Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 59.1 kB
Pages: 1
Date: April 1, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 365 Words, 2,171 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22887/13.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 59.1 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
..,., W, ...-_ .....
. . · Case 3:03-cv-009?5WWE Document 13 Filed 04605/2004 Page 1 of 1 I
I UNITED srrxrss nrsrsrcr couar F I L § D I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT mm. MAH 30 FD 2: zu I
JERMAINE MURRAY = u.s.uzsrs1cr cousr I
BRtUGt.PORT.C0t·1N I
Petitioner, 1 CIVIL NO. 3 )
v. : if
JOHN ASHCROFT, et al., : (
C`I` If i
Respondents. : March 30, 2004 I
RESPON])ENTS’ MOTION FOR Eg TENSION OF TIME
N UNC PRO T UNC
I
J Riéspontgiegs, John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, and Eduardo I
{Q IDI I
QI P@·re, éctin ector of the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services} through I
LLB 2¤=
EI uridgsignb-d conégl, hereby respectfully request, mmc pro func, an extension of time up to and
¤~» . "" . ‘£ . BE . . I
rnuadrng gpm] d·§g004, to submit a substantive response to the habeas petition filed in this
U g Z9
§I case. In support of this motion, Respondents state as follows: I
S
- On February 4, 2004, this Court denied the Res ondents’ motion to dismiss or transfer ` I
2}* p
the habeas etition to the Eastern District of Louisiana on 'uris dictional and venue rounds. In
P J E I
" that ruling, the Court ordered Respondents to file a substantive response to the claims made in
M z
. "‘ TP l
f" She habeas petition on or before March 28, 2004. Undersigned counsel first became aware of this I
C l *·¤.
Tgflhruling and the Cou1t’s order to show cause, on March 29, 2004, after 5:00 p.m., while reviewing
wg Maj I
I e
’ 1 On March 1, 2003, the Immi ration and Naturalization Service "INS") was abolished
_ 1 S
I d its functions transferred to three bureaus within the Department of Homeland Security
. E rsuant to the Homeland Securit Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135, 2178. The I
. y . . I
E F forcement functions of INS were transferred to the Bureau of Immigration and Customs
°” §1forcement "BICE" while its service functions were transferred to the Bureau of Citizenship
t D . . . e
d Immigration Services "BCIS" .
zag
I I
·(
'R
_` YE"-


i`_—"_l`__ v_--’—é-’—rr