Free Motion to Compel - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

J .I-.I.Ir..-._.......,e,,....r.€....i...................... »..`
· . l
Case 3:03-cv-01009-SRU Document 48 Filed 06/29/2004 Page 1 of 2 j I
rr l ll
j i `

`l
l
l
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
JOSEPH ATTIAS & HAIM ATTIAS : CIVIL NO. 3:03 CV 01009 (SRU)
Plaintiffs :
PATRONS MUTUAL INSURANCE :
l
COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT : l
Defendant : JUNE 21, 2004 P-..»
:i:.f V7 J2`- E
fi g fe; I I
[WE" 6 .:7... $21% `
MOT lONJ`Q_ COMPEL DISCLOSURE; no S"t‘“”
·· ···* rr W j
co ce ;l> W
E I.'` YF? ·--- r
Pursuant to Rule 37 (a) ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Plaintiff heiiiby i
~= w .. j
moves the Court for an order compelling the Defendant to fully and properly comply with the l
l
Plaintiffs’ discovery requests dated February 23, 2004, by answering interrogatory number 3 and l
producing the documents requested in production request number]. The defendant initially
objected in a response dated April 13, 2004 on the claimed grounds that the requests are “[of|verly (
broad, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence." Said objection i (
was filed well past the thirty day period set by the rules and the subject discovery request itself for
compliance. The defendant has now tiled an additional objection under the title of "Seeond
Supplemental Responses to Plaintift`s‘ Interrogatories Directed to the Defendant, Patrons Mutual
Insurance Company of Connecticut? By way of that pleading the defendant objects on the original (
rl
grounds with elaboration and further objects on the grounds of privacy of their policy holders.
l
The plaintiffs request the Court to order the defendant to comply with the discovery rj
l
request. ii
l
ajajg g. .. . .. 4. ... .;._ _ _ j I in `·`‘ clee
" ’ ·· V ""i`:ZT "'T'*jf‘·"’j·j’_- ·-·r Z- .7 _ _ W H I W - H I W - H I W - n I W - H I W - H I W - H I W - n in I--- I---

_ i . ..2,w22u.w..........M........................................ I
—i I ` I Case 3:03-cv-O1009q§RU Document 48 Filed 06/29/2304 Page 2 of 2 I I I
I . I
l I I
I
I I I
I I I
The Plaintiffs further seek an order of the Court requiring the defendant to pay for the . .
costs, including attorney fee incurred in the filing and prosecution of this motion. I I I
In support of this motion the Plaintiff relies on the attached memorandum in support. I
THE PLAINTIFF, I
. fi Iit. . Ji·~ Nj? I
. - ,:¢?’“f “`’' ,/I I
13}%/ i--i ~ ~`·· _/“ .%,.....7.. .~-i» ··4t pé I .
Cheryl __·. Iwfe fernan . `
Farve1;@c"I—Ieffernan I
2842 Old Dixwell Avenue I
Hamden, Connecticut 06518 I I
Telephone: 203—288-8266 I I ;
Facsimile; 202.-zss-4702 I I
Fed Bar No.:CT 06473 I I I
CERTIFICATION I I
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent by first class mail, postage prepaid I
this 2 lS° day of June 2004, to: I

Heather Adams-Beman, Esq. I
Joel Rotmer, Esq. I
Skelley Rottner P.C. I
PO Box 340890
Hartford, CT 06134-0890 I I
. I I
" I _._ I_'....i-—*"”`”lP·`.`l'Np r_»'/ii / I
{Cheryl E. " · man ..., .
I I
2 I