Free Order on Motion to Strike - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

i - 3 —cv-OO990&WT Document18 Filed O2/24/2004 Page 1 oft i
i >· /4,/ `ee` A"
‘
l A l
=¤ l
.5, J
A §
ul UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5 DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
4.¤ i
. § ALEXANDER GRAHAM and : CIVIL ACTION NO.
Q 1% JOSE CUEVAS :
` pg : 303CV990(AWT) ./”"'
M Plaintiffs :
J § ¤ ‘
u-4 VS. I
. l
(I) .
YQ FIRELINE, INC. :
4J ·
T. Defendant : FEBRUARY 6, 2004 ,
Fl
ms
ui
E l
jj DEFENDANT FIRELINE INC.'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS' REPLY TO s
E, DEFENDANT'S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND OBJECTIONITO
E PLAINTIFF'S DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL -
za E gr Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. I2(t) and 38, respectively, the defendant, Fireline, Inc.
{E E EQ ("Defendant"), hereby moves to strike the Reply to Defendants Affirmative Defenses,.dated g
--, , ‘ ‘ ’
” O N . ...,. — =»· »"
E Z; January 29, 2004, tiled by plaintiffs Alexander Graham and Jose Cueyas ("P_laintiffs"), and
O ‘*‘l · ..;.>
5, ,*2, @ objects to the Plaintiffs' Demand for Jury Trial, dated January 29, 2004. In support of its
cu I
5 Hg Objection, Defendant offers the following:
gg ·-i H-1
E E I. BACKGROUND AND PERTINENT FEDERAL RULES
E Qi m A Th F deral Rules J
"' . C G

F “’ i
Q E2) Fed. R. Civ. P. 7, entitled "PLEADINGS ALLOWED; FORM OF PLEADINGS," states
(D <1> .
J3 “"* ‘
3 S 2 in pertinent part:
¤ 2 is
gg c5 it (a) Pleadings. There shall be a complaint and an answer; a reply to a
Ei 5 —P, "‘‘‘‘ T counterclaim denominated as such; an answer to a cross-claim, if the
ij LL' " A qanswer contains a cross—claim. . . N0 other pleading shall be allowed,
*¤ E g ’- - J except that the court may order 21 reply to im &mSW€1‘ or E1 third-party EIHSWGI'.
4; fn .c:"* L.? `
4-) iF‘= x _ ` l V ·
B r: dv . _
2 cu -.4 { _. ‘
§ "5 ff. M
LD D ¤Z -