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10022
212-536-3900 ph l
212-536-3901 fax ·
Attorneys for Plaintiff
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Dated: l
u.s.o.J. l
` CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE |
I I I, Catherine R. Keenan, an associate with Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, LLP, counsel for Plaintiff, .
Conair Corporation, hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Plaintiff’ s Motion for an Extension of
_ time to answer Defendant’s discovery requests and Order Thereon was served today, December 29, 2003, . i
upon all parties by placing a copy of same in first class mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: I
Brian T. Foley, Esq.
McGovern & Associates
. One Lafayette Place
Greenwich, CT 06830 p
l
Dated: December 29, 2003 B . ‘ [gr if @,0; gc E
Catherine R. Keenan I