Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:03-cv-00988-RNC

Document 35

Filed 07/12/2004

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

EILEEN STOEHR, ET AL., plaintiff, VS. : Civil No.: 303CV00988 (RNC) JULY 12, 2004

UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION : Defendant.

FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Plaintiffs move for an extension of time to and including August 16, 2004 within which to file their papers in opposition to the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment dated June 17, 2004 and received by plaintiff's counsel on or about June 19. The reasons for this motion are that plaintiff's counsel has been continuously on trial since June 15 and requires additional time to prepare responsive papers. In addition the parties have had some settlement discussions, which are ongoing. This is the first request for an extension relating to this motion. Counsel has attempted to contact counsel for the defendant to determine whether the defendant consents to the granting of this motion but thus far has been unable to do so.

THE PLAINTIFFS

David N. Rosen 400 Orange Street New Haven, Connecticut 06511 (203) 787-3513 CT00196 E-mail: [email protected]

Case 3:03-cv-00988-RNC

Document 35

Filed 07/12/2004

Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed, first class, postage prepaid on July 12, 2004 to:

David A. Reif, Esquire Allison Wood, Esquire McCarter & English, LLP CityPlace I, 185 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103 Dudley W. Von Holt United Industries, Corporation One U.S. Bank Plaza St. Louis, MO 63104

David N. Rosen