- Case 3:03-cv-00957-%NE Document 15 Filed O4/29/2004 Page 1 of 1 §
,I ., - I
i tk UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUF i Em E D
JERMAINE MURRAY, I yi APH 2 b A_ q= 22
etitioner, : VIL ,,. I ENT 5UtG ‘ E) I
P Q? ,,,,5% "’§""i»@ `
, BHIDGIEPORT. Ctltlii 4»<»Q./ g
: V. I p
_ JOHN ASHCROFT, et al., :
I I
_ Respondents. : April 14, 2004 I
r .
ii RESPONDENTS’ SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME I
,. § N UNC PRO TUNC I
s .
‘ Z
1 QI Vg Respondents, John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, and Eduardo
•§¤ 'Ti I
N Eg l Ci jAguirre, Acting Director of the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services} through I
(IJ I-I I
. ,4; ,
g gundersigned counsel, hereby respectfully request, nunc pro tune, an extension of time up to and 1
*6 3
I ·-.. 2 including May 17, 2004, to submit a substantive response to the habeas petition tiled in this case. p
i In support of this motion, Respondents state as follows:
On February 4, 2004, this Court denied the Respondents’ motion to dismiss or transfer I
I
the habeas petition to the Eastern District of Louisiana on jurisdictional and venue grounds. In
that ruling, the Court ordered Respondents to file a substantive response to the claims made in
the habeas petition on or before March 28, 2004. Respondents previously sought and the Court
granted an extension of time until April 13, 2004, to respond to the substantive arguments in the
Oniylgch 1, 2003, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS") was abolished I
and its @nct@§transferred to three bureaus within the Department of Homeland Security
@suan,;{to tl’{§_Eomela1id Security Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135, 2178. The
gjorcerynt 15:i*r@ions of INS were transferred to the Bureau of Immigration and Customs
Errgorcensent @LCE") while its service functions were transferred to the Bureau of Citizenship i
anel·Imn@rati'?•'i1@e1·vices ("BCIS"). A I
“‘ s At I
I
I
-
-. , -_ ,. .. - I J.;;;;1i -5 . . .. . ..._...
iii i 1 ra ·-
i ‘ r`