Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

. ,_ Case 3:03-cv-00988-RNC Document 34 Filed 07/09/2004 Page 1 of 1
I ( j) iii? El j Fi?
. jj t at
l { Ztili Jil -2 A l0= 08
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ·; ·:; £`”{j3,}"l‘;l{j`i` g;jQ[_l§§`{
, ‘ " `- I gr v-, {vi"
4.. - I. J. tum l.; 1.
, DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
I EILEEN STOEHR and FREDERICK )
I STOEHR )
Plaintiffs, ) CIVIL ACTION NO. /
l v. ) 303C\/00988 (RNC) j"`
) Zi
I UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION ) 5
J > l
Defendant. ) July 2, 2004 E}
P PARTIES’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ·’
I Plaintiffs, Eileen Stoehr and Frederick Stoehr, by their attorney, and defendant, United {
i Industries Corporation, by its attorneys, move for an extension of time of the deadlines set forth .
I
in the Case Management Order. Pursuant to the parties’ June I, 2004 telephone conference with I
. Judge Chatigny regarding the plaintiffs’ Motion Nunc Pro Tunc For Permission to Produce
I Portions of Expert Report Out of Time and for Further Reliei the original Case Management
Order was previously modified as follows:
I June 4, 2004 ~— deadline for plaintiffs’ expert disclosure;
L-I-.f "\f\{\A Jll.11i.,.». .1 1 · .·r•r•·• .
Luly 8, 2004. Eileen Stoebr, et al. V. United Industries Corporation
3 3:03CV988 (RNC)
Rei: Parties' Motion for Extension of Time [doc . 33]
Granted. Counsel are hereby advised that disclosure and depositions of
detendant’s liability experts may be postponed until after a rulipg on the
preemption issue raised by defendant' s recently filed motion for sii11mna_i_;%_%
judgment but only i f granting the summary judgment motion will; di spose ' the
entire case. So ordered. il pig}, 'T
,· I in OO E. _ ._
:*-2 ;.:\ ·U
. J it Ilj
. · ·r ip; Sit W
Roldert N. Cfnatigny, U.S.D.J. ' {_1 i E
*` _ ‘ 1
W- 3. -l l I l ni
i` `J i` ` 0 "`3 so " " ‘n·· · site N

if I I ifil I “ so in it cenn A r rrr P