Free Motion to Compel - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 56.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: September 21, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 518 Words, 2,861 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22939/57-1.pdf

Download Motion to Compel - District Court of Connecticut ( 56.3 kB)


Preview Motion to Compel - District Court of Connecticut
N N- NNNNN ...._-_..T.....—...;N....__..----—·——4-—---+»-~——.I.N
N N l ase 3:03-cv-01009-SRU Document 57 Filed O9/20/2004 Page 1 of 2 .|
N N
N NN “‘i?3 N"?
_ N; l. N N — N N
Hill EEZ? EO lj l‘ U2
N . .
UNITED STATES DISTRICT'C()[l]§ljlliNl' ii`? `· ` N. N N
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT- N N “ “ N
JOSEPH ATTIAS & I-LAIM ATTIAS N CIVIL NO. 3:03 Cv 01009 (SRU) N
Plaintiffs : N N
. N N N
. N . _e PATRONS MUTUAL INSURANCE N N
" COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT N N
Defendant : SEPTEMBER 17, 2004
N I
MOTION T0 COMPEL DISCLOSURE, N
Q N
Pursuant to Rule 37 (a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Plaintiff hereby N ·
moves the Court for an order compelling the Defendant to fully and properly comply with the N
Plaintit`fs’ discovery requests dated September 3, 2004, by answering interrogatory number 1, 2
and 4, and producing the documents requested in production request numbers 1 and 2. The N
defendant has objected to these requests states tat "further disclosure of such information is
complied in anticipation of litigation and forms the basis for impeachment of witnesses? This N N
objection is completely without merit and the discovery requests go directly to the defendant’s N
special defenses and counterclaim in this case. Please see attached compliance in dispute.
The plaintiffs request the Court to order the defendant to comply with the discovery N N N
request.
The Plaintiffs further seek an order of the Court requiring the defendant to pay for the
costs, including attorney fee incurred in the filing and prosecution of this motion. N
In support of this motion the Plaintiff relies on the attached memorandum in support. N
N
N N N
N
N N
··.NN,··_NN,-- NN N- NN N- NN N- NN N- NN NN NN NN NN N. NN .. NN .. I __ I
,··_ 3;- NN N- NN -- NN N- NN N- NN NN NN NN NN N. NN .. NN .. I __ I _
.NN. · ·_NN,·· NN -- NN N- NN N- NN N- NN NN NN NN NN NN NN N. NN .. NN .. I __
_''_ f`_f_f` H " T ·· NN -- NN N- NN -- NN N. NN .. .N .. H __ ,_ __ ,_

l , Case 3:03-cv-01009-SRU Document 57 Filed O9/20/2004 Page 2 of 2 q T
. ¤
l .
\ I
THE PLAINTIFF, l
q I
.~ 1 i
BY 4K -... I
C W y! """" ‘l .
Farver& ef ern n l I
2842 O d Dixweli Avenue i
Hamden, Connecticut 06518 `I
Telephone: 203·288-8266 .' J
Facsimile: 203-288-4702 y *
Fed Bar N0.:CT 06473 Q
CERTIFICATION l ` l
l ¤ l
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent by first class mail, postage prepaid . l
this 17TH day of September 2004, to: q i
Heather Adams-Beman, Esq. q N
Joel Rottner, Esq. q
Skelley Rotmer P.C. q
PO Box 340890 i E
Hartford, CT 06134-0890 _ /__.
Ch . Heffernan 2
l
i l
i A
l

2 i
l i
i
_ _ _ .. . i