Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I
I Case 3:03-cv-00986-JCH Document 24 Filed O1/O?§OO4 Page 1 of 1
I I - . K ____ {_
I QZIZI/?”E’£ {df.?
I - UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT . I . I ’. I `
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
I . lfflfl fl I |jT?§: I () I
I SUSAN E. WOOD, _&I¢@\/IL ACTION NO, I
I ` 3:03—CV—986 (ICH) I ‘ =
Plaintiff -
I — against —
I SEMPRA ENERGY TRADING I
I CORPORATION, December 30, 2003 I
I Defendant. I
I DEFENDANT’S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO I
_ ‘ PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF DISCOVERY RE UESTS I
I Pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7(b), Defendant hereby moves for a nine (9) I
day extension of time, up to and including I anuary 9, 2004, within which to serve its responses to
I Plaintiffs First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents. Defendant `
2 requests this extension in order to gather information required to address each of Plaintiffs I
I · discovery requests. Despite diligent efforts, Defendant has been unable to complete its responses I
I to Plaintgf s discovery requests, primarily as a result of the winter holidays and the vacation
·· as
F ggeduleihof witnesses.
\` [L c.,.> l--
I Lu (gn De r 30, 2003, Plaintiffs counsel, Brendan O’Rourke, consented to the
i ' E oa I
( QUGSIQGXIQQT of time. This is Defendant’s second request to extend the time within which I
§ resp§ to gflfltiff s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents. E
• * · L ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED I
- ;j TESTIMONY NOT REQUIRED *
E :·· I
E ° I
2 % I

%}$E§?;;;%;i¥E—i%$1·;i;i·2;— ;:w-e,s¢;a_.s_... ;____;;_ ;;;i£`J__ lt ` iéitii ll _ -
I _ _ _, _ %_—_—_F";? r` ` ‘ I rt P
%?i%2§.E;t2£i;i¥i£?£i·;‘£·;i2$·a—:.&-E-v.¥a_-.s_.iT _ _ """ ’···»* ——==;-LVALLT;
A ii :?:5; ` Jp _ Q- ` LLT_%_ K _ _