Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

l Case 3;03—cv—O1 O1 T Document 34 Filed 02/ ii ) 04 Paééjfldldu [ zi I l
` § V ..
U " ` "°” F *2
l gl n lim l glam - l
p U UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO M t
°’ DISTRICT ONN ECTICUT
y §· . OF C mu JAN gl,
"l D ,3: 5 O
NICHOLAS CAGGIANIELLO, NEIL CIVIL ACTION NO.
HOWARD and THOMAS FALCO, on behalf` 'MR TFQRD C UR
of themselves and all other similarly situated ' r YZ
ir; employees of FSG PrivatAir, Inc. l
- #3
§ Piaintirrs, l
E January 23, 2004 ,
,*3 vs.
3 l
GJ
5 .
ii F SG PRIVATAIR, l and in their I
Q individual and official capacities DAVID C.
g HURLEY, HUGH F. REGAN, THOMAS H. I
E MILLER and THOMAS L. CONNELLY T
U V
Q I!. O Defendants. p
P ii i l MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME l
A g The Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby move this
E!
U .
Q honorable Court for an order confirming the time the parties have within which to tile n
2 . 3
. answers to the first phase of discove propagated pursuant to Rules 33 and 34 b
W _ YY Y
gf g allowing each party the full 30 days time with which to respond pursuant to said rules; or, i
'¤‘ U .
li R in the alternative, an order granting an extension of time within which to respond to
Q 0
O
51 2 interrogatories and requests for production that is consistent with Rules 33 and 34 of
3 JJ
H Federal Civil Procedure by allowing 30 days. In support of said request/motion, the
' ·¤ ni ..
.’ § Plaintiffs state ag follows:
*" G3 ` —-- ar-;
A F ·..= . That OI1g l‘)€I` 24, 2003 this honorable Court approved the competing Case l
JJ ·r·1 -1 :·· »~·. ··‘ __ t
gig _i Plan submitted by the Defendants and ordered the first phase of
E Q ' . rr §J°’;.f I
§ " disiboverydaddressing the jurisdictional issue alone, be completed by January 23, ·
5 § 5 =’- ` --¥·¥i {Ti?
ui §."' 2004. _ r
5 gl g .
QI H . .
5 5 H st -
H - - V 7