Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

1
Case 3:03-cv—OO988—RNC Document 36 Filed 07/12/2004 Page 1 of 1
al ‘ ° 1
1 ` " O L) 1
1 1
P8 1 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1
U FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
2 1
Q EILEEN STOEHR, ET AL.,
I,1 plaintiftj :
KI-·|
O _ VS. : Civil No.: 303CV00988 (RNC)
c:
o
UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION : JULY 12, 2004
5 Defendant. : 1
J-J
>< 1
(I) 1
B FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME `
11 1
3 Plaintiffs move for an extension of time to and including August 16, 2004 within which 1
O C
1% *3 to file their papers in opposition to the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment dated June 1
E t' . 1
1; SE1 *7; 2004 and received by plaintiff s counsel on or about June 19.
.::2 O Q 1
11 U3 The reasons for this motion are that plaintiff s counsel has been continuously on trial
IU rf •
GJ
Ex ` e June l5 and requires additional time to prepare responsive papers. In addition the parties
T1 o ¤ 1
a .1 _ _ I
‘D agive had some settlement discussions, wh1ch are ongomg. 1
*111 1: 1
§ U This is the first request for an extension relating to this motion. 1
m ‘ - 1
Q Z i Counsel has attempted to contact counsel for the defendant to determine whether the
El H iff; 1....;
g mendiaiit consents to the granting of this motion but thus far has been tmable to do so. 1
U rg ucd _ji_L‘ 1- ji gh) .
. g 1 · ,3 fl. 11
rg .p_ ‘ 1 Q {ig 11·. yi THE PLAINTIFFS
IE '1 1 )_A_1 1 i
Q .4 “ 1-;;; r ‘_ 1
U -23 1 1 1 1/lgvi 1
· EL `1 1 By;........
g 11] David N. Rosen
3 1,%* 400 Orange Street }
cg, FO New Haven, Connecticut 06511
X '1” (203) vs?-3513 1
gi CT00l96
'§_l {QZ} E-mail: d1·[email protected]
•·: 1·»1 1
1
1

$--4 L..;_,;_ _;r;;___L Ln; _ i _; _; _; 7;* “:_'ri} -_-( V4.-_Li;u; S; ua ir - 71`_;.'1n;-lGT`J'r`)'h>j`r"·°`-’—"'¥°"i¤“*.¤-¤-,a¤.¤_;¢;