Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

1 N **;·———~—
1 Case 3:03-cv-00986-.lCH Document 36 Filed O3/26/2004 Page 1 of 1
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTF I L E D
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
201111 MAR 21-I A |0= I `I
j U.$.D1STR1CT C01ll1§`11I 1
1 SUSAN E. WOOD, ) CIVIL ACTION‘1NlO1GEPU iT' CU ‘
. ) 3:03-CV—986 (] CH) {1 1
1 piaimrrr, ) j 1
’ v. j 1
1 > 1
1 1 1
1 SEMPRA ENERGY TRADING ) March 23, 2004
1 CORPORATION, ) 1
. ) _
1 Defendant. ) 1
) .
1 ""
· U'} p...
1 .5*-DEE¤Ep DANT’S MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF DISPOSITIVE MOTION 1
Q (I Ejii DEADLINE
1 M ..¤ * ‘ rc as 1
1 ::5 N Fil] fendant, Sempra Energy Trading Corp. ( Sempra ), respectfully moves the Court to 1
¤-7 ET? ‘: .
IL existing dispositive motion deadline in this case, as follows: 1
§ QEQE
Event Deadline
Dispositive Motions due _ May 14, 2004
1 1` l There is good cause to grant this motion, insofar as Plaintiff recently moved for an
_ extension of the discovery end-date in this case from March 19, 2004 to May 3, 2004. The 1
requested extension is therefore necessary so that Defendant will have an adequate amount of 1
s time to prepare a summary judgment motion subsequent to the close of discovery. 1
vi I
1 Du Plaintiffs counsel, Brendan O’Rourke, Esq., objects to this motion. 1
F,
m 1
1 .2: *1
,5 16*
.-2 ”°'1 1
E lé § ¤% .
§ 3 tg E Q ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED
O E ZE Q D TESTIMONY NOT REQUIRED
E § §¤°l\
O .2 E Q
E D D m 1
Zif;—f?»2‘;1’.*a2;;r·e:·;:..p...é-.=;...?T ` 1 " "’”' `* ’"l”’·`"`·` V? *‘ ? i‘ #{+-4;
Le; sap ie L- ».».,.,T I
rflrjrjgiir EY?’s?*.i'a¥i »*. 552 _. r _ i _
-_ ir)?;;;r I-- -;;:- :;4;_:;i rr- Timzi VEL;-I T} ir? D ;Z;;;-$*-5-T_:;:‘r2.s—._1;;¤:;_E;_E.:é._;,._ _a_ _ i
,,_£%;__ , ,_,_,