E DEL
_g G»a»se‘3:O3—cv—OO99_O-AWT Document 20 Filed O2/24/2004 Page 1 oft l
r // l
is . . - . l
U ` ' "I‘\ *'·-"
cu — ‘
·—1
Q.
E i
-·—l - . I
D
Ol
QQ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i
Z DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT i
q-| ’-
E ALEXANDER GRAHAM and 1 CIVIL ACTION NO [
Ll JOSE CUEVAS ; J2 r _
Ei : 303CV990(AWT) .0 yr
g Plaintiffs : / L
ru VS. I i
\
Q :
Q, FIRELINE, INC. : I
an
FU I
; Defendant : FEBRUARY 4, 2004
>
2 DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO PRECLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY,
ru OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER
li
é
lg g Pursuant to Rule 37(c)( 1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule l6(b) of the
4—¤ rxr
E g Local Rules for the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, the defendant,
O ·-.
§ N Fireline, Inc. (“Defendant"), respectfully requests that this Court issue an order precluding the
4%) E plaintiffs, Alexander Graham and Jose Cuevas ("Plaintiffs") from utilizing any experts in this
0
§ 6 case on the ground that the time for the Plaintiffs to disclose their experts and produce expert
H M
E *3 reports has passed, and preclusion is warranted pursuant to Rule 37(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of
¤~ f' 1
E Civil Procedure. In the alternative, Defendant requests that the court extend all current discovery V
ru
E deadlines by at least three months and move the trial readiness date to sometime after January l,
0
E ztgs. q _
J; 6 ("~.l ..1 “_ l
iii; A Memorandum of Law in support of this Motion is attached hereto.
{U - ,
ti j e e
8 E" s"? · j
E ri a' i
rn GJ ·
FU 3 tg i
Q U
La M c:
M 0 -·—i
Z l>
hl O »—c
C1 U} nj I
·· ee-··e*e ·· so