Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

. .44»———-—»——.—.-----—......_... ..._.....
I Case 3:03-cv-00986-JCH Document 34 Filed O3/24/2004 Page 1 of 1
I gg · -- . ..as..:;r;·.;.w..;: 1·-»
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT F I I. E D I
ZIIIIII MAI-? IQ ID I2= 58
SUSAN E. WOOD, CIVIL AC IIIIJI QOURT
3:02-cv-as 3 figmtti I
Piamurr; T9 I
v. I
SEMPRA ENERGY TRADING
CORPORATION, March 19, 2004 I
Defendant.
MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
r- _ _ I
it gggpintiff Susan Wood (“Plaint1ft") hereby moves to Modify the Scheduling Order in the i
csi ;-me I
“” (DC.} I
[3bove,‘g_&@tioned case. The Scheduling Order in this case currently provides a discovery cutoff I
Um:
3 vnu.
$ Gate §@arch 19, 2004. However, based upon the fact that the depositions of a number of I
2} m ' I
-==•: 5*-9
§$ gployyggs of Defendant Sempra ("Sempra") had to be rescheduled, which fact has been
E 3 E
communicated to the Court, good cause exists to extend the discovery cutoff date to May 3, I
2004.
This is a request that is reasonably made, as this requested short extension will allow
Plaintiff to complete the deposition of six (6) Sempra employees. Further, the Court has been I
"* I
I made aware of the need for such modification by Plaintiffs response to Sempra's Motion to
;;j I
·` p postpone the deposition of Sempra's employees due to Defendants counsel, Peter Schultz's wife's
jg pregnancy, and the ultimate birth of their new child. I
3 I
·§ Tg Further, the depositions of several Sempra employees are currently scheduled to take I
"G O I
‘ ta ‘¤ gx . . , J
E .3 Q E8`. place in month of April. More particularly, Sempra employees Vin Cookingham, Denise Freda,
O as
Grams I
s S
*6 Q PU '
E cn rn m
I